How Successful Has the Welfare State Been in Delivering Equality?

Equal opportunities mean exactly what it says. Pupils are all doing the same job- learning

Offering equality of opportunity to all your learners means making sure that you are up to date with your knowledge on the Equality act 2010:

The idea of the welfare state can mean something different in each and every country. There is an ideal model of the welfare state which is where society accepts the responsibility for things such as the ground work and the provision of wide ranging and

Article 29- Children's education should develop each child's personality, talents and abilities to the fullest. They should also learn to live peacefully and respect the environment and other people.

And attempted to accomplish William Beveridge proposal of the welfare state by introducing reforms to establish the Welfare State that came to challenge “lasses-faire” notions of state. A welfare state is the state that looks after the basic needs of its people. This should freedom people from need, universal provision for all and comprehensive in that it covers all types of need. It was establish because of the impact of World War II and the Beveridge Report.

The welfare systems are based on the principle of public responsibility on equitable wealth distribution and equality of opportunities to citizens who are unable to afford minimal levels of quality and good life, through provision of universal education programs, health care and subsidised housing. In most of the states, welfare systems are not used in the right manner they are intended to. Although the systems are meant to reduce the poverty level and at least assists individuals to get decent jobs, many recipients develops news ways every year to prolong their dependency in the system. Statistics show that women easily abuse the welfare system by simply having more children each year since this means that more money will come in their mails. Most of the recipients on welfare are able to work

Over the last 25 years many policies have been introduced in education. Some critic’s say that an education market has been created but others disagree and say that the policies have helped create equality of opportunity.

Equality of Opportunity is the idea that all persons in a society are given equal opportunities to achieve educational and financial equality by having the chance to enter any occupation or social class. Schools play a paramount role in providing equality of opportunity as they are responsible for its implementation. Many issues exist for schools to provide equality of education due mostly to a family’s economic condition. Contributory factors such as a student’s cultural background, which test model is implemented at a given school, discrimination in the labor market that disrupts the achievement of equality of opportunity, all affect the school’s ability to implement equality of opportunity. Another important factor is the inequality between schools that contribute to the inequality of opportunity.

In America today, just over ten million people are on unemployment insurance, one hundred and ten million people are on welfare, and the total government spending annually is around one hundred and thirty billion dollars (Welfare Statistics). The welfare state is a political system based on the proposition that the government has the individual responsibility to ensure that the minimum standard of living is met for all citizens. Specifically, in the matters of health care, public education, employment, and social security, the welfare state assumes all responsibility. According to John Rawls, “In a just society the liberties of equal citizenship are taken as settled; the rights secured by justice are not subject to political bargaining or to the calculus of social interests. The only thing that permits us to acquiesce in an erroneous theory is the lack of a better one; analogously, an injustice is tolerable only when it is necessary to avoid an even greater injustice“(Rawls). In the 1840s, Otto Von Bismarck, the first Chancellor of Germany, was the father of the modern welfare state. He built the program to win over the support of the working middle class in Germany and ultimately reduce the outflow of immigrants to the U.S., where welfare did not exist (Welfare State). In the United States, not all companies provided workers with benefits, thus the workers appealed to the government, giving rise to the first form of welfare capitalism.

In conclusion the Welfare State was created on the principle that the state accepted a responsibility to protect and promote the welfare of all citizens. It must be noted that the system was designed to provide a national minimum, not reduce inequalities. I have looked in detail at all aspects to combat the “five giants “and the popular support when the Beveridge report was introduced. I have also looked at flaws in the system, however the cornerstone of the Beveridgian welfare system, was left almost untouched until the 1980’s.

According to the Equality act, (2010) [When providing for learners they should all be treated equally despite] age, sex, sexual orientation,

What is a complete welfare state in my definition? In a complete welfare state, every one enjoy equal benefit as a human being. United State, when found 241 years ago, have held the value that “All men created equal”. Government should provide equal health care access to every citizen. Government should also coordinate the wealth redistribution to minimize the wealth inequality.

By definition, the welfare state is a means of giving assistance to those who do not produce an arbitrary amount of recorded capital for themselves. There is absolutely no encouragement to work, no obligation for productivity. Rather, the Heritage Foundation reported that only two of 80 tested welfare programs in America had

The aim of this essay is to discuss and compare the British Welfare system with Germany and Sweden’s welfare systems. A welfare system is the structure of welfare provisions and services that provide a specific social need, but it is not only provided or organised solely by the government (Blakemore, 2001). It is a view that is rooted in individual exchanges between five organisations (State/Government, Market/Private Sector, Family/Kin networks, Local Communities and Civil Society). It reflects the history and cultures of different countries around the world (Haralambos, 2012). It is these providers that assume principal

Inequality is the inevitable outcome of capitalism. It provides incentive for those who own the modes of production, the capitalists, to invest back into the system as well as for those who sell their labours to work productively. However, this system does many times only benefit the capitalists, while leaving a large portion of the population insecure. To attend to these insecurities and minimize the level of inequality, states implement policies and programs that provide their citizens safety nets. These are known as welfare states. Models and theories of welfare state are highly influenced by the experiences of the Western world. In these state social provisioning came to be due to economic growth, labour mobilization and coalition. So, it brings into question if it can be applied to the rest of the world. This paper will argue that the welfare state literature is inapplicable to the Global South as the writings and understandings needs and conditions are highly Eurocentric. It lacks to take into consideration historical context that has led these states to their current conditions, as well as the current global system that further perpetuates it.