preview

How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson Dbq

Decent Essays

Jackson DBQ: To what extent was Andrew Jackson and democratic president? Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States, was the leader of a very unprecedented revolution in the country during the 1820 to 1830s. He claimed to be a common man and to be a representative for the common man. Jackson and his supporters preached that he was going to advance democracy and take power away from the rich and give it to the people. While Jackson and his administration did help boost American democracy, much of those changes were motivated by self interest and Jackson’s backwards and racist ideology. Jackson failed to recognize that a democratic nation also is government that values and protects equality, justice, the law, and civil rights. …show more content…

The aforementioned cartoon also addresses Jackson’s fight against the Bank of the US. In his Bank Veto message to Congress, Jackson said, “it is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes” (Richardson’s A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, 1789-1902, 1905). This quote is very ironic because Jackson himself was a rich (infact he was richer than President Quincy Adams), powerful man who as seen in the John Marshall incident bent the acts of government to entertain his own racist views. Daniel Webster Addresses this in his reply to Jackson’s veto, “(President Jackson’s message) extends the grasp of (the chief executive) over every power of the government...Liberty is in danger [because] it manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich...” (Webster 1832). Jackson was using his prejudices and self-interest of stopping the so called ‘aristocrats’ running against him to make decisions. The effects of Jackson’s war on the Bank of the U.S. ultimately lead to the Panic of 1837 and several economic consequences. Jackson neglected the Constitution and the consequences of his actions due to his inflated ego and his own …show more content…

Jackson rewarded those who supported him and created an incentive. Jackson’s Secretary of State Van Buren, “...offered (Jackson) advice...[concerning] the appointment of the collector of the Port of New York…[The] post needed a man of the highest integrity...When Van Buren learned that Jackson intended to appoint Samuel Swartwout to the office he almost collapsed” (Remini’s The Life of Andrew Jackson, 1988). Samuel Swartwout had “criminal tendencies” but Jackson ignored Van Buren’s advice because “he [Swartwout] had been an early support” and ultimately Swartwout stole $1,222,705.09. Jackson’s bad judgment and refusal to listen to his own council, because of his own selfishness cost the country,

Get Access