As expected trump won all the solid red states and major swing states like Texas and Ohio. Such support was adequate to swamp Clinton's support among nonwhite voters in states like Florida and North Carolina, and fueled him to his stunning bombshell triumphs in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. In spite of an absence of political experience deep down inside I thought Donald Trump would come out on top in the US presidential decisions do to the fact all the craziness that was going on with Hillary. Obviously regardless of a progression of contentions his message resounded with a colossal number of American voters in key states, and uncovered profound anarchistic outrage and discontent. Donald Trump won Texas on the quality of enormous edges with white and …show more content…
Hillary Clinton had a very slim chance in winning Texas over Trump. A Democratic presidential candidate has not carried Texas since 1976 so I knew it would nearly be impossible for Hillary.
At the point when Election Day unfolded, every one of the surveyors and political insiders in the nation had Hillary Clinton waltzing into the White House. By the time surveys had shut across the nation on Tuesday night, those projections had been left in shambles simply like the ones a year back that everything except precluded the likelihood of Donald Trump winning the Republican Party's presidential designation. Trump had scored enormously noteworthy disturbed triumphs in Florida, North Carolina and Wisconsin basic swing states where practically every open survey and most private projections had indicated Clinton ahead. Some indicated the likelihood of "shrouded Trump voters," who were humiliated to concede even namelessly to surveyors that they wanted to vote for Trump. Others indicated the surge in force Trump got when the FBI declared 11 days before the decision that it was looking into new confirmation identified with its examination concerning the treatment of touchy data by
On November 8th, 2016, the United States will finally have its presidential election for the 45th President of the United States of America. This election will be a grating race between a number of political parties and their respective nominees. Two parties are more notable than the others, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. The Democratic Party has a well-known nominee; Hillary Clinton, who has served as secretary of state, and has been the senator of New York, she has also been the first lady of the U.S while her husband, former president Bill Clinton was in office (Hillary For America). Mrs. Hillary Clinton is mainly a candidate for president because of her experience and great attributes. Alongside Clinton is Mr. Donald J. Trump, who is the respective presidential nominee for the Republican Party. Donald Trump is a well-known billionaire real estate personnel, who rose up to his status due to his great business intellect (Donald Trump Biography). In like matter, there are other nominees for president; however, Trump and Clinton are the two that are most significant and one if not the other will eventually overtake the position as President of the United States. Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are formidable
In 2012 President Obama spoke to a group of people at a fund raiser event in Texas and seemed optimistic that Texas would soon be a battleground for the Democratic Party (Parker, 2013). Unless Democrats possess an extraordinary strategic plan this could prove to be a challenging task to accomplish. Recent voting in Texas has faithfully been favorable toward the Republican ticket for over 30 years (Parker, 2013). There has been a widespread margin in the percentage of votes between Republican and Democratic candidates in the last four presidential elections. Currently Republicans occupy all elected statewide offices, both state
This recent election that took place on November 8, 2016 included candidate Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Towards the beginning of the election the results seemed that Hillary would win and was taking
This could be interpreted as proof that Texas may be changing to some extent, but I think the reason Trump won by a smaller margin is because of his plans for the wall between Mexico and Texas and the changing demographics.
Although Burr was never able to reach 50% in the polls, he exceeded that threshold on Election Day and defeated Ross by almost 6%. In order to analyze the political climate further, I will be comparing the exit polls for both Trump vs. Clinton and Burr vs Ross. This will help explain why Ross was entering the Senate race with a disadvantage despite media pundits arguing that higher turnout in presidential election years should benefit Ross. Although Five Thirty Eight gave Clinton the slight edge to defeat Trump in North Carolina, Trump’s was able to carry the state with a modest performance. Although Real Clear Politics had Burr winning by an average of 2%, that was certainly below the 5.7% final result. In a three way race between Trump, Clinton, and Johnson, Trump was predicted to win North Carolina by about 1%. The actual results, however, showed Trump winning by about 4%. Although this paper is focusing on the Senate race, it’s certainly important to note the impact that a presidential candidate can have on the electoral map, particularly
The night of the election it seemed as if the Vice President and candidate for the Democratic Party was poised for a close victor. As the polls closed along the eastern seaboard, exit polling information indicated a clear, but narrow lead for the Vice President as he still need to secure Florida and two states totaling 15 electoral votes or more to win the Presidency (Toobin, 18). At 7:49 EST, NBC called Florida and the election for Gore, and so did 2 of the 4 major television networks did the same in the following minutes. As the night continued Gore secured Minnesota and New Mexico, but confusion in exit polling data had led to a premature call for Gore (18, Toobin). As the red eye hours of the morning continued all four media outlets reported a flood of data from Volusia County, Daytona Beach put Bush up by more than 50,000 votes, thus the media outlets followed suit and eventually called Florida for Bush. Although a questionable disappearance of
How did that"—"Donald Trump has won the state of Wisconsin, whoa." But earlier in the evening, remember, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, all the way up—we ran up the East Coast. And, you know, the Republicans have a tremendous disadvantage in the Electoral College, you know that. Tremendous disadvantage. And to run the whole East Coast, and then you go with Iowa and Ohio, and all of the different states. It was a great evening, one that a lot people will never forget—a lot of people. Not going to forget that
Current President Trump won Florida by being both an active campaigner and by tapping into the underlying swing state voter mentality. With Flordia not having one state wide party, it means the state is anyone’s game. Focusing on in person appearance while targeting not just his own party but other parties voters and the independent vote made all the difference. While not a politician, Trump
“Texas became a state in December 1845, participating in its first presidential election in 1848. Texas seceded from the Union in 1861 and was not included in the 1864 or 1868 elections. From 1872 through 1976, Texas went Democratic in the vast majority of elections. However, that changed in 1980, and Texas has sided with the Republicans ever since” (www.270towin.com). Unsurprisingly, Texas went red in this most recent presidential election, thus giving all 38 of their electoral college votes to President-elect Trump.
The 2016 presidential election seemed to be a particularly hectic election. On November 8,2016, I was checking my Facebook newsfeed. As I scrolled through my newsfeed, I see a lot of posts related to the election. People would post opinions on each of the presidential candidates as well as which their predictions of which candidate will win. The newspaper websites provided frequent updates throughout the day to inform people about the progress of the election. That night, I watched tentatively as the ballots were being counted, and I saw people’s comments of shock and disbelief when Trump managed to get ahead of Hillary in terms of electoral college votes.
Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton was born on October 26, 1947 in Chicago, Illinois, and was raised in Park Ridge, Illinois, a suburb 15 mile NW of Chicago. She was the oldest of three children, having two younger brothers. Hillary was very young when she became active in politics. She attended young Republican groups and campaigned for Barry Goldwater in 1964. She attended Wellesley College, where she was active in student politics and elected senior class president. After graduating in 1969, she went on to attend Yale Law School, where she met Bill Clinton. After graduating with honors from Yale in 1973, she enrolled at the Yale Child Study Center. This is where she took courses for children and medicine and completed one post-graduate year
Even though Trump’s win is a bit of a scare to some in America and the Republican party, what really stood out in this party’s primary was the runner ups following Trump’s clear win. Many had thought Republican candidate Cruz would be second runner up, but shockingly other candidate John Kasich followed Trump with 16% in the vote. Throughout the rest of the primaries, candidates Bush and Cruz had been a battle for third place with both having 11%, while Rubio had trailed in at 9%. Although Cruz and Rubio’s failure had been a bit predicted, no one would have predicted the first runner up to be not too talked about candidate Kasich. It seemingly similar to the Democratic candidate Sanders who at first everyone thought would not succeed in these presidential campaigns, but winds up winning the hearts of many Americans. The close race between the two went on for a couple hours, slowly rising and falling in the percentiles for Bush and Cruz. Once all the votes were in, the clear winner in third place of the primaries was Bush with 17%, Cruz at 12%, and Rubio at
When I drew up this map on Friday, there was a part of me that was hoping to be proven wrong on election day. At the same time, the plausibility of a Republican win was in the realm of possibility for me because of the people I have seen supporting the now president-elect.
Donald Trump was elected president of the United States of America on November 8th, 2016, and now has been running our country for over a year. As Trump’s first year in office slowly began, his reputation seems to be creating different outside views of our nation and arguments started producing everywhere. After competing with Hillary Clinton for the presidential term in office, Trump defeated her along with her democratic supporters causing one of the most shocking elections in U.S. history. Using public media web pages, we are reviewing both sides of the argument regarding Trump’s election and we are going to decipher why each arguer supports their side, and why each side is reasonable for the benefit of our country.
Donald’s Trump’s victory in the 2016 election is very complex. The political mishaps that have occurred since JFK’s presidency reshaped the American psyche of who the president should be. This chain of dissatisfaction with the federal government led the American people to hope for a president who is honest, free of corruption, and supportive of the middle class. Trump recognized the American need for a new kind of president and took on a persona that perfectly exemplified this. The Trump Mythology is the belief that Donald Trump is a transparent, honest politician; however, this is only part of the equation. Belief in the Trump Mythology contributed to his victory, but it is also important to acknowledge the respective roles of demographics, voter turnout, and Hillary Clinton’s flaws. An interesting difference between the Kennedy Mythology and the Trump Mythology that is worth noting is the role of the media. Throughout the Kennedy Era, popular media fed the people’s fascination of Kennedy’s Camelot, perpetuating the mythology. Donald Trump, however, was largely hated by popular culture. American media ultimately discounted Donald Trump as a viable contender for the presidency.