Imagine a time in which rebels swarmed army officials and attacked them. Or millions of people reviling British soldiers because they were doing their job clearly and well. This time was none other than the American Revolution. A time where American rebels mercilessly took on the British Soldiers because they felt that their rights were violated. But I feel that the British were right where they stood and all of their policies and regulations were justified. They were right because the rebels were still part of British government and were still the king’s subjects so they had to obey the king, and the rebels didn’t have the right to name their own nation independent because they still followed the Parliaments rules. And lastly they were colonists sent on an expedition that the king agreed …show more content…
They treated their regulations very badly when they rebelled against the king. In fact the subjects opposed to the taxes oppressed on them even though it was rightfully laid upon. The colonists protested “No taxation without representation” but the British Parliament had all rights to tax because it was the sovereign of the British Government. At the same time the British Government taxed its citizens as well using their way to tax. There was no difference between the way they were taxed, and the rebels opposed to it thinking it was violating their rights. What rights state that even if the British taxed their own English subjects the rights of the colonists were violated? Plus it seems silly of an idea to allow a nation more than 3000 miles apart to have a say in government that may not only affect their nation. The colonists pleaded for a say in Government but it was ridiculed by the Parliament because the colonists didn’t realize the stature in England present at that time. Their main motive behind it was to get a say for their own nation which is not only what the Parliament
Many colonists were angered because of high taxes England chose to enforce on them. These taxes were a result of the British participation and victory in the French and Indian war. However, what made the colonists even more angry was the fact that they were being taxed without representation in England’s Parliament. The colonists thought that, in order to be taxed by the British, they should have representation in it. They saw it as unfair to be taxed by a government they had no say in. As Patrick Henry said in his speech made to the Virginia House of Burgesses, “We can under law be taxed only by our own representatives...The Stamp Act is against the law. We must not obey it…” (Doc. 1). Since many colonists thought this taxation broke the law, some of them chose to protest by going to the House of Burgesses, boycotting imports, or simply not paying it in response. This response is justified; if
The British were cruel, forceful, and just plain mean. Colonists asked the British for their rights, but no, the British would not give them their rights. Britain was a horrible country, and they didn’t listen to the Colonists, although they were usually right.
Imagine a country where the government could do anything they wanted because it was simply their “right.” The revolution was caused by a series of events which were started by the king passing taxes on the colonists and enforcing laws which were violating the civilians natural rights. There has been an argument since the war started about whether the colonists were justified in declaring independence and breaking away from their home country. The American colonists were justified in waging war for independence against Britain because the british government ignored countless formal petitions sent, the government didn’t have the right to impose taxes on the settlers, and Britain waged war against the colonists.
To begin with, the British government abused its power. Parliament passed many laws and taxes which infuriated the colonists. They were imposed for power, regulation, and money. These new laws encroached the freedoms of the colonists. For example, the Sugar Act of 1764 increased the tax on sugar imported from the West Indies. The Quartering Act of 1765 required colonists to provide food and
It was important for the colonists to leave the British rules, so they no longer have to follow the laws and the punishment of the British . Back when the king had control over America meanings he gets to decide what he can do, he had control of the judges. Control of the judges was critical as it dealt with assigning guilt and innocent in the courts. In addition, the king also had enough power to decide the punishment on the when he or she is guilty party. The British government holds the right to make the colonist to pay more taxes. If they don’t, they can punish them according to the law. Also, on document K the King of Britain, king George the III “has created his own set of laws and now feels that he has a right to force us to give food and shelter to British soldiers, stop us from trading with the rest of the world, and has set up too many taxes for us that we have no choice in paying. He also wants to punish people without a fair trial and jury.” King George had enough power to create all kinds of laws that made it unfair for the colonists to lead prosperous lives. Once the colonists were victorious in overthrowing British rule,
James Otis mentions “No part of His Majesty’s dominions can be taxed without their consent… this would seem to [contradict] the theory of the constitution” which explains that the governed must have a say in what they will be taxed on and if not, the British Parliament is par taking in illegal actions. With no representation in Parliament, American colonists who felt the taxes to be a little excessive had no other option other than civil disobedience to rebel. It is safe to to say that the colonists had every right to rebel against the British.
The American Revolution was the first of its kind. Colonist rebelling against a supreme power, and successfully overthrowing Great Britain was at the time, something unheard of. In 1776, the colonist wrote the Declaration of Independence to declare independence from England. Over 200 years have passed since the American Revolution, and the question remains. Were the American colonist justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain? The answer to this question is yes, the American colonist were justified by taxes imposed by Britain, the Proclamation of 1763, and their unalienable rights being violated.
(Make intro stronger) Before 1760 England and Americas’ relationship was on good terms. The imperial system provided the America’s with many benefits such as political stability, opportunities for trade and commerce, and also military protection. During this time Great Britain was known as a world power and desired to remain that way. In response to wanting to remain a world power, Britain, during 1763- 1775 passed a series of laws that would allow them to gain more control over the colonies which would ultimately increase colonial taxes, control trade in the colonies and pass strict laws. These regulations caused the Colonies and Britain to have a tumultuous relationship, and the colonies warnings that these regulations were strenuous were
During the years previous to the American Revolution, Great Britain increasingly asserted its dominance over the colonies. This assertive behavior caused tension between the colonies and Great Britain. Therefore, colonies debated the pros and cons of going to war with Great Britain in order to declare their independence. Increased British control led to revolution by the acts Great Britain forced upon colonists, colonists lack of representation, and Great Britain’s reaction to protests held by the colonists. Great Britain’s increased control led to the Revolution by the acts they forced upon colonists.
The British Crown originally taxed the colonists to pay for the debt that was caused by the French and Indian War. Many colonists thought it unfair because they were being charged to pay a debt that they felt they did not owe. The rebellion started small, and grew over time. The British response was to create more acts and laws to suppress the colonists. The patriots’
Many people will tell you that American soldiers shouldn’t have disobeyed their “mother country”, Britain, just like a children should never disobey their mother. But people holding that opinion do not realize what Britain did to make the American colonists rebel. It all started in the 1750’s when Great Britain fought a war against the French and their Indian allies, called The French and Indian War. After the war, Britain began passing harsh laws for colonists to follow which made many very upset. Were the American colonists justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain? Americans were justified in declaring independence because British commanders made colonists open their homes to British soldiers, Britain passed harsh laws that
After the French and Indian War when England was in debt from fighting a war around the world, England just wanted the colonists to pay, not for the war that they had just been through, but for a portion of the protection that they are currently receiving from the British Troops. The amount the colonists were paying wasn't even a fourth of the amount necessary to sustain the protection that they were receiving (Document F). In order for England to receive their money, the British government began to enforce their Navigation Acts which allowed the promising of the American Colonial Economy to support the English Economy. The British were enforcing their Mercantilist policies keeping all the profits from the Colonies within the English Empire allowing England to exercise its control over the colonial economy. The British enforced taxes that the Colonists didn’t appreciate, they didn’t even care if the tax helped them monetarily like the Tea Act of 1773 which made the legal tea cheaper than illegal tea even with the tax. The Colonists believed in “No taxation, without representation,” a saying which ignited a spark within Colonists to stand up to the British government. Benjamin Franklin wrote a letter to put a stop to the Stamp Act which expressed his loyalty and love for England, but also showed that England should repeal their Act for the good of the colonies
Consequently, the British Parliament imposed taxation on the colonists in the 1760’s. The colonists resented this intrusion, for they felt they were not truly represented in the British government. Taxation without representation became the rallying cry of the colonists.
The unjust rules and regulations imposed on the American colonists through the 1760s and 70s inevitably caused the Revolution to occur, and Britain to lose one of their most profitable settlements. The question is not if the colonists had a lack of liberties, but the fact that the government, over 3000 miles away, were controlling some of the most important freedoms they came to cherish. When the colonies emerged at first, the colonists obeyed the control of Great Britain as they had the mentality that they would need the support of a strong empire to make their settlements develop (Doc I). Yet as the colonies realized that they could support themselves and still prosper, there was a detachment towards the motherland. In other words,
The british were very unfair and very unattractive to the american colonies mostly because of power and money the american colonies just wanted independence and self ruling for their own colony that's why we had the american revolution. In the 1760s, shortly after the conclusion of the french and indian war, the british parliament passed a series of laws and taxes on the american colonies.They created unfair laws and taxes on the british.The colonist disagreed with great britain on the fairness of these laws and taxes which led to conflict between the two sides.Eventually, this erupted into the American Revolution.(doc 1) The american colonies wanted to make there own decisions and have their independence.But the british wanted to rule and make laws and taxes for the american colonies also to punish the americans for their wrong doings.The american colonies do organized protest in spite of these laws and actions.Patrick henry responds to the stamp act patrick says in one of his speeches king George is a tyrant he breaks rules he is a threat to his own people.When Patrick Henry puts that in his speech it really lets you know that what they were doing was wrong and for king George to be leading it makes it even worst because he knows what he is doing and did not really care alongs as the british colonies were getting money for the debt they were in after the French and Indian war.