Gordon Allport (1897-1967) was one of the very first American psychologists who studied personality traits through a humanistic approach. He focused on the conscious instead of the unconscious, and that personality is guided more so by the present and future rather than the past. Allport defined personality as "the dynamic organization within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine characteristics behavior and thought" (Allport, 1937). This paper will go into further detail of Allport's concepts and theories. Articles including some of Allport's own case studies and writings were used for this paper. There is also information retrieved through articles of study on Gordon Allport's life and his work. Some questioned …show more content…
"It gave me a feeling of competence, to offset a generalized inferiority feeling."(Allport, 1967, pp.5-7). Allport was also strongly influenced by his religious family background and often had an eager sense of philosophical questing and religious answers. He grew up in a household of three older brothers. His mother was a teacher and his father was a salesman who wanted to be a doctor. Allport's mother had devout religious beliefs and practices that dominated the house. There was no smoking, drinking, dancing, or even card playing allowed in his own home. Also no family member was allowed to wear bright colored or distinctive clothing and jewelry of any kind. Allport wrote that his mother was "on the serve side with a strong sense of right and wrong and quite strict in her moral ideals"(Quoted in Nicholson, 2003, p.17). Allport believed that personality was an evolving structure within an individual psychophysical system that determined characteristic behavior and thought. He defined traits as structures within a person that influence behavior and he distinguished between common traits and personal traits, which he later called personal dispositions to clarify uniqueness among each individual. Cardinal traits are powerful and pervasive, whereas central traits central traits are less persuasive. Also secondary traits are less conspicuously and less consistently than other types of traits. Allport's idea of the proprium, which was termed
The current paper will explore the history and future of personality in social psychology, and how the integration of these fields show more similarities than differences.
Burger (2008), says that there are many theories of personality and psychologists try to explain it with their own approaches. Discussed here will be the psychoanalytic approach, the trait approach, the biological approach the humanistic approach, the behavioural/social learning approach and the cognitive approach. They were devised to search for specific patterns in behaviour and ways of thinking about these
Trait theories assume people have many traits that are continuing qualities that individuals have in different amounts. Allport’s theory suggests that there are 3 main traits: central, secondary, and cardinal. A central trait is a characteristic that controls and organizes behavior in various situations. A secondary trait can be described as a preference and is specific to certain situations. A cardinal trait is very general and pervasive. It is so pervasive that an individual is governed by it and it dictates everything a person does.
Personality and how we behave have been of much interest to psychologists for a long time now and because of this there have been many theories and theorists that have been developed. Personality is defined as consistent behavior patterns and intrapersonal processes originating within and individual (Fritzley, 2012, p. 10). There are six main approaches to personality psychology they include: biological approach, humanistic approach, behaviorist approach, trait approach, psychoanalytic approach and cognitive approach. Each approach shines a little light onto why we behave the way we do and how our personalities are formed, the approaches contain many different theories from
Everybody has his or her own type of personality. We all act in a certain way that makes us who we are. It is believed that our parents, peers and, the environment we grow up in, shape us. Personality is describes as a combination of emotions, attitude, and behavioral patterns of an individual. There is a reason that we are the way we are and there are many theories that go along with that. Different theorist present their own definitions of the word personality based on their own theoretical positions. Which brings us to discussing Carl Jung’s theory of analytical psychology and Harry
Personality is defined as an individual’s unique and relatively consistent patterns of thinking1. In psychology, personality is utilized to sum up all the ways of an individual’s thinking, feeling and acting that based on the environment and experience. Various personality theories exist and are categorized into four major perspectives—Psychoanalytic, Humanistic, Social Cognitive and trait perspective. These four major perspectives on personality help to describe the numerous patterns in each individual’s personality.
There are very distinct differences between Psychodynamic and Humanistic Counselling but both ultimately offer the help and guidance to discover why we act the way we do and why we make certain choices in our lives.
Personality Theories Paper Anthony J. Hebdo Ohio Christian University May 30, 2018 Personality Theories Paper Psychodynamic theory is the view of personality with the focus on the unconscious and the importance of childhood experiences (Myers & DeWall, 2014). These theories view human behavior as an interaction between the conscious and unconscious mind. Psychodynamic theory focuses on trying to get inside the head of individuals to make sense of their relationships, experiences and how they see the world. Sigmund Freud was the leading psychologist of his time, and is best known for developing the theories and techniques of psychoanalysis.
The modern world of psychology is multi-faceted. Psychology is not just one discipline, but rather an assortment of many sub-disciplines. Some disciplines of psychology include behavioral psychology, humanistic psychology, and cognitive psychology. Psychologists practicing these different disciplines approach pyschological disorders differently. In this essay, I analyze how different pyschological approaches would view and treat Jake's anxiety disorder.
Humanistic Psychology can support various individuals regardless of their circumstances. The meaning of life can be different for many however; when we grow as individuals, we have no reason for living unless we create an importance through our passions, goals, and success’s. As an individual, I have an endless desire to help others find happiness, passion, and success; therefore, I believe that the humanistic approach in psychology would have a profound effect on people who are searching for a purpose in life.
This paper is a comparison of three different viewpoints on the subject of personality. Carl Jung, B.F. Skinner, and Carl Rogers all had very different outlooks on what defined someone’s personality. As an added feature I have included myself as a theorist because my views are also different from the previous mentioned theorists. This paper will also look briefly into the background of each theorist because their views on life began in their childhood. Amazingly you will notice the all had similar backgrounds, but came up with completely different ways of looking at life.
For centuries, philosophers, personality theorists and other thinkers have been trying to answer: what personalities are like, how personalities are developed, why different personalities are developed and how personalities can be changed (Pervin & Cervone, 2013). George A. Kelly, an American psychologist born in 1905 in Kansa, is one of those major contributors in the field of personality psychology (Warren, 1998). In this paper, I am writing to critically review George A. Kelly's perspective on personality. I will first review Kelly's philosophy of
The American psychologist, Gordon Allport (1937) looked at these two major ways to study personality, the nomothetic and the idiographic. Nomothetic psychology looks for general laws that can be applied to many different people, such as the factor
Historically, humanism finds its roots in the mid-20th century. Abraham Maslow developed his hierarchical theory of motivation in 1943. Carl Rogers published person centered therapy in 1946. In the 1950’s, Maslow and Clark Moustakas invited others to meetings among other psychologists interested in forming an association dedicated to a more humanistic perspective.
“We are influenced by our own internal forces, forces of which we are unaware, have feelings towards, or urges we do not quite understand “(Freidman, 2012, p. 17). This is the struggle that personality psychology tries to understand, how and to what extent the unconscious forces plays a role in human behavior. It is believed that people are responsible for their own actions. There is a continuous struggle with personality psychology and the comprehension of and to what extent unconscious forces play in human behavior. “Meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances; if there is any reaction both are transformed” (Carl Jung 1993, p.57). There are various questions that are asked about the issues in personality psychology such as, “How important are social influences on the self, such as parental deprivation or excessive praise? Is the sense of self merely an inconsequential epiphenomenon or secondary perception arising from other forces that really matter? What is the core of who we are? A second core issue with the studies of personality studies is does each person require a unique approach? “Gordon Allport argued that a key aspect of the study of personality must focus on the individual and thus be idiographic” (p.18). To generalize an individual is a complication in itself because the personality of each person is complex in its own way so how can we generalize? Obtaining an answer to that question is still a dilemma. Allport complained