preview

Gerald A. Sandusky Case Summary

Decent Essays

When a case comes to the court that involves children or cases of child abuse, especially sexual abuse. It becomes a tug of war debate between those that support harsher punishments to deter such a horrendous crime as sexually abusing children, and those that support the idea that it is a illness that requires medical treatment on the biological or psychological level. Then there is also the call for how ethical it is to punish rather than treat such criminals.
In regards to the Gerald A. Sandusky case, which began in June 11th 2012 and ended on October 9th 2012. We are presented with a case where an individual was given unlimited access to young boys of all ages, some from poor and underprivileged backgrounds. Of the 52 charges Mr. Sandusky received, 4 charges were initially dropped, leaving 48. On June 22, 2012, Sandusky was convicted of 45 counts of sexual abuse. Sandusky was sentenced on October 9, 2012, to a minimum of 30 years and a maximum of 60 years in prison (Klein, Tolson, …show more content…

Sandusky's case his actions of grooming, planning, using threats etc, show him to be a man who has understanding of his actions and crimes, where others who put less thought and are much more rash do not, tho neither criminal is absolved based on how well they hid their crimes. Sexual abuse of a child with any method is a horrendous crime.
Is it ethical then to punish people who commit sexual abuse against children? Or should our approach be treatment not punishment? This is an age old debate, while there have been attempts to treat the 'disease' of pedophilia, there are exceptions to this treatment whom despite it do reoffend. Counseling, monitoring, medicating, and even chemical castration are some ways our society has developed to "treat" the biological and psychological side of the argument

Get Access