Essay HCS 451 Organizational Performance Management

The Joint Commission has targeted solution tools (TST) applicable to the Joint Commission standards and National Patient Safety Goals covering; value-based purchasing/pay for performance (P4P), healthcare-acquired conditions, hospital readmissions, risk reduction, staff education. There are more tools The Joint Commission provides which are: Leading Practice Library, Standards BoosterPak, Core Measure Solution Exchange, Portals:HAI, High Reliability, and Trasitions of Care, FSA and Intracycle Monitoring Process,

Even though Texas Health Resources approach is uninterrupted throughout this study with the sole purpose of endorsing of quality assurance and maneuvering to brand core measurements attained. The key to the leaders involved in this organization study is to convey, examine, make improvements, collaborate, and initiate changes within the hospital, which this study principally is engrossed on bringing crucial argument and descriptions to light. Precisely monitoring the study there were several references concerning how Texas Health Harris Methodist- Cleborne recuperated their performance and quality assurance by the 15th percentile from Texas Health Resources its parent organization. This organization 's theory used would be a resources dependence theory. Authority was assumed to this same organization Texas Health Resources with anticipation to produce and improve a new core resource model for clinical outcomes and this theory would be an independent variable theory. Numerous quality encouragements were set up for employees to promote their performances which demonstrates the hierarchy of needs theory. For the reason that, this demonstrates that the Texas Health Resources constructs all the results regarding what transpires and gives Texas Health Harris Methodist -Cleborne the approval to acquire a new position of clinical outcomes specialists, that what focus on the daily functions within their organization. Established on their discoveries, reports showed that part of her

Like mentioned above, JCAHO is a nonprofit organization that accredits institutions consistent with requirements and policies they need to abide by. Their mission is, “To continuously improve health care for the public, in collaboration with other stakeholders, by evaluating health care organizations and inspiring them to excel in providing safe and effective care of the highest quality and value” (The Joint Commission, 2015) and their vision is “All people always experience the safest, highest quality, best value health care across all settings”. This organization was found in 1951 where they intended to continuously improve health care for the

The joint commission on accreditation of healthcare organization (JCAHO), which is currently known as the Joint Commission, is a private and non-profit making organization. This represents non-governmental operations but separately as an independent body. The main aim of the organization is to develop the safety of the public healthcare, and the quality of service provided by health organizations. Safety and quality is measured by the compliance to the standards provided by the joint commission. Its members include the ADA (American Dental Association), AMA (American Medical Association), and (ACP) American College of Physicians among others. Those members that comply fully with the standards of the joint commission are regarded with respect of the best service providers. Organizations with the reputation usually attract more practitioners and clients (Uselton et al 2010).

The article The standard of healthcare accreditation standards by Greenfield, Pawsey, Hinchcliff, Moldovan, Braithwaite (2012) talks about how health care accreditation standards are advocated and used as a way to express the importance of improving clinical practices as well as organizational performance in Hospitals. These agencies have documented methodologies that will help develop

JCAHO is an abbreviation for Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations is a non-for-profit organization that seeks to continuously improve the safety and quality of care provided to the public through the provision of health care accreditation and related services that support performance improvement in health care organizations. It is an organization made up of individuals from the private medical sector to develop and maintain standards of quality in medical facilities in the United States. Although JCAHO has no legal enforcement power, and has no official connection to the US Government regulatory agencies, many medical facilities

The purpose of this paper is to discuss my hospital system, The Cleveland Clinic’s, organizational quality department, structure, and programs. Health care reform, accountability, quality care, and patient safety have become the foundation of a reliable hospital system (Huber, 2014). This paper will answer several questions regarding the organizational quality program at my hospital, including management structure, improvement projects, staff involvement, techniques utilized, staff communication, and evaluation of quality effectiveness. I will also provide two examples of a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative that has been successful in my organization.

Providing health care, of adequate quality and standard, is challenging and complex process that requires oversight from regulatory agencies such as accreditation. Accreditation as defined by Cochrane (2014) is the process of establishing a standard of minimum standard while confirming peer-reviewable achievement of excellence or best practice and promotes continuous learning and improvement. Health care organization through accreditation can provide excellence and comparing a business function or activity, a product, or an enterprise as a whole with that standard--will be used increasingly by healthcare institutions to reduce expenses and simultaneously improve product and service quality. Accreditation can greatly impact the external and internal functions of an organization by greatly effecting finances, associated costs, and time towards earning and maintaining accreditation. By looking at the purpose and standards associated with accreditation health care organization will be able to better understand the impact it has on the organization.

As the book explains, health care organizations are utilizing a scoring system that concentrates to improve on performance and productivity which will give effective information on how well that organization is working. Unfortunately, there are some organizations that may try to use over use the measurement process and can ultimately have a negative effect. The administration and leadership side needs to be on the same page and focus mainly on the performance improvement efforts and not lose site of their overall effectiveness. Each scorecard and dashboard need to be used according to the level of focus, for example, with governance, organizational performance measures should be the main concentration, leadership should have the main focus

Accreditation and quality measures have been expressed in concerns for the absence of relation to one another. Another concern is surveyor issues. “Reliability is noted as being a critical issue in accreditation, and in health care more broadly” (Sollecito & Johnson, 2013, p.524). Another significant issue is “separating the costs and benefits associated with accreditation and those incurred independently as part of an organization’s ongoing quality and safety efforts” (Sollecito & Johnson, 2013, p. 524). When looking to the future of accreditation in health care the biggest concern lies within the survey process. Improvement in consistency is the key. “The ultimate goal is to push healthcare organizations to embed foundational standards and continuous survey readiness into their organizations and daily operations so that accreditation is seen as less of an event and more of a validation of the safe and effective care organizations provide every day” (Reichard,

Glickman, S. W., Baggett, K. A., Krubert, C. G., Peterson, E. D., & Schulman, K. A. (2007). Promoting quality: the health-care organization from a management perspective. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 341-348.

Healthcare providers are being pressured to improve clinical quality at lower prices and achieved the higher standards of care. Healthcare organizations are challenged to maintain high performance services. The essential structural elements to have high performance organizations are management, leadership, human capital and group

Accreditation is one of the regulation mechanism which addresses performance or capability of organisational only. It is usually a voluntary method administrated by non-governmental bodies (NGO), where external peer reviewers assist and evaluate a health care facilities compliance with

The philosophy of performance is linked to the methods used for measuring the employee’s skills, addressing skill gaps, and the approach for delivering effective performance feedback. Performance is “A way to ensure that individual employees or teams know what is expected of them, and that they stay focused on effective performance by

According to Caldwell (2002, pp 8), performance management is defined as a “proactive partnership between employees and management that helps employees perform at their best and alight their contributions with the goals, values and initiatives of the organisation”.