preview

How Can You Decide Which View To Accept?

Decent Essays

In each of the three scenarios presented in the case, opponents and proponents have divergent views of government regulations. One view is on the public benefit, the other is on the cost to private industry. How can you decide which view to accept? In all three of these scenarios I would agree that regulations are increasingly necessary.
Time delays and increased costs have greater importance than putting the general public at risk via terrorist activity or environmental danger. Unfortunately, many of these costs will be forced on to the consumer but it would inevitably become an associated cost of goods. The alternative would be a company’s investment into better screening technology for cargo which would increase their speed and potentially give them …show more content…

Corporations never want to see costs rise but it is the governments job to serve and protect the people and that may force the private sector to adjust with the times and technologies required to serve an increasing population and global market.
2. In each of the scenarios above, identify the benefits versus the costs for both viewpoints. For the airline industry, it is cost and time prohibitive to require stricter policies for air travel for both government agencies and private businesses but these costs can effectively be transferred on to consumers as long as the costs are spread out accordingly. W ith increased safety people would be more likely to increase their air travel and help to off-set the costs of these new processes.

This scenario is similar with increasing EPA guidelines for engine emissions; although tighter regulation will increase the cost of production, these are costs that pale in comparison to the global impact lack of regulation could impose on the global community. Increased costs of production and jobs will increase the associated costs but these costs are incurred for the safety of the population and environment.

Get Access