Government Funding Of The Arts

The NEA helps art programs increase with money donations. The source to back this up is source F “Fiscal Year 2004 funding.” This great example shows you the facts sheet of how much the NEA program helps donate to the art culture spending over $100,000 dollars. To prove this point from the fact

The National Endowment for the Arts is an agency of the United States government that supports and funds artistic endeavors. According to the NEA website, the organization “funds, promotes, and strengthens the creative capacity of our communities by providing all Americans with diverse opportunities for arts participation.” (arts.gov). The agency’s programs consist of various educational organizations, outreach programs, and federal grants. The NEA is a federal arts program that was created during Lyndon B. Johnson’s administration in the hopes of encouraging American creativity and preserving the nations artistic traditions, especially the wide variety of musical traditions. By the mid-twentieth century the robust presence of music and opera

Griffith is a prime example of how the same piece of art has a different meaning to everyone who views

Throughout history there have been many public funding’s that contributed to the world of art. Whether anyone realizes it or not, artists have a lot of responsibilities to try and please the public when they are working for the public. Also, there are numerous regional issues that greatly influence decisions about publicly funded art. Art is very important when forming a sense of nation character, therefore, we should support the public funding of art in America. Art is an important part of society and it can also be a very valuable part of our everyday lives. However, there are many positive and negative effects when it comes to the public funding of art in America. Supporters claim that subsidizing the arts pays for itself. These supporters suggest that the arts are what drive the economy of businesses within a community.

Having posted this on World-Post, which is a news and blog website created through a partnership between Liberal news aggregator Huffington Post and a nonpartisan powerhouse, the Berggruen Institute on Governance, allows for this essay to not get exposed to the pro STEM or anti-arts parties. Sparking up the discussion of reintroducing the arts back into everyday society’s curriculum, you need to direct this essay towards both the audience, and the individuals who have the power to make this change. If Ma bring up a primarily pro-art focused paper, and only shares this piece of writing with mostly fellow supports of the arts, Ma misses the “equilibrium” that he spoke so highly about. If we can’t have both sides of the spectrum be able to analyze and discuss the ideas presented in this paper, then it’s going to be close to impossible to enact any change within society to reintroduce more of the arts back into

The NEA is a federal government agency with the initial goal help people learn to appreciate and give their attention to art by putting it somewhere they could not ignore it, in the public. The NEA still serves as an organization today, although it has focused itself to giving Americans the opportunity to participate in the arts and exercise their

Congress created The National Endowment for the Arts in response to the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act

The National Endowment for the Arts was created by an act of the U.S Congress in 1965 as an independent agency of the federal government of the U.S. Congress created the National Endowment of the Arts (NEA) to support and fund projects displaying artistic excellence. The grant money that the NEA receives comes from American taxpayers, furthermore that money has been used to fund art and more that are labeled “controversial”. In March of 2017, the Trump administration made a proposal to eliminate federal funding for the program. The NEA is a wonderful program that helps bring light to controversial subjects, creates regulations, and free speech.

     Public art conquers so much more than the simple task of making the street a little easier to look at. It involves those who created it, those who supplied the means to create it, and those whose lives it continues to impact. Wall paintings in particular take an important role in working for a greater good. Judith F. Baca, a Hispanic-American woman and artist- activist has contributed an unaccountable amount to the mural movement in Los Angeles. She has accomplished this by giving individuals the chance to create art and develop a sense of pride, she has taught younger generations a respect for their ethnic identity, and from the many walks of life that continue to view her

This article was written by the government so I know it is very reliable and trustworthy. Since I could not find any reliable sources that disagree with my topic I chose to use this source that explains why there were budget cuts against the arts, and the arguments for and against it. This article also gives statistics from over the years on how much the government spent on performing arts programs, and how their budget went down slowly over time. Additionally, this article discusses why performing

The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), which supports and helps fund artist and art programs has constantly been criticized since it was formed in 1965 by congress under Lyndon B. Johnson's presidency. This isn't the first time that the NEA has faced budget cuts and possible elimination. Thu-Huong Ha writes in her article, “People have been trying to get rid of the National Endowment for the Arts for 36 years.” The NEA's value has often been questioned by the federal government calling it a “bloated waste of public money and criticizing it as a funder of obscenities” (Ha). The budget cuts began after Ronald Regan's initial proposal to eliminate the NEA in 1989 which led instead to the budget being reduced by 10%. Next in 1989 and 1990 the

“Whatever these paintings may have been to men who looked at them a generation back- today they are not only works of art. Today they are the symbols of the human spirit made.... To accept this work today is to assert the purpose of the people of America that the freedom of the human spirit and human mind which has produced the world’s great art and all its science- shall not be utterly destroyed” -President Franklin D. Roosevelt, dedication ceremony of the National Gallery of Art, March 17, 1941.

Art most definitely should question the status quo. Art is a form of someone's expression on a particular issue, and our expression and beliefs on a issue is what makes us all individuals. We are all not the same so art shouldn't be either.

The writer for The Atlantic Monthly says, “It is universally admitted that public libraries must reserve certain books from general circulation” (Lines 16-18). The general public often has such a negative view on some books that these books are only available upon request. According to the writer of the article, the same thing should be done to the nude statues in museums. The writer states, “In the same way, it is reasonable to affirm that a public museum of art may be justified in excluding certain statues” (Lines 18-20). Like the exclusion of morally unacceptable books, statues that display nudity should not be able to be viewed by the general public. This argument is still valid today because many parents do not want their children to see nudity at a young age, so it is morally unacceptable to have nude statues in

Public art catches an abundance of attention and the artist receives so much recognition, there’s no need for the government to show it off even more. Instead of the government using their money for art, they can use it on more important things, such as employment and education for people who have no money to do so. With the government investing in art, they will not benefit from it a whole lot. They will be able to show it off to the public but will receive nothing from this.