In comparison to Individual Testing, Group Intelligence and Scholastic Aptitude tests are used more frequently within school settings as administration requires little training on the examiners part since directions are outlined clearly in their respective manuals. Such tests are cost efficient, requires simpler materials, evaluate students’ performance and include; Cognitive Abilities test (CogAT), Kahlmann-Anderson Test, Test of Cognitive Skills (TCS/2) and The Otis-Lennon School Ability Test, 8th edition (OLSAT8). The CogAT has a multilevel edition applicable for use with grades 3 through 12 and is comprised of three batteries for evaluating children’s verbal, quantitative and nonverbal abilities. The nonverbal category calls for geometric figures from tasks requiring classification, analogies or figure synthesis (Hood & Johnson, 2006). The Kuhlmann-Anderson Test on the contrary is consisted of seven different levels for kindergarten through grade 12 each having eight tests. It is considered one of the most popular group intelligence test for usage in schools is less relied upon language and produces verbal, nonverbal and total scores. The scores are then presented as confidence intervals and cognitive skills quotient.
Similarly the Test of Cognitive Skills 2 is administered as the group test equivalent to the Stanford-Binet and assesses verbal, nonverbal and short-term memory of children. It has six levels and is used with children in grade levels 2 through 12. The
When one speaks of intelligence or how bright another person is, the often quoted figure is the IQ or intelligence quotient. It is the most often used standard of how smart a person is. This paper shall look at what intelligence tests measure, how the IQ tests measure intelligence and interrogate their history. It shall then apply the tests to school policy and hence evaluate their validity.
Most standardized test do not measure emotional or mechanical intelligence, actually a lot of educators argue that standardized test do not measure comprehension or actual intelligence but rather memorization. While others may believe that standardized testing just needs a few improvements, others believe that it is impossible to have a test that measures accurately the capability of a diverse student population. Today’s schooling depends heavily on the test scores from standardized test. Standardized testing should not have so much weight put on them because they have a negative impact on effective education, students’ self-concept, and learning styles.
A major strength of this assessment is that this assessment has a Nonverbal Index. This is beneficial for students who are not yet proficient in the English language or struggle with language. Administering the Nonverbal Index allows the administrator to gain a better understanding of the child’s abilities because their language issues are not working against them with this test. Also, this assessment has two theories of intelligence that can be tested: the Luria neurological processing theory and Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of intelligence. With the Luria Model, you will obtain the Mental Processing Index of Learning Ability, Sequential Processing, Simultaneous Processing, and Planning Ability. With the Cattell-Horn-Carroll model, you will obtain the Fluid-Crystallized Index with the areas of long-term storage and retrieval, short-term memory, visual processing, fluid reasoning, and crystallized ability. This assessment is also more child-friendly because of the visuals throughout the test. A weakness of this assessment is the administrator will not be able to obtain a score for auditory processing and processing speed with this assessment, requiring the administrator to utilize another intelligence assessment. This assessment has two intelligence theories options to choose from: the Luria
In this paper, I will present my findings about the two testing (Cognitive Ability Test
“No issue in the U.S. Education is more controversial than (standardized) testing. Some people view it as the linchpin of serious reform and improvement, others as a menace to quality teaching and learning” (Phelps). A tool that educators use to learn about students and their learning capabilities is the standardized test. Standardized tests are designed to give a common measure of a student’s performance. Popular tests include the SAT, IQ tests, Regents Exams, and the ACT. “Three kinds of standardized tests are used frequently in schools: achievement, diagnostic, and aptitude” (Woolfolk 550). Achievement tests can be used to help a teacher assess a student’s strengths and weaknesses in a
In the society of today, there are various educators who believe in assessment as proper method to measure the performance of a child in school as well as the overall achievement of a specific school system. The assessment may be presented in the form of verbal, written, or multiple choice, and it usually pertains to certain academic subjects in the school curriculum. Recently, many educators began to issue standardized tests to measure the intelligence of a common student body. (Rudner, 1989) These standardized tests were initially created to reveal the success in institutional school programs, and exhibit the abilities of students today. The standardized tests can reveal the strengths and weaknesses
The test review on the SAT is completed along with the design to measure cognitive abilities, achievement, and intelligence. The description of the test and the intention of the test is included in this written assignment. Furthermore, the psychometric properties of the SAT are discussed. This includes its relation to reliability and validity. The discussion of items that are from the test is explained and any issues or concerns of the test are introduced. Finally, the test’s strengths and weaknesses, including a test evaluation are outlined.
There are a variety of topics that are interesting in life. This interest may then become a point of inquisition, where an individual may formulate a relationship between two variables, which may or may not influence each other. Next, a hypothesis is formed and tested. In this same manner, a school educator was interested in determining the potential relationship between grade point average (GPA) and IQ scores among ninth graders. The educator random sampled 30 ninth graders, ages 14 years old and administered the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). This writer will be expanding further on this topic and will formulate the null and alternative hypothesis, describe the four scales of measurement, describe whether if there is a correlation significant (positive, negative, or no correlation) enough between both variables, describe the strength of the relationship, describe what the results reveals about the hypothesis, and what conclusions can be drawn from the results.
This novel written by Keith Sawyer held so much information on how to better group interactions- anyone can walk away from this book with broader outlook on creating a “Group Genius”. Sawyer has laid out all of these great concepts and ideas in front of readers. It was an amazing way to express the possibilities that both, groups and teams can achieve. Whether these be small or big business teams, one or a couple inventors beginning their story or a sports team- all of these groups can apply what Sawyer has written, into their work and group atmosphere. A group has the choice to take these skills and adapt them into their own experiences, it can all spark from just one person making a change. I learned a lot
The Otis-Lennon School Ability Test, Eighth Edition (OLSAT-8) is used on students K-12 and is a scholastic achievement test. It can be administered individually or as a group and measures cognitive skills, reasoning abilities, and assesses the student’s capacity to learn (Pearson, 2017). The OLSAT-8 focuses on a student’s ability to adhere to directions, recall words/numbers, definitions, the capacity to classify and establish a sequence (Pearson, 2017). Moreover, a student is testing on solving math problems, categorizing
I graduated my high school in February 2010, but I could not get the score from the college scholastic ability test as much as I wanted. So, I chose to challenge again to take higher grade. However, I couldn’t settle my mind into the test preparation. There are several reasons, first, my grandparents’ health was noticeably worsened. Although I knew that my grandmother had a chronic disease, I never expected and imagined that their rest had been closed. After soon, both were called to their rest. Second reason is a bit complex. I have one older brother, and he already got into the university successfully. Moreover, he entered one of the prestigious school in the South Korea. And because of it, I got a tremendous oppression from my father, and
Eells found that the mental ability of children is an extreme importance in studying the curriculum in the Alaskan school system. The school administrators are more concern that the students have the “ability to work under any given conditions” (). By understanding students who are able work on any given conditions it will allow researchers to conclude that there are some positivity in using psychological testing.
which is a standardized test to measure intelligence. All of the students were given the same test
Over time, the tests were standardized to correspond to a priori conceptions of intelligence by including items that correlated well with school performance. Test items that differentiated between gender
Individuals should have an easy time completing this assessment. The format should prevent any inaccuracy in responses. The questions are written at a sixth-grade level. This could cause a problem for some individuals who can’t