Industries are in a changing cycle and every day is a mission to survive in the business world. Historically, the innovation at Microsoft was driven by one person (Bill Gates) without any consideration of the other employee 's ideas. The whole company relied on one person to generate ideas to develop products and services. Then the Innovation Team at Microsoft realized the current situation of the competitors ' evolution and the need for the grassroots innovation implementation as a new horizon to gain ideas within the firm. Of course, Microsoft wants to preserve its position as a pioneer in the technology market, that’s why it shows more attempts to keep pace with changes. Definitely, Microsoft has found a replacement for …show more content…
The employee 's fear if their idea has been ranked as invalid, and inferior idea and the pressure that the people with ideal ideas will survive. Very high level of competition among employees has a negative impact on productivity and performance. As a result, stressful and confused employees who are not able to be creative and generous to share their ideas. The Microsoft’s culture that was structured on the concept of employees have to work hard to go up and make a progress or go out from the company doesn’t show any loyalty and consideration to the employee’s contributions. Microsoft 's environment is full of pressure, fears, stress, strict rules and brutal competitions which may lead to turn over and push the employees to find a healthier environment; especially with the trend in the competitors as Google which emphasizing on the employee 's happiness to receive better performance and provide a healthier environment for creativity and innovations. With the new mindsets such as “Employee Coms First’’, “Happy Workplace’’, and ‘’Healthy Environment’’ Microsoft has faced a challenge with its culture.
• Closed-door policy:
Another concept of Microsoft culture is closed-door policy. In another word, Microsoft relies on small offices with a closed-door to provide more concentration and quietness for the employees to work in a peaceful environment. This is could be a barrier
Microsoft has their dominance of the industry at stake. They could potentially come out on top if left to continue their current tactics. They are masterfully “marketing their products” and it is paying off for them (Love, 1997).
They have expand their business from only on computer software and hardware to online search engine, home gaming devices and smartphone, those business are the popular business in the world, Microsoft is trying to adapt the new market.
The environment of an individual including culture of the company, management style, level of stress at work, etc…are also very important factors.
One of the most successful companies in this century is Microsoft. This company has been known to be treating their employees as their major assets as one of their ways to remain successful in the future. They conduct leadership and management development training for their employees to keep them globally competitive in their jobs and as influential people (Microsoft,
Microsoft was founded in 1975, and is the worldwide leader in software, services, and solutions (Career). Microsoft is proud to offer great products and employ outstanding people. Previous Microsoft CEO, Steve Ballmer once said, “There are many things that are true about Microsoft. We have big goals, big dreams, and big aspirations for the future. We are both competitive with our products and in the way we attract and retain talent. For me, the most important factor is competition for talent, because I know our success comes from the people who work here” (Foley).
Due to this culture, the work unit climate is affected as well. It can be seen that there is a weak cross-functional collaboration among the departments since Jack’s leadership. This is demonstrated by Jack, who goes directly to R&D department for new projects without considering any discussion with other departments. Therefore, other departments do not functioning at their optimal level hence, it affects the organization effectiveness. Besides that, it is clear that Innostat employees only working within their own departments, and prefer to work on their achievements, hence prove that there is no common goal among them. Apart from that, Jack’s opinion on “Good ideas don’t need incentives, they need passion” (Beer, 2006) is one of the factors that affect the individual and organizational performance. Jack as a leader does not put much attention on the rewards, hence it
As previously stated Microsoft’s success regarding career development, and the implementation of human resource strategies rests upon three factors: the ability to recruit and retain quality talent; the ability to ensure that the aforementioned talent receives the tools required to achieve; and the fostering of continual innovation and reinvention.
Microsoft's stated mission statement is "to help people and businesses throughout the world realize their full potential." Arguably, a statement this vague provides so little sense of mission that it lacks value. That is the point. Microsoft cannot even uphold its own mission internally, given the gap between the company's potential and the company's output. That the company has no coherent, tangible sense of its own mission is a contributing factor to that failure. Consider the company's resources. As Clarke (2010) notes, it is not for lack of ideas that Microsoft has failed to innovate. The company has great people, highly-talented, educated and experienced. It has $66 billion in cash on its balance sheet and another $10 billion in long-term investments (MSN Moneycentral, 2012). Clarke (2010) notes that the company spends $9 billion per year on research and development. The potential for innovation at Microsoft, then, is tremendous, yet its output is minimal.
Just over a few decades with Steve Ballmer, Microsoft has a new corporate leader at the helm. As Satya Nadella takes over the position that Mr. Ballmer once endured, his spirit took off with great confidence concerning his new role at the company (Microsoft, 2014). The next decade is likely to reveal the level of success his abilities bring to the future of the company and his own status as leader.
This essay will utilise the following structure. It will commence by providing the reader with a brief history about Microsoft and then go onto explaining what corporate strategy is. Following this will be Microsoft’s diversification strategy in parallel with the reasons why they choose to diversify. Within this section the author plans to explore Microsoft’s related diversification approach, their corporate rationale, alongside why skill transferring is essential to them sustaining a competitive advantage and also how they achieved
Microsoft Corporation is a public multinational corporation headquartered in Redmond, Washington, USA that develops, manufactures, licenses, and supports a wide range of products and services predominantly related to computing through its various product divisions. Established on April 4, 1975 to develop
Mr. Gates’ also explains how Microsoft tackled the challenge of integrating the Internet to be compatible with various Microsoft products. The biggest dilemmas were determining what should be incorporated into the existing Microsoft products, what should be packaged as new products, and how should the Windows Operating System support the Internet. He gives frequent examples of how the other competing computer industry giants were able to succeed in the computer industry. A lot of success he points out was made through trial and error as well as learning from one’s mistakes. He talks about how Microsoft has learned from projects that have failed such as the Multiplan spreadsheet that went on to be developed into Microsoft Excel, and the Omega database that would become Microsoft Access. One suggestion that Mr. Gates makes in achieving company success is by
Tidd and Bessant (2009) argued that “Unless an organization is able to move into further innovation, it risks being left behind as others take the lead in changing their offerings, their operational processes or the underlying models that drive their business”.
Microsoft Corporation is one of the largest and most influential companies in the personal computer industry. It has won several awards for innovation, for their commitment to diversity, and for their flexible work arrangements. It has always been a leader in the market with regard to its compensation. With 80,0004 employees across the world, having more than $15 billion revenue, it is one of the biggest and best‐known technology companies in the world.
in order to create possibly the most effective and versatile workforce of any corporation in existence. To study Microsoft's way of doing business is to look at the company from many angles, from a managerial and organizational standpoint to its process of developing products and services for its customers and its competitive environment. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Microsoft from a strategic fit