The Brexit
On June 23, 2016, a major decision was announced to the world that would send ripples of ambiguity with regards to the future of Britain and how their role globally would affect financial markets: The Brexit. The Brexit is perhaps one of the most monumental, nationalistic and financially influential choices the world has seen within the past decade. As Britain moves closer to individualizing itself from other European countries, the future of financial institutions and markets comes into question as it becomes filled with uncertainty and potential volatility. A look at the importance of Britain in the European Union (EU), the reasons why Britain made the profound choice to exit, and the influences the Brexit will have overall, can give insight as to what expectations financial institutions can possibly have in the upcoming future. Though financial institutions will adjust accordingly to the upcoming and current instability, it’s ultimately the market that will figure itself out and gravitate upcoming volatility towards the mean.
The Importance of Britain to the EU
Britain integrates itself with its European counterparts through the EU. Though roughly 28 countries have compromised the EU, Britain, Germany, and France are some of the most influential countries within the Union. These incredible countries, or powers, have some of the highest gross domestic productions (GDPs) in comparison to other countries within the EU. Britain’s GDP ranks third at over $2.8
Even a cursory study of the financial markets reveals that experts are worrying about multiple game-changing issues like Brexit, helicopter money, national debts and weak
The decision of the United Kingdom to leave the European Union has served in reshaping the way politics works in Europe. On June 3rd, 2016 a massive 30 million people came out to vote on the future of their countries. In the end, the vote to leave won 51.9% to 48.1%. Places like England and Wales both voted in favor of the exit, while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted overwhelmingly to stay in. While the long term effects of this decision obviously need time to be observed, the immediate economic impact has been somewhat mixed. The day after the vote was a cause for concern in that “the pound slumped after the referendum - and remains around 10% lower against the dollar and 15% down against the euro” (Wheeler 17). In contrast to this,
One major event that took place in the latter part of 2014 was the vote on whether Scotland was to continue being a part of the UK – the Scottish Referendum. The vote took place on the 18th September 2014, with 84.6% of the Scottish population voting. The question that was asked to voters was ‘Should Scotland be an independent country?’ The result of the vote was 55.5% voting ‘No’ and 44.5% voting ‘Yes’ (The Scottish Government, 2014). The result of this vote had potentially harmful repercussions for many country’s monetary and financial systems, including the UK. This report will critically evaluate the impact that the Scottish Referendum has and may have for the UK.
Great Britain has a regulated market economy compared to any other country in the world. Britain is industrialized. Britain produces textile and chemical products. Britain exports finished goods to other countries such as, fuels, chemicals, gas turbines, food, beverages, and tobacco. Britain, also imports machinery and computers. In addition, Great Britain sells and buys finished goods, such as food, fuels, petroleum, cars, and medicine. The United Kingdom’s (UK) service sector controls the economy, adding about 78% of GDP. The financial industry in London is the largest in the world. Britain’s aerospace industry is the second or third-largest national aerospace industry, depending on the method of measurement. Britain’sOffice for National
Over the last few years, the probability that Britain may leave the EU has grown. Prime Minister of the United Kingdom David Cameron announced a referendum concerning British membership in the EU to be held on June 23. Essentially not all the changes, which may occur, can be reduced to the question of money, since the problem has a strong political context. Still, this essay is mainly focused on economic aspects of the possible exit. Many experts regard the EU membership as generally beneficial for the UK; still there are some significant drawbacks. At the same time, there are factors that limit any possible prediction of the economic consequences of the British exit from the European Union. Nonetheless, in this work main areas affected by
There is no doubt that the ‘brexit’ will have a significant impact on UK, especially for the financial system. In the following few days after referendum, the financial market shows the immediate impact of ‘brexit’, the sterling exchange rate index sharply fallen by 9%, the bank equity price had fallen by 20%, the ten-year UK government bond yield had fallen by 52 basis point. In its latest financial stability report, the Bank of England had identified that the risks around the referendum on the United Kingdom’s membership of the European Union as the most significant near-term domestic risks to financial stability. (‘Financial Stability Report’ Bank of England, 30 July 2016). The following risks around referendum are considered main threaten to UK’s financial stability:
Following on from this the EU has a large variety of benefits towards it member
Brexit is not a just a political debacle, but also a great financial issue. The author points out that it is considered to be a bigger concern than Scotland’s independence. Bankers and other financial sectors feel that Brexit can cause a huge deal of loss, because Britain is said to be the gateway for the rest of the 28 nation European Union, a market which holds about 500 million more than what is prevalent in the United States and Japan combined. Anderson feels that for most big businesses like Goldman Sachs or Citigroup, London is the financial capital, which provides a gateway for nearly all of Europe. Without the unregulated access, the free flow of capital, resources, talent and goods and services would have to be renegotiated, making it difficult for the European nations. The financial industry is said to be the most affected since it accounts for about 7 percent of Britain’s gross
Early this year the United Kingdom held a referendum to decide whether to leave or stay apart of the European Union. This event is called the “Brexit” (Britain exiting the European Union), but even though the acronym only includes Britain it means the entirety of the United Kingdom. In the referendum, most of England and Whales voted to leave while Northern Ireland and Scotland voted to stay. Ultimately the United Kingdom’s vote was won in favor of leaving the EU with a 51.9% vote to stay and a 48.1% vote to leave (BBC News). Now the question is what does this mean for the UK and how will this impact its economy in the future? It may be too early to tell how this will play out, but for us to identify what is happening now we must thoroughly and truly understand the reasons for this Brexit in the first place.
Due to Brexit London Stock Exchange crashed and it saw trillions of pounds wiped off from UK’s share market. The share market became volatile. The investors of UK’s share market decided to move their funds to other European share market in Germany and Ireland and France. As a result pound lost its exchange value for the first time in last 15
On June 23rd 2016 the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union. This referendum is one of the most significant votes of a generation and will have substantial political and economic consequences for the UK and the wider world. Since the result of the vote, very little information regarding the terms of Brexit has been disclosed by the UK government. This has caused considerable economic instability, resulting in fluctuating currency markets and significant drops in consumer and investor confidence. Despite the general consensus that Brexit will have a negative impact on the UK economy in the long term there may be some benefits for the financial sector, such as a decrease in the stringent financial regulation that
The United Kingdom, the gem of Europe, has offered more to the world than just a stable government model. It has proven to be successful economically and a professional when it comes to Foreign affairs. The United Kingdom is triple generator powerhouse consisting the best of the best from England, Wales, and Scotland. The United Kingdom is not only a revolutionary when it comes to the economy, but also in music, literature and sports.
Winston Churchill called for the concept of a “kind of United States of Europe”, and with an ever-closer European Union both with tenacious economic and political ties, his call is materialising by the day. Though favoured by Churchill, the high European migrant levels and the erosion of Britain’s sovereignty has led to the questioning of the so-called ‘European super-state’. Britain voting ‘out’ on the 23rd. June would result in ‘Brexit’ and subsequently an end to free trade with its European counterparts. This would release her from the shackles of tariffs and quotas that are present for non-EU trade, leading to potential trade deals with Eastern countries such as China. Further to ones discussion with Britain being EUs second largest
Countries band together to promote trade, defend human rights, protect the environment and repel threats. They sign treaties and join international groups, and each time they do, they give up a bit of independence. That happened in a big way with the creation of the European Union, a free-trade zone and global political force forged from the fractious states of Europe. The question always was, could this extraordinary experiment hold together? The people of the United Kingdom gave their answer in a June referendum, shocking the world by voting to leave the bloc they'd joined in 1973. The way many Britons saw it, the EU was expensive, out of touch and a source of uncontrolled immigration. They chose what's become known as Brexit. Seeing that
The European Union has grown from its humble beginnings of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) into a complex system of governance within Europe and it has become a key figure internationally. The issue is whether the European Union (EU) has in this time grown into a supranational form of governance with the establishment of treaties, or have the nation states stayed in control. I am going to argue that the EU’s supranational qualities are the allocation of shared common interests among the nation states that compose it. It has been shown by history that the power ultimately lies in the member state as evidenced by the need for unanimity in passing the treaties that mandate the EU and earlier conceptions of it have resulted in the