Painting analyzing
The painting that I chose is "Goethe in the Roman Countryside." By J.H.W. Tischbein, 1786. I think it captures the movement with the location that it is at and with the way the person is posing. The outfit he has on also indicates that he was from this particular era, including the big attention seeking black hat. If you study the background carefully it clearly represents the Romantic Period right down to the nail. The part that confuses me about this painting is that it is a male in it when a female would have portrayed this part a lot more conveniently and made it easier to understand. I just think that the fact that there is a man in this role makes the photo a lot harder to dictate the era and what is going on. With
I chose the picture of a woman wearing a yellow hat sitting on a ledge. The artists name is Norman W. Lewis. He gave the painting the title ‘The Yellow Hat’, do to the woman wearing a big yellow hat. The picture has much contrast to tell that there’s a corner behind the woman, and that she is sitting on a ledge, and how her face is covered by the brim of her large hat.
The art piece that I selected for my analysis is called The Triumph of Divine Love by Peter Paul Rubens. The artwork is an oil painting on canvas, circa 1625. This piece of art was commission by Isabella Clara Eugenia, Infanta of Spain and Portugal. The Triumph of Divine Love was one of eleven art pieces in a series portraying the Eucharist cycle, an important issue in the Catholic-Protestant strife. Its purpose was to aid in the Catholic Reformation and the artwork was to be displayed at the Convento de las Descalzas Reales in Madrid. (Ringling Museum n.d.)
I remember viewing Portrait of Dr. Heinrich Stadelmann by Otto Dix during an eleventh grade field trip to the Art Gallery of Ontario, and being completely entranced by the painting—unable to look away from it. At the time, I was not fully aware of the world of art and did not have the vocabulary and knowledge to articulate my interest in this particular painting. Now, after returning to the painting three years later, the experience is quite different. Being recently exposed to a fairly wide range of art last semester has allowed me to experience the painting under a more knowledgeable light. During this most recent viewing of the painting I paid more notice to the painter’s decisions regarding the paint application, the textures, the colouration, the lines, the composition, etc. The core of this different experience during this viewing is due to a newfound consciousness of artistic choice.
Imperial Rome, during the first century A.D. was expanding it's boundaries by adding new territories. They expanded into northern Europe and Britain and conquered or attempted to conquer various types of people. Based on my reading of Tacitus' The Agricola and The Germania, I have knowledge of the life and customs of the Britons, subject of the Agricola, and the Germans, subject of the Germania. This of course being the Romans, and more specifically Tacitus,' observation and view of these groups of people.
The legions, the auxiliaries, and the Praetorian Guard made up the army. The legions consisted of Roman citizens. They had doctors, surveyors, and engineers. Their main focus was the military, but they also built roads, aqueducts, walls, and tunnels. The auxiliaries consisted of noncitizens and fought along with the legions. The Praetorian Guard were the emperor’s personal bodyguard. They were an elite group of soldiers.
The piece I chose is Pablo Picasso’s “Nude combing her hair”. I first saw it at the Kimbell Art Museum and remember admiring it. It was finished in 1906 and is oil paint on canvas. The main (only) figure in this painting is a nude woman, standing, who appears to be combing through her hair with her fingers after bathing. Although abstract, Picasso creates a very elegant, raw, and naturalistic form using color, space, and his depiction of figure.
Brown, Peter. The World of Late Antiquity. London: Thames & Hudson, 1971 (rpt. New York: Norton, 1989).
Roman triumphs explain many things about the Ancient Romans like who they were as a people, what they valued, and what they deemed worthy of celebrating. Mary Beards book, The Roman Triumph, delves right into the midst of the triumphal celebrations of the Romans and what evidence historians have been able to use to change their idea about Ancient Roman culture. Triumphs were an important part of Roman culture; they demonstrated what this warrior state viewed as
The later Roman Republic and early Roman Empire controlled most of modern day Europe through Northern Africa to Asia Minor. This time of complete dominance over much of the known world propelled Rome into a new era of wealth and prosperity that allowed Romans to look past military expansion. The Roman state now turned towards betterment of society and the “craving for a good education.” Education was seen not only as a tool for the furthering of personal careers, but as a way to improve Rome. Education passed along virtue and the skills necessary to run the Republic and early Empire. This knowledge began in the home, transferring from father to son through the role of fathers as paterfamilias or head of household. Fathers were in charge of ensuring the best possible education for their sons in hope that they would further the ideals and goals of a glorious Rome. Education, through the different steps of the informal Roman education structure and through the influence of the father, furthered the ideal of Roman virtue and ensured generations of virtuous leaders.
The painting depicts real people doing everyday things, like studying. Classical Antiquity was greatly displayed through another painting it depicts a normal person holding a balance. In the Middle Ages this would have been frowned upon because they discouraged the making of realistic paintings (Follett software). Realistic paintings would not have been introduced to the Renaissance without the humanists studying classical antiquity.
position. He is prepared to go so far as to sign a compact with the
When you’re reading literature it can be somewhat easy to spot the time period, beliefs, and politics. Those are just some factors that can be portrayed in a society. When most authors write they portray their past experiences into their work to create a better connection to what they’re writing about. Then the reader can relate their own personal experiences when reading the works to also get a better connection. Some of the works that will be discussed are written by authors who have portrayed their own experiences and they are “Tartuffe” by Moliere and “Faust” by Goethe. In these works of literature they show the different societies that are portrayed and the types of literary devices used by the author to give their point of view. Also, how each time period has changed throughout history and how it affects human lives. The literature around today would show a different reflection of society then the ones we’ve read over the course. People evolve and adapt to the changes around them, so in literature the authors Moliere who wrote “Tartuffe” and Goethe who wrote “Faust” allowed their works to reflect their society in which they lived.
the inventor of the bridle, the trumpet, the flute, the pot, the rake, the plow,
Often thought of as the epitome of Romanticism, Goethe’s Faust details the adventures of It’s hero that can be thought of to represent the turmoil that was grasping European society in the years of late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Faust can be viewed as a romantic hero because of his attitude and the progression of his character throughout the story and runs nearly parallel with what was happening around Europe at the time Goethe transpired this play. Faust offers a transition from the cold realization of the Enlightenment to a warm comfort that came to be described as Romanticism. Faust shows a way to express how he deals with morals and all the learning along the way in order to feel fulfillment or belonging, while also shadowing a mindset that European society was struggling to deal with after their world found reason to no longer be a spark for their overall culture of life.
The last canvas I found is the opposite in a way of the two I talked about. The Consummation of the Empire, I found this picture strange at first, that is why I chose it. Consummation meaning the completion of something, it is representing the finishing of Civilization. The point is nature has been taken over, nature is not the main focus anymore, the big white buildings seem to take over most of the land with lots of people as well. So how does this painting play a role in Romantic times ? Instead of taking what is beautiful out of something bad it does the opposite. This painting takes something that is beautiful, meaning the big white buildings, the clear blue sky and what seems to be a lot of people and makes you realize that nature is more important. In all three of these canvases, it seems that the color and texture play a role in how the artist is trying to explain emotions and how what they have gone through or what they may want to go through can affect their