What is interesting about sport? Sport: small word, big concept. The purpose of this essay is to highlight what aspects of sport are interesting, further linking it to a specific discipline. There are many disciplines within sport that are interesting, however, from my point of view, sociology is the most interesting one as it gives a true picture to what sports is like within society, in addition it emphasises the significance of sport in society since the early nineteenth century (Bell, 2009). Today’s concept of sociology has changed drastically since the 1950s, as it is more diverse, in terms of theory and subject matter as it is based on more areas of today’s social life, due to the fact that there are much more fields that need …show more content…
This shows that gender inequalities appear due to the fact that women do not question their role in life because they have seen this ‘natural behaviour’ in their families, therefore they would think they have to act in the same way in order to please their husbands. Additionally, this relates to sports as in the mid-nineteenth century when organised sports were first introduced they were created by men for men (Coakley, 2017). These practical activities had developed rules and they created governing bodies that established the ideals of gender ideologies, as sport was viewed as a male territory because women seemed too weak and fragile for competitive and contact based activities, also described by Coakley, 2017. This is an interesting fact as we can see that women were marginalised in the sports world since the early centuries, this allows us to notice the fact that although nowadays women have more rights in sport they are still treated as lesser than men in any situation, and especially within this area. However, although many ideas have been changing overtime, the sports world is still male-dominated (an individual’s performance is associated with manhood, this explains why performance is sometimes described as performing like a man, or holding manly characteristics) , male-identified (men’s values within sports are recognised by the entire community which creates a manhood, hence the reason why
Men throughout history have been the dominant gender, from the times of hunting with stone weapons to the modern day metal and automated machines. Many negative connotations are thought of when comparing women to men like strength, but less so when comparing men to women. Is it the society’s view that women are weaker than men or is it a natural fact brought to light? In sports women experience many prejudices, but even so some sports are equal or even female dominant. However the sheer majority lie in the male dominated section leaving women feeling oppressed and as if they have unequal rights, and they mostly do. Some instances of women oppression or unequal rights in sport belong to the sponsorships they receive, the effect media plays on children and women and also the history of sport and of gender inequality itself. The physical make up of each gender also effects stereotyping and how people perceive each gender.
The abuse of power to exploit and dominate women within sporting bodies is not a new concept to society and may seem complex however, to gain insight on this topic one may observe the role of masculinity in sports. Sport has been a masculine domain where men are able to assert their dominance, strength, and bravery. Directly addressed by the three I’s: inferiority, injury, and immorality in Authors Eileen McDonagh’s and Laura Pappano’s article Playing With the Boys: Why Separate Is Not Equal In Sports women have been marked as physically inferior to men (McDonagh and Pappano, 2008, pp.181-187). Additionally, society feared that if women were allowed to compete in masculine sports it would promote damage to their vital organs, homosexual affiliations,
Sport contributes to gender, race and class inequalities and not very much work has been done to resolve the problem (Messner 1989). Talbot (2002:282) identify the neglect of scholarly articles to address the issue of sexual and structural prejudices, as well as discrimination (in the form of media biases, homophobia, legal challenge of exclusion in sports and sports organisations), as a factor which limit the opportunities for sportswomen (Pirinen 2002:101) resulting in women’s lower participation levels (Pedersen 1996:191).
In today's society the male figure dominate in most aspects, especially in sports. They receive a great amount of media attention, far greater than female athletes. Young kids grow up watching male sports being dominant which causes stereotypes around female and sports. While boys have something to look up to, young girls do not receive the same image.Feminist movements made enormous improvement on the status of female athletes since the early twentyth century. Before the feminists movements, female athletes had to manouver in poorer circumstances, different rules, and with stricter dress codes. Society has regularly segregated and disregarded female competitors, expressing that they were manly and gay person. Likewise, hindering ladies from taking an interest in games. After this issues were highlighted, society has attempted to invert these separations and improved open doors for female competitors to champion.
This essay is going to critically evaluate whether ‘sports initiatives are a great way to empower females’. Gender is ‘the assignment of masculine and feminine characteristics to bodies in cultural contexts. It is a socially constructed category that involves roles, expectations, and responsibilities that are not biologically determined’ (Grewal & Kaplan, 2006). This definition shows us that it is not just physical things that define what gender is but also what roles there are. It is important as one of the big issues in sport in gender inequality, when males and females are not treated as equals in sport as well as in everyday life. For example in sports such as golf the males and females play the U.S. Open on different weeks and the
In the first reading: Sports, Males and masculinities, Pringle (2007) analyses how the relationship is developed between sport, masculinities and gender relations. First, historically, modern sport developed in the 1800s in male only English public schools. In Western
Socialization is a life long process whereby the individual learns the appropriate roles and norms of behaviour within a particular society. From birth, children are socialised into sex-linked roles; in many instances males are expected to behave in a ‘masculine’ way and are encouraged to be involved in activities, such as sport, that are traditionally regarded as male. Women however are usually expected to behave in a ‘feminine’ manner; a vast contrast to the encouragement of males to be strong, powerful, forceful and aggressive. This is reflected in women’s participation in sport, and more importantly, their coverage in the print media, which is minimal in comparison to their male counterparts.
This study reveals much about the attitudes that persist in society today regarding sport and gender. Early on, sport was created to serve men, evolving as a celebration of maleness, valuing strength, power, and competition. It idealized, promoted, and rewarded successful, elite athletes, established “the dream” as a professional career in sports, and viewed mass participation in sport as a tool to weed out the weak (Hill, 1993). In contrast, women’s sports originated to “address the expressed need for healthful exercise” (Huckaby, 1994). Unlike the competitive warrior mode
The Participation in organized sports has become very popular in America over the past 30 years. Many parents are worried that putting their children on a team too early could close them off to sports as a whole. When is the appropriate age for competing in organized sports and what are the consequences of starting too early or even too late? This paper will discuss whether children and preadolescents should participate in competitive sports.
Several studies have been done in the field of childhood sports effect on adults. Many believe that participation in sports can teach morals. According to Reuben B. Frost’s speech, “values can be developed through sport, but such development is not automatic.” (Frost, Development of Human Values through Sports) There are many debates on who actually teaches morals to players better. Many people believe that coaches actually teach morals more than others. (JOPERD journal, 2001) According to Marcel Pomohaci, Sopa I. Sabin, and the Journal of Physical Education, student athletes get more moral value from coaches than their own parents, However according to Thomas Wandzilak, he believes that teachers have a better influence on the students than their coaches. (Wandzilak 176-185) Florence Darnis-Paraboschi said that verbal instructions are better for a more beneficial impact on student athletes. (Darnish-Paraboschi, 14) There are also some people like Francesca Danioni who believe that parents teach morals better than any sport team every would. The most popular sports parents put children in are baseball, soccer, tennis, football, and dance. (Mayo clinic, 2016) To judge and diagnose certain things psychologically damaged within these children football players we use a sports psychologist which is a proficiency that uses psychological knowledge and skills to address optimal performance and well-being of athletes, developmental and social aspects of sports participation, and
Sports play an important role in our life as it keeps us healthy and active. We can have a healthy mind only when we have a healthy body. Great achievements come our way when we maintain our physical and mental well-being. Sports in other terms can be described as a social link to many personalities in the sporting environment. It helps to bring people from different parts of the world together and acts as a platform for a relationship. Also, It has helped the researchers to have an understanding of the behaviors and reactions of different types of athletes. There are some of the athletes that compete to be able to beat their opponents in the field while others engage themselves to achieve specific goals. This is a clear indication that all participants in any sporting activity participate in meeting specified and different achievements best known to them.
I have been fortunate to participate in many sports during my childhood. I have tried soccer,iceskating,gymnastics,tumbling,softball and many other ones. Then one day, I tried golf out. After a few times trying it out, I started to enjoy the game. I enjoy the game because you are playing against yourself and not for a team, so you cannot blame someone else for their performance. It is the one and only sport that I have stuck with for many years. I started in middle school. I just fell in with it because my dad plays also. When I first started to learn, I wasn't the best at it. Then I started to get some lessons and started practicing and started to see results.
Why should kids participate in sports during childhood? Well, there are many crucial elements of sports that further children. For example, mental toughness, that can provide a great stepping stone for maturity. There are hundreds and hundreds of sports. With that beings said, somebody can find a sport no matter their interest. Additionally, the foundations that are built playing sports can provide a very successful kid in the classroom. To further explain, students at all ages generally do better academically not because of the strength of the courses, but the brain power the student must use in the course. In result, when children play sports the child develops a stronger brain power to apply to courses.
According to statisticbrain.com there are over 36,000,000 kids aged 5-18 who participate in organized sports in the U.S. and statistically less than 3% of them will end up making a career out of their sport. If the likeliness of a child making a career out of their sport is so low why must we treat young athletes like they win even when they lose? Although some may argue that awarding kids with trophies helps keep them motivated to keep practicing I argue that the participant needs to be able to motivate him or herself rather than having something physical as motivation. Aside from teaching kids to be motivated by trophies, giving them underserved awards undermines the kids’ success and does not help prepare them for real life where the competition is real and awards and earned not received. Having competed in soccer, basketball, football and wrestling growing up I understand the conflicted feeling when everyone on the team whether they played or not got the exact same meaningless trophy as me. After having these trophies for a few years and reading “participation trophy” reiteratively allowed me to realize how much time I wasted in sports I wasn't good at because of these “motivators”. Participation trophies remove the concept of failure, teaches unrealistic life lessons and undermines the receiver’s success allowing them to feel short term happiness until understanding what they received.
First – The Aggies running game will allow them to control and dictate the pace of this game. Currently, Texas A&M ranks 2nd in the SEC in rushing offense, and Arkansas checks in 6th. They are averaging nearly 38 points per game, and have done some real damage on the ground, rushing for 756 yards in their three contests.