.1 Compressive Properties
Table 3 shows the summary of compressive properties of the neat epoxy grouts and graphene-based epoxy grout. From the table, Grout A exhibited the highest compressive strength of 78.62 MPa compare to Grout B and Grout C with 56.0 MPa and 53.04 MPa respectively. The lowest strength is found in Grout C. Although the strength of Grout A is higher, but the highest compressive modulus is obtained from Grout B and Grout C with a value of about 12.94 GPa and 13.08 GPa compared to Grout A with only 9.99 GPa.
Table 3 Summary of the compressive properties
Grout Compressive Strength (MPa) Modulus (GPa)
A 78.62 ± 21.25 9.99 ± 1.89
B 56.0 ± 11.29 12.94 ± 0.62
C 53.04 ± 13.57 13.08 ± 1.01
The compression stress-strain curves of epoxy
…show more content…
Initial cracks were observed at top and bottom part of the sample where the maximum stress occurred. Through observation, there is no significant lateral expansion on the grout samples. The noticeable deformation surface failure is obviously shown on tested grout. The sample displayed split inclined crack at the top of the sample. The neat epoxy grout also exhibits sudden rupture as compared to graphene-based epoxy grout.
Figure 6 Typical stress-strain curves for compressive stress
Figure 7 Failure patterns of grouts under compression (a) Grout A (b) Grout B and (c) GroutC
5.2 Tensile Properties
Table 4 provides a summary of the tensile properties. It can be seen from the table that the tensile strength of the investigated grouts are in the range between 11 and 19 MPa respectively and tensile modulus for tested grouts are approximately 17 GPa. From the test results, the highest tensile strength was obtained from grout A with 0% of graphene content with 19.11 MPa.
Table 4 Summary of the tensile properties
Grout Tensile Strength (MPa) Modulus (GPa)
A 19.11 ± 1.82 17.35 ± 4.19
B 12.54 ± 2.50 17.17 ±
In Figure 4, Young's modulus is plotted against yield strength. The diagonal line in the figure represents the material index M= σy/E. Materials below the diagonal line are the best candidate materials because they will remain elastic while providing the maximum conformability. All materials that cost more than $2.20 per pound and have a UV rating of "poor" were eliminated. Also, only materials that can be made through the polymer extrusion process were considered. The candidate materials are listed in Table 1 and ranked by the material index. The current material, TPV, is included in the table for
The purpose of this lab was to test four different polymer coupons under a tensile load and determine mechanical properties. This was done under normal circumstances along with the samples soaking in different temperature water baths before being tested. It was found that Nylon 6 was the most brittle sample and that High Impact Polystyrene was the most elastic. It was also found that there is a general trend of materials getting more brittle when colder and more elastic when warmer.
This report aims to analyse and discuss the results of carrying out tensile tests for two materials, in this case Mild Steel and Nylon. The purpose of this is to use the information generated to calculate Young’s Modulus, Yield Stress, Tensile Strength, and Percentage Elongation. These properties must be known before designing a product using the materials tested, because the anticipated behaviour of the material must be suitable for the design specification, with a margin left for safety.
This describes graphite, but doesn’t speak of any quantities or statistics. To make this observation more quantitative, I could relate this information to the hardness scale. The hardness scale states that a fingernail has a hardness of 2.5. From this, I can conclude that graphite has a hardness less than 2.5 since harder objects scratch softer objects.
Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures. Korea Concrete Institute,
Hence, the hoop stress can be used to decide the diameter (diameter ∝ hoop stress) of the pressure vessel and choose convenient material with required material strength.
For instance, the pitch segment may be dark and the hardener segment may be white, so that the subsequent blend turns into a uniform dim. An example of the epoxy resin compound can be infused into a little compartment. Uncalled for blending would be indicated by streakiness, or by non-uniform shading, or both. If both of the above rules is not met, all weight grouting operations ought to stop until appropriate healing move has been made.
Because of the porous nature of a tile and grout floor, they are very difficult to keep clean. Recent innovations in technology restoration have made it possible to make a tile floor look new and be much easier to keep clean than the original surface. No matter what the previous condition and how unattractive the floor was, the new restoration technology will bring it back to life. This new and advanced restoration technology is a step above basic cleaning because it also installs durable coatings to the surface of the tile as well as the grout joints.
Where σ1 and σ2 are the stresses at temperatures T1 and T2. Calculating the values for t at different values temperatures values shows that the stress strain curve is not dependent on the temperature.
Graphite is one of the softest known materials, while diamond is the hardest known material.
The purpose of this experiment was to observe the different kind of crystal package arrangements that each material experienced after an impact load. For this reason, a varying range of temperatures were used during the experiment. As a result, comparing the effects that temperatures had on the types of fractures each material experimented.
If the polyethyne plastics have a composition of more carbon, it will be able to take more stress with less side effects. The more carbon will make the plastics stronger
Carboxyl- or amine-terminated copolymers of butadiene and acrylonitrile (CTBN and ATBN, respectively) are soluble in most liquid epoxies. The end groups react with the epoxy matrix during the curing process and the rubber separates to form discrete particles. Increasing the fracture resistance of epoxies with CBTN or ABTN rubber particles does have deficiencies. Incorporation of a low-Tg component often reduces the glass transition temperature of the composite material [12]. Similarly, incomplete separation of the rubber during cure may plasticize the epoxy network [14, 15]. Both the tensile modulus and yield strength of epoxies may be reduced upon rubber modification [16]. Sultan and McGarry [17] attributed the toughening effect mainly to the crazing of the epoxy matrix. Bascom et al.[12] accredited the high toughness values of CTBN modified epoxy to an increase in the plastic zone size. A rubber stretching and tearing mechanism was proposed by Kunz et al. [18] as the major toughening mechanism for rubber modified plastics (also known as
SBR, NBR, EPDM, CR and Silicone. Hardness from 35 to 80 shore A. The most popular material is SBR 65+/-5 Shore A. For special purpose rubber grommets, such as good aging, high temperature resistance….. silicone rubber is a better choice.
Recently, the use of nanomaterials is increasing day by day in the various fields such as biomedicine, automobile, electronics, robotics, construction industry etc. This is mainly because of unique mechanical, chemical, electronic and optical properties of nanomaterials. Particularly, construction industry may possibly be one of the chief beneficiaries of these materials, because the properties of concrete, steel, glass and other building materials will improve with the applications of nanomaterials. Therefore, the potential use of nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes, Cu nanoparticles, Ag nanoparticles, TiO2, SiO2, Al2O3, ZrO2, and Fe2O3 nano-oxides for enhancing the mechanical strengths and durability of concrete have been explored in the current study. It has been observed that the addition of nanomaterials would improve the corrosion resistance, abrasion resistance, compressive strength, tensile strength, flexural strength etc. of cementitious composites. However, the exact mechanism responsible for improvement in the characteristics of nano based cementitious materials is not clear so far. Thus, more researches and investigations are required in order to use the nanomaterials in civil engineering and construction sector effectively.