How Does The News We See On Social Media Differ From What We 're Being Presented With On Television

62% of people get their news off social media, but does social media give you all the information that news anchors do? Some news cast gives you everything on Black Lives Matter and some news cast gives you their opinion which can sometimes be biased. Most people read one news article and go on about their opinion on the subject, but if they went out and explored different news articles would they still have the same opinion?

In this new day and age we are granted with advanced technology that helps every one of us. A major capability that we now have is the capacity to spread information like no other. The television and internet are major sources to access material and influence the masses. The question becomes whether these sources really inform the people, or just put information out that benefits the few. Evening news is where the breaking stories take place and where we can see the difference in channel ideology. Citizens have a right to know what is going on in the country but due to biases we see this fail. This causes televison to poison the electoral system, glorify conflicts, and polarize views.

Every single American across the United States have watched the news at least once in their lifetime in today’s culture. With the simple flick of a TV remote, you can have access to a multitude of different networks broadcasting across the globe. This does not include the internet where here you can search for anything at any time. Both these new technologies have really grown the news scene in the past few decades or so, changing how citizens view the news. This vast network can bring you breaking news in an instance and nothing goes unnoticed in this society today. Since the beginning of mankind, there have always been separate groups on different views of society. Many believe that today the different broadcasting stations have become echo

Is television news still a good way to obtain solid information? When it comes to television news, most people would agree that they believe they are receiving good, reliable information. However, the media that the public sees and hears today is a lot different from what was reported about eighty years ago, a time when Edward Murrow was covering World War II through the radio and sharing unbiased news around the country. His honest reporting allowed him to gain the trust of the audience and helped shape a path on how news should be reported. Nearly eighty years after Edward Murrow’s unbiased reports, an analysis using “The Elements of Journalism” was applied on K-ABC 11 o 'clock late night news. After three nights of thoroughly studying K-ABC news, the data that was collected is far from what people may actually realize. Even though viewers may feel that by watching a well-known network, like K-ABC, for their daily news is legitimate and truthful, the elements that Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel share in “The Elements of Journalism” are almost completely absent. There is a filter amongst each television network that is shielding the public from need to know news; during the three nights there was about five minutes of news coverage that is considered need to know information. The remainder twenty-five to thirty minutes of the program was then divided into other subcategories: an average of five minutes on sport news, an average of eleven and a half minutes dedicated to

Media today has become extremely corrupt while spreading news about today’s politics. Today 's new articles on politics are usually either bias, the story is slightly altered, or the information in the articles are just found to be rumors later on. There aren’t many news sources today that are producing reliable articles that aren’t biased one way or another towards politics. I believe that all sources of media today have had a combined negative impact on politics today because people use news media it to spread false information and social media is abuse when people use it to attack others in inappropriate ways.

Although getting news through the mail is more comfortable, up-to-date, and has more information for non-tech, well-informed people; online sources are faster, immediately accessible from any device, and its free. After a few years of growing up, some people would rather stick to physical newspaper at the tips of their fingers rather than having to go through tough times with new technology. These two topics both have positives, as for one might prefer flipping through paper rather than going through screen titles, but these also have negatives. If someone considers one of these options, which for some is an easy choice to pick from, while for others, it is difficult. In these times, technology is rarely stopping for those who would need to catch up on. For example, old people don’t understand technology and would rather stay informed through the newspaper that they are comfortable with, for my claim to be supported by those who prefer a more comfortable choice, either with paper or technology. To figure out which one is better fitting, we need to state out the benefits of each choice. In my opinion, I would rather get informed through social media or other social platforms, it is more convenient to get daily news faster right when I wake up, rather than going through different ruffles of paper just to see what I’m looking for. With technology, there’s a better way to get sources faster than ever before.

In what ways has the ‘new media’ and the changing technology of political reporting affected its quality and availability?

American media consumers turn to news outlets to watch updates about events that affect them directly, such as local news and congressional developments, and to learn more about complex topics related to the world at large. At focal moments in history, for example like presidential elections, the news media play a crucial role in helping people make informed judgments about the people and issues they read about and watch in news clips. Fake news in social media is a growing problem, influenced by propaganda and being a citizen’s main source for news it has not been more pronounced than in recent years. As internet technologies improve and evolve, this type of information has become more abundant and readily available. However, as sources of fake news and other propaganda also become more complicated, American media users are realizing that they must turn a critical eye to the news stories that they read and share through social media.

Media surrounds us, it makes up a substantial part of our modern lives, and we rely on it for almost all of the information we encounter. There are two main types of news sites; corporate and independent. With corporate news we see things through a lens, whether it be for better or for worse. Facts can be twisted, information left out, and the truth made unclear. Independent news is usually more reliable for the whole truth, but this is not always the case. With independent news, we run the risk of reading news through the eyes of a single, possibly prejudiced writer, one who distorts the truth or has uncertain facts to begin with. For example, the recent event of the 2016 shooting in Louisiana and the response to protests can be used to provide a great display of how corporate and independent news sites differ. It can be used to show that certain news sites we and many others rely on can often be inaccurate and provide false information to the general populace to cover bureaucratic and private interest agendas, but can also be used to further personal knowledge and promote self-growth.

Information Technology has revolutionised the way through which people access information. Chen’s article, “Newspapers fold as readers defect and economy sours” shows this by detailing the collapse of the newspaper industry and its replacement by online news. Prior to the widespread availability of the internet, consumers were forced to rely on newspapers and television to find out the news of the world. These comparatively old medias are offered to the public on a delay due to the process of printing and production. However, the internet now offers news and information to these same people, free of charge and on demand.

As the world becomes a global village due to technology our society changes with it. We become more and more civilized that our way of life must change to match the changes in our world. One of the most common changes that have hit our today’s society is media. Media has penetrated through all barriers including our war fronts and areas where man never thought to have penetrated. As media develops through the years and technology expands more media outlets open and so the society has and continues to move away from the mainstream media (CBS, NBC, Fox News, CNN, ABC, etc.) to local media and different websites to get their news. The trust society had in Television and the mainstream media to provide true and uncontaminated reports has faded and therefore society is moving away from these to where they believe they can get news first hand. In this paper, I will attempt to explain why in today 's media many people don 't just rely on the major networks but go online for news (Local, National, and Global). Could this be splintering our views and causing more anger? Should it be regulated? I will also attempt to express my opinion on what the business of news is becoming in the next ten years.

For a long time, people receive news on the printed source such as newspaper, magazine which published by newspaper company or publishing company. A little while a go, people got another news source which are radio and television. Most country start with public broad casting and while later, the radio or television company established and start broadcasting own programs. Both literary media and broad casting mass media are mostly driven by big company and each of those company has own political stance or sponsor and those factor heavily reflected to the articles or programs they published. Back in the days, these biased article provide versatility to individual issues. For example the press called Partisan Press which has clear political bias and it attracted the different group of people.(Sikka, Week4 Lecture) The issue now publish and broadcast media is lack of versatility by concentration of the ownership. Consequence of the capitalism society, many of the company which produce news bought by bigger powerful company and it end up with under around 10 company are owning media nowadays and this concentration of media ownership leads to the lack of versatility.(Lorimer, 249) After the internet technology available to the public, the issue of versatility starts to solve gradually by individual’s blog or the rapid rising of micro-blog service use such as “Twitter”. The characteristic of the internet that it differ from old media, individual able to be an journalist and there

The effect of the media on our daily lives is just too big to ignore. The media’s opinion can form and shape many of people’s opinions, specially those who don’t have a background on certain subjects. They would tend to chose a certain person from the media to feed them the information they need about certain things. In our case the thing many people may not know about it, is politics, to be more specific the elections 2015, the candidates, their policies, platforms, etc… . I will be talking about a specific point in the platforms on different parties. And I will be looking on how the media’s effect led to the choice

Social media is affecting the way a local television news station presents information to its audience and how its audience in turn receives information. The adoption of social media, in particular Twitter and Facebook have made a significant impact on how people choose to receive their news and information

on the different types of media to provide the information that we seek. From the news to your