With new advances in science, technology, transportation and communication from the industrial revolution, Western nations were determined to expand their empire overseas. There are varying motives that could inspire these western nations to dominate another land politically, economically or culturally. The common motivation of them all was to get an economic advantage in foreign lands. Under the pressure to support their new industrialized cities, manufacturers had desires for raw, natural resources and needed a global market to sell to more consumers. By using the need for more economic power, European nations justify their exploitation of resources, modernization of foreign regions to help their own crown, and the conquest to opening up …show more content…
During the time of an economic depression,expansion seemed necessary. The Franco-Prussian war left France with a great indemnity to pay to Germany and France was in need of economic power in this state. By getting resource abundance and trading ports elsewhere, this could revive their economy. Jules Ferry, Prime minister of France, states “...justify the policy of colonial expansion...as seen from the perspective of a need, felt more and more urgently by the industrialized population of France.” France was motivated to improve their economic well being by expanding into Indochina, where workers were not set to work towards French profit on high production plantations for low wages as opposed to their own. Jules Ferry justifies their mass land domination for ports and heavy taxation upon the people by stating “...The need to have places of supply, shelters, ports for defense and provisioning… And that is why we needed Saigon and Indochina.” French needed these lands to save their failing …show more content…
For example, The British Raj and its influence in India could appear as a humanitarian motive to help modernize a foreign nation. The British Raj acted as a catalyst in Indian development of agriculture, communication and transportation. Joseph Camberlain, British Secretary of State, even goes so far to state, ”...In almost every Instance in which the rule of the queen has been established and the great Pax Britannica has been enforced, there has come with a greater security to life and property and a material improvement in the condition of the bulk of the population” Although Joseph is correct that the new advancements in India did improve life, with easier communication and transportation, the new advancements in agriculture did not. All three helped benefit the both the British crown, through easier shipping of products with the new steam engine and easy communication to far lands with the telegraph, and India, by conquering distance with fast travel and communication. However agriculture advancements are what disrupts the economic-humanitarian balance. British farming replaced food crops with cash crops like cotton and jute. They were traded for fast money and cause widespread famine within India only in return for money. We can also see this exploitation in the 2nd photo. We see a well dressed man milking India of its money and not replacing anything in return for it. This also shows us the unrealistic
The third source showed that England had invaded many other countries in the world. They wanted resources to expand their economy. The early foundation of global trading networks such as interchange of good among people replaced by systems of government sponsored international business ventures designed to make European monarch rich. Only the Europeans benefited from this Eurocentric policy, indigenous people were exploited. Raw materials from these invaded countries were shipped from North and South America, Africa, and Asia to Europe so the European can expand their manufacturing industries. Places of the production got shifts from homes to large factories. The increased manufacturing leads to industrialization. The production techniques
This decade portrays the exploration of the Europeans to the American colonies which allowed England, France, Holland, Spain, and British to colonize with other lands and obtain power by expanding their territory. Nevertheless, England rose as the country with the dominant colonial power. Throughout this decade, the demand for silver and other valued items influenced trade globally by commercializing and strengthening European trade. In addition, the desire for power and control enriched the economy of the Europeans. The rise of European colonization also shaped cultural globalization since traders established various ethnic societies in foreign regions. European explorers were to stop at nothing in order to achieve success in expanding their
As an imperialist, Jules Ferry felt that France should be exploring and taking over new nations. He claimed colonial expansion was a great need that had become extremely urgent by the people and industrialized population of Europe (Kleinman, 1897). He stated that other countries, United States and Germany, were exporting so much more than France was. Jules Ferry compiled a report of statistics with his perspective of that great need for colonial expansion (Kleinman, 1897). This report
Throughout the industrial revolution many factories and industries were created. Raw materials became very great in number so countries started looking for new resources. Because of this and more reasons there was a new beginning to imperialism. Though the countries of Western Europe military technology began to conquer lands throughout the contingent of Africa and Asia. As seen in document 1 exploiting markets and
Due to this, countires in Europe wanted to get out and gain territory, to prove that they were stronger politically too. The three main factors for imperialism during this time, were economic, military, and political motives. Countries in Europe were interested in the supplies and economic opportunities in Africa. Thanks to advances in technology and the industrial revolution,it was key for European countries to gain and with the resources needed. For instance, cotton and rubber were needed the textiles which were a popular in Europe (Document C).
Prior to the 19th century imperialism of both Africa and Asia, revolutions and changes of territories led the Europeans to colonize these continents. The industrial revolution was a major impact to new imperialism. This revolution raised Europe’s economy and forced them to find new opportunities to sell the goods they have produced. Also, the change and loss of territories around the world meant a decline of power for Europe, and yet another reason to imperialize. The 19th century imperialism of Africa and Asia was caused by the industrial revolution because of goods, resources, and new markets in their countries. The industrial revolution also influenced imperialism based on the military and technological advances, such as the invention of
Like in document 3 Raymond Aron says "One of the colonial undertakings was motivated by the quest for capitalist profits", which explains another cause for imperialism. Also in document 4 Cecil Rhodes says "..the more of the world we inhabit, the better it is for the human race", he's explaining the idea of spreading power. This idea is still applied to
Between 1870 and 1920, the European nations took the use of imperialism due to economic, political, and social forces to control the less-developed locations of the world. Economical forces used the need for raw materials for a reason to take locations. Social forces such as racism, thinking that themselves, the Europeans were better than whomever they were taking over. Political forces used militarism more often than not to take the less-developed locations of the world. The use of economical, political, and social forces were all important during the rise of imperialism during the 1870s through 1920s due to the humanitarianism (used in both political and social forces), racism, and the market through world trade with the need for militarism.
Industrialization added to Britain’s desire for raw materials and new markets and the British were motivated by this desire and looked for colonies to obtain. Adopting the policy of imperialism was economically beneficial for Britain, since it helped supply Britain with raw materials for industrial development, along with cheap food for Britain’s developing population. Britain chose to become imperialistic, because it would bring them prudent and economic benefits.
From the start, there were many beneficial reasons for a European nation to imperialize, and by far, one of the most appealing reasons to imperialize other nations was access to raw materials. By the late 1800s, many European nations were seeing rapid growth in industry and manufacturing, but did not have the resources within their continental borders
Europeans sought out lands that provided new sources of raw materials, cheap labor, markets, areas of investment, and military boosters. As European nations became competitive with one another, there was an increased pressure to practice Imperialism to maintain power. New Imperialism was motivated greatly by the Industrial Revolution and its advancements, and efficiency of manufacturing and supplying products. European nations also focused on opening trade routes that would give them places to sell their goods. Also significant was the Europeans desire to Christianize and “civilize” other nations through missionary work and the enforcement of European cultures and beliefs. The new Imperialism brought on social changes as well. Many people urged the taking up of the “White Man’s Burden”, bringing the European version of civilization to the rest of the world, regardless whether they wanted it or not.
The industrial revolution was not only a time of great advancement for the west but was equally troubling for the European countries, especially that of France. Jules Ferry, a French statesmen recognized a need for expansion and took it upon himself to go in front of French parliament to argue his position of the need for French colonial expansion. The arguments he made in support of his country were of economical, humanitarian, and patriotic views.
Profit gains acted as the main factor triggering French colonization of Indochina to be in their presence. The French companies and the colonial officials engaged in the transformation of the Vietnam subsistence economy to a system that is proto-capitalist on the bases of low wages and exports, increased production, and land ownership (Kolko 7). Thus, the Vietnamese never worked for their profits, but for the benefit of the colonies of the French.
This led to a focus on a trading system because Europeans didn’t want to take on territorial responsibilities. During the Old imperialism era, Europeans set up trading posts, ports, and docks. These trading centers benefited the places the mother country was supplying too. They had objectives to protect their trading centers in native places and none to obtain territories in them. Europe’s trade within and between native lands led to cultural diversity which may have caused a small breach in unity. However, the old Imperialism era ended due to high costs in taking over territories and too much time to supply the mother country. There was no time to build up a superior, organized, skilled army for anyone. Also, due to the Industrial Revolution there was now a faster more efficient way to create and manufacture products. Throughout Western Europe, political authority was completely controlled by central governments, while leaders, such as Isabela I, were busy with the concept of how to increase the power of the state. National wealth was widely viewed as the groundwork of national power, governmental controls soon dominated nearly all of the state's domestic economy.
For example it provided political unity to India which had been torn by dissensions and strife before the arrival of the western powers.France had attempted to unify Indochina through growth and a government . This was made possible due to the creation of railroads, as well as other means of transport and communication, and press. The introduction of the French language which was a means of unifying the colonies and the French Imperialists through communication among the country because it was extremely mixed in language because of the many regions that France had united and as well as a system of administration throughout the country. This unity helped path the way for the growth politics amongst people and ultimately motivated them to overthrow the colonial and imperialist ruler of france. The French colonialism and imperialism was responsible for the introduction of western ideas like nationalism, democracy, constitutionalism and other things that they taught/showed the natives in Asia and Africa. The French tried to implant their ideas and institutions in their colonies and thus unconsciously let loose liberal forces in the countries of Asia and Africa for example Vietnam and