Leadership Transformational leadership has always been my favorite. Perhaps because it was one of the very few styles I learned about as a young NCO, a young leader, and I felt that I can associate with it the most. However, as I exposed myself to additional education – whether military reading or self-development, I learned that leadership can be much more diverse than that, based on so many different assumptions and theories. I learned that leadership is also dependent on each individual, his values and beliefs, and most importantly, on the organizational culture permeating through the actions of both leaders and soldiers alike. Considering the amount of reading assigned to this course, it felt refreshing having the option to consider …show more content…
His determination, from start to finish, is inspiring when faced with such adversity. Kawasaki, a well-known keynote speaker and entrepreneurship and marketing expert, points out important lessons about resilience and overcoming adversity that can be drawn from this movie. He says "No matter what people tell you—or your inner voice tells you—you can beat the 800-pound gorilla. Or, in this case, grizzly bear," The movie does not focus on highlighting Glass’ typical leadership characteristics we are used to. Clearly, he is capable of providing purpose and motivation, shows professional competence, and can shape decisions that were for the good of the group. Instead, I think we can see other traits that are hidden and not as distinct. Many of the traits and skills identified by Stogdill and other trait theorists – adaptable, decisive, knowledgeable about group task, courage and resolution, to name just a few, are strongly present within his actions and lead him through to the …show more content…
However, these words were spoken for first time during the initial moments when trouble
The film Grizzly Man aims to demonstrate the common cliche, “not everything is how it seems.” It follows a man of the name Timothy Treadwell: his life before his death, his actual death, and the impact of his death. He spent 13 summers of his life within close proximity of grizzly bears until one takes his life. Before this event, the public only knew him as a passionate nature enthusiast, with his focus mainly on bears. They found entertainment in watching a cheerful idiot embracing these animals as friends.
Those that follow a transformational leadership framework believe that leaders possess many of the aforementioned qualities, but the focus is on one’s ability to inspire and empower others (Ross, Fitzpatrick, Click, Krouse, & Clavelle, 2014). These leaders literally ‘transform’ their followers by inspiring enthusiasm and performance towards a
Leadership development in the military is critical to its mission and objectives. Understanding and embracing leadership will foster an agile culture and facilitate attainment of strategic goals. People desire quality leadership to assist with achieving their goals, albeit personal or professional development. Having a clear vision and the motivation to perform at high-levels influences others to work synergistically together to achieve organizational goals. Insomuch, employees value being treated respectfully, fairly, and ethically. Leaders serve people best when they help them develop their own initiative and good judgment, enable them to grow, and help them become better contributors.
This paper on Leadership will compare the primary differences and characteristics between the tactical leader and the organizational leader. I will provide you with the basics for development, characteristics, and the fundamentals that help guide and influence each leader’s style and how they influence Soldiers to follow them. Leaders at all levels demonstrate their values, knowledge, skills, and abilities in many different means and methods in
My leadership philosophy revolves entirely around the Army Values. In every action I take as a leader, I assess whether or not it lines up with the Army Values and the potential impacts. I have had a variety of leadership assignments during my career, all requiring a different leadership approach, spanning from team leader through platoon sergeant. My conflict resolution skills have greatly evolved through my twelve years in the Army, from rudimentary conversations to in depth problem solving. My professional development has had a profound effect on my leadership abilities, from NCOPD’s to mentorship from senior non-commissioned officers (NCO’s).
Leaders are look upon as role models as they guide us with their motivating, influence to accomplish tasks. There are a lot of leadership styles; when leading, it is based on the situation. When I was in the military, I encountered with many different styles of leadership. A leadership that I considered meaningful is a Transformational Leader. The transformational Leader in the military with their inspiring charisma of motivating, influence creates a visualized path that produces energetic characteristics that inhere to new changes, developments, and possibilities.; by demonstrating authority, the Transformational Leader in the military utilizes their power to inspire and motivate people into trusting and following their example; this as
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several
Transformational Leadership: Something Old, Something New, as presented in the CMJ by Lieutenant-Colonel (LCol) Peter Bradley and Dr. Danielle Charbonneau, contains views on how
APD 6-22 defines a leader as anyone who by virtue of assumed role or assigned responsibility inspires and influences people to accomplish organizational goals. As a “street to seat” guy I do not have prior leadership experience as an NCO, but as I have progressed as a Warrant Officer I have learned a great deal about leadership. For this discussion post I will discuss two topics: what I’ve learned about being a leader as a Warrant Officer, and how decentralized leadership is utilized in my unit.
Throughout my life and my military career I have experienced various leadership styles, from civilian employers to military Officers and Non-Commissioned officers alike. Each had their own approach to leadership, some I found to be effective and others I did not. I have attempted to create a leadership philosophy based on a fusion of the leaders I have encountered and my own personal experiences.
General Powell displays transformation leadership through individualized consideration. “IC involves dealing with others as individuals and considering their needs, abilities, and aspirations as you work together to further their development.” General Powell’s Army background influences the idea of taking raw iron and fashioning it into a sword; as noted in his quote “leaders are made, not born” implies leadership is a shaping process. Transformational leaders who display individual consideration tend to coach and mentor, excel in two-way communications, listens effectively, and personalize interactions with subordinates. Part of General Powell’s principle of empowerment is an investment in the leadership potential of team members. This investment is necessary in sustaining productive organizations.
Leadership, according to the Army doctrine, represents individuals’ ability to influence people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improving the organization (“Leadership” FM 6-22). However, the varying characteristics of individuals that the Army attracts may instill this doctrine in many different ways, leading to different representations of leadership. Some individuals choose to lead their subordinate in a stern matter, only displaying matured emotions and a “tough-loving” attitude to guide them in the right direction. Others
1. What types of teams did you see in the film? Provide an example for each. (2 Points) 1. Functional team- the President is the leader in the Cuban missile crisis and makes the final decisions 2.
He illustrates to be a great leader. He is an inspirational leader who uses transformational leadership concerned with emotions, values, ethics, and long-term goals. He shows the capability of a good leader, motivates and inspires his men to follow him into battle and fight the British with him. Braveheart displays transformational leadership through Wallace’s developing personal characteristics, the follower’s characteristics, and in which the movie took place. William Wallace’s personality are one of the main factors of his transformational leadership style.
Beginning in boot camp and continuing throughout my career, I’ve seen the Coast Guard promote the leadership model to be: “You” influencing “Others” to achieve a “Goal”. With all the different ways leadership can be defined, this simplistic model which has been permanently engrained in my thinking definition still rings true for me. As such, when defining my own personal definition of leadership, I align it to this same model. More specifically, while I support the fact that leadership involves influencing others to achieve a common end I propose that is not the whole story. Leaders must not be stagnant in their vision and must lend themselves to the possibility they may have to adjust their leadership styles depending on the goal. The best leaders are the ones that understand their own personality traits as well as those traits of the people they are trying to lead.