preview

Identification Of The Case : U.s. Department Of Housing And Urban Development Essay

Better Essays

Identification of the Case: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Rucker 122 S. Ct. 1230 (2002) Facts: The Oakland Housing Authority (OHA) instituted eviction proceedings in state court against William lee, Barbara Hill, and Pearlie Rucker alleging that they violated their lease agreement with OHA. The OHA allege that the grandsons of Lee and Hill were caught smoking marijuana in the apartment complex parking lot, Rucker’s daughter had cocaine and crack cocaine pipe within in her possession near Rucker’s apartment, and on three separate instances within a two-month period, seventy-five-year-old Herman Walker’s caregiver and two other individuals were found with cocaine in Walkers apartment. Lee, Hill and Rucker claimed ignorance to their family’s illegal drug abuse. Walker fired his caregiver upon receiving eviction notice. The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 provides that each public housing agency shall utilize leases that state any criminal activity that threatens the health, safety, or right of peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other tenants or any drug related criminal activity on or off the premises involving any member of the household, a guest or another person under the tenants control; whether the tenant is aware or unaware of their actions shall have their lease agreement terminated and evicted from the premises. OHA contends that the terms of the lease agreement that each tenant signed fully explains its drug use policy (HUD v. Rucker et al,

Get Access