preview

Ghazali Conditional Statement

Decent Essays

Al-Ghazali begins his discussion of theodicy with a conditional statement that will frame the rest of his one-hundred-line discussion contained in his Ihya text. This conditional statement has as its antecedent a series of eight hypotheticals which are aimed at creating a hypothetical multitude of immensely knowledgeable and wise creatures. The antecedent contains the following hypotheticals: all creatures being as intelligent and knowledgeable as the most intelligent and knowledgeable human, God giving each creature the maximum knowledge and wisdom that their souls can handle, God then giving each creature the combined knowledge of all creatures, God revealing to each creature the consequences of things, God teaching each creature the mysteries of the transcendent world, God teaching each creature about divine favor, God making each creature aware of final punishments, God making each creature aware of good and evil and of benefit and harm. All of these components of the antecedent serve to set up a scenario in which there exists a multitude of extremely wise and knowledgeable creatures. These components are presented in lines one through sixteen of the passage quoted by Ormsby on his pages 38-41 of Theodicy in Islamic Thought. If the conditions of the antecedent were met, says Al-Ghazali, then another conditional claim would be the case. This second conditional claim, which is the consequent of the first conditional claim and is contained in lines sixteen through nineteen, has as its antecedent God asking all of the now hyper-wise and hyper-knowledgeable creatures to work together in creating the best possible arrangement of this world and of the transcendent world. If God asked this of the creatures in the hypothetical, Al-Ghazali says in lines nineteen through twenty-four that the creatures would produce an arrangement that is exactly identical to the way in which God has arranged His creation as it truly is. Al-Ghazali, in lines twenty-four through twenty-seven goes so far as to say that the product would not have subtracted or added as little as a gnat’s wing and that it would not have altered the position of a single particle of dust. The product of the creatures’ labors also would not differ from

Get Access