Globalism Vs Globalization

Globalization has dependably rivaled other verifiable strengths, including patriotism. Accordingly, history has seen both periods in which the world has turned out to be more incorporated, and times in which the pattern has been switched. There was, for occurrence, a high level of worldwide financial association from the mid-nineteenth century until

Globalization is a concept that has become a common dinner table topic in today’s society; however, the meaning of globalization and its definition are often times confusing to someone who is unfamiliar with the topic. Therefore, to first understand globalization is to understand how it is defined; globalization is considered to be a process of interaction and integration between the people, the companies, and the government of different nations that is driven by international trade and investment, and also aided by information technology. Based on this definition, it is easy to see how globalization can have an effect on the environment, culture, political systems, economic development, prosperity, and on human physical well being in societies around the world. Therefore, because globalization can have such a profound effect on a society and the well being of its people, then the idea of globalization being considered a structural violence can also be hinted when looking at the bigger picture. Structural violence is a concept coined by sociologist Paul Farmer; according to Farmer, “structural violence is the natural expression of a political and economical order that seems old as slavery, it is a social web of exploitation in its many differing historical forms and has long been global” (Lechner & Boli, 2015, pg. 155). Therefore, Farmer explains that this form of violence is a vicious cycle that can occur in globalization because it is on such a large scale and various

Nationalism drove change in the world after World War II by resisting foreign interferences which is evident in events such as the End of Mandates and the Soviet Sino-Split as well as Pan-Arabism.

Globalization is the intensification of networks of interdependence at multi-continental distances. It is the idea that actions in one area of the world affect different areas in the world. The argument, though, is whether or not globalization is occurring, if countries are dependent or interdependent. When turning on the news today, one might see more on whats going on in Russia or North Korea than in their own backyard. This is an example of Globalization. By examining it through Neorealism, one can better understand its prevalence. Neorealism primarily centers on the importance of the structure of the international system when explaining the events in international politics. It states that a state’s position in the international system determines its actions and behavior. The father of Neorealism, Waltz, stated in the Journal of Politics and Society that, “different international relation structure permit and cause the units of a system to change their behavior and produce different outcomes”(Waltz p.4). If that be the case, then Globalization is at the center of politics. The theory of Neorealism itself defends the argument that Globalization is occurring; one state’s capabilities directly affects another’s actions.

Before the war, nationalism had swept through the world, most notably playing a role in other

Globalism has been steadily increasing throughout the world in recent decades, but with Trump’s presidential victory, a wave of nationalism is now sweeping across America in rebuke. Globalists push for a one world government under the guise of world peace and prosperity, and they do this by promoting open borders and interconnectedness through free trade deals. However, their policies can undermine the political power of nations. It is important for Americans to unite and adopt a nationalistic view because globalism proves detrimental to the safety and prosperity of the citizens of the US. The American government must put the interest of America first by controlling its borders, protecting the people’s financial security from foreign entities,

Globalization is taking place across the world where people can either become globalization or stay local in the state or country. People are very controversial about globalization helping local economies and local businesses. Some people believe globalization is helping local businesses into the markets and then there are some that believe that multinational corporations hurting the local small businesses. What is globalization? “the development of an increasingly integrated global economy marked especially by free trade, free flow of capital, and the tapping of cheaper foreign labor markets” (). Globalization has started long before we were born.

The concept of nationalism is in essence an odd organization that has had significant impacts in world history through shaping the political and social aspects of the society. As an important aspect in the development of the society, the concept of nationalism has basically been analyzed based on its impact on the emergence of nation-states across the globe. In most cases, these analyses have been conducted to determine the influence of nationalism on imperial breakdown i.e. the dissolution of empires. While the actual extent of the impact of nationalism on the imperial breakdown is uncertain, this concept has played a major role in the dissolution of empires. Generally, the transition to nationalism has contributed to significant effects in world history through shaping the political and social aspects of the society.

In these two article globalization and the increase of globalism is described in two very different ways. Waltz arguing from a realist’s perspective; that the politics of the state is ultimately affected within globalization. R.O.keohane and J.S.Nye Jr express a liberal opinion, arguing the many different factors that affect the increase in globalism.

Saskia Sassen argues that for one to understand the contemporary globalization, it is crucial for an individual to examine how the historical assemblages of authority, territory and right have been remade and reworked on. (Sassen, 2006) The ideas of Saskia Sassen, a leading globalization scholar, are helpful in the analysis of the debate about the movement of refugees in the wake of the Paris attacks. Saskia stipulates that something really big is happening behind globalization. (Sassen, 2006) She is interested at the point where globalization gets messy. Although globalization is good for the economy, there are "other things" that get associated with it eliciting a debate on the opening and closing borders for the refugees in the wake of Paris attack.

Twenty-first century is defined by globalization, something Thomas L. Friedman unquestionably agrees with in his book The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. Globalization can immediately be correlated with businesses, but such should not be the case in this circumstance. Globalization, as a matter of fact, also takes its effect on cultures worldwide. For example, thanks to globalization, western cultures are able to perceive the cultures of other countries around the world, some of which are found to be ‘exotic.’ However, when this occurs, there is a certain concern that must be brought up: the issue with looking at the world from a western lens.

In a recent speech in Washington, President Donald Trump stated, “We will no longer surrender this country or its people to the false song of globalism,”. Mr. Trump has sworn to put America first. What does this mean for the rest of the world? Is globalization a defective idea? While globalization does have some cons, there is no denying that it has had commendable effects in many present day nations and metropolitan areas. Although it would be rather predictable to say that globalization is advancing, the trend of economic globalization is likely to retreat in the future rather than advance due to the standing of current politics. Concurrently, especially in recent years, political leaders have emphasized populism and portrayed nationalism in a way that supports the idea of anti-globalization. Internationalism has consistently been a primarily metropolitan idea, while in contrast those in smaller rural communities do not always support globalization. Increasingly often, political leaders dig into this separation, in conjunction with the growing separation between rich and poor.

Globalization has created a world, where companies compete on a similar level for creating a brand image to manage and enhance export. Globalization is the principal and most favourite motto of brands and businesses around the world. This concept has turned into a key idea for business practice and has entered academic debates (Giddens, 1990). Businesses are not limited to national boundaries, but has spread over the world and connected with each other in relation to the global business. Since 1995, the market for luxury brands has rebounded dramatically with the world-wide annual sales growth of 10 percent per year and high growth rates approaching 30 percent in certain Asian markets (Nueno, J., Quelch, J., 1998). Renewed consumer

According to Rourke (2008) the most important way people have identified themselves politically for five centuries is through nationalism (p. 102). Nations are formed when people who “share demographic and cultural similarities [who identify themselves] as a group distinct from other groups and want to control themselves politically” (p. 103) band together in a national political identity which has “a soul, a spiritual quality” (Rourke, 2008, p. 103). Feelings of nationalism can be very intense and difficult to put aside because of this. For the concept of globalization to continue to spread and grow nationalistic feelings must be tempered with cosmopolitan ideals.

“We live in a world that is simultaneously shrinking and expanding, growing closer and farther apart…. National borders are increasingly irrelevant. And yet globalism is by no means triumphant. Tribalism of all kinds flourishes. Irredentism abounds”. (Lereche, p.117)