Integrity coupled with loyalty is the focal point of my existence, the twin guiding forces which shape my actions and behaviour both in my personal life and work setting. Integrity, in particular, is the sieve which filters my thoughts and helps me make critical decisions while framing my worldview. The meaning of integrity for me has evolved over the years; while during my academic peregrination integrity translated to being original and not cheating on a test, currently , as a working professional in a corporate setup it resonates more with holding on to my beliefs when faced with undue pressure and plagiarism, not claiming undue credit and acting without bias. It has especially assumed more importance in the last three and a half years since
Integrity is being faithful towards your work. Someone must own up to the workload that college has upon every student within its campus and complete
Stephen L. Carter links integrity and honesty. There are three constraints discussed in this essay. First, integrity does require a degree of moral reflectiveness. Second, Integrity may cause conflict that is must be resolved. It does not necessarily produce or protect interpersonal harmony. Third, a person who has integrity can be trusted. It does not avoid the restructuring of social structures and associations, because it leaves the matter to exercise of interpersonal authority.
Integrity plays a big role in my academic life. Integrity builds trust between teachers and students. Good student-teacher relationships are developed from trust
A person of integrity does exactly what he says and says exactly what he means. There is no conflict between his thoughts and actions. His actions are consistent with the values he professes. According to Dr. William Manninger, A building without integrity may receive structural damage, or even collapse, in a storm. Similarly, people without integrity are blown about by the winds of misfortune and destroyed by catastrophes, for they lack the firmness, solidity, and strength of character to weather any storm. This means that integrity is one of the six essential qualities that are the key to success.
When retired General Petraeus’ name is uttered, some recall his stellar 28 year career culminating in the stabilization of war-torn Iraq while everyone remembers his extramarital affair culminating in the release of classified information to his mistress. Similar to a Shakespearian play full of scandal that ends in tragedy, I will assert how General Petraeus is a visionary leader by stabilizing war-torn Iraq from 2007 to 2008 who became an unethical leader while serving as the director of the CIA by having an extramarital affair and releasing classified information to his mistress. To enhance my claim that he is a visionary leader, I will be focusing on his transformational leadership behavior of inspirational motivation and “Lewin’s Phases of Change” during the stabilization efforts. To enhance my claim that he is unethical, I will focus on two contributing factors to his affair and release of confidential material which are: the ethical trap of loyalty syndrome and the ineffective use of intellectual integrity. Finally, I will be detailing my personal relevance utilizing visionary leadership to revector my organization before a Nuclear Surety Inspection and how I became an unethical leader while serving as a team chief in my earlier years. In order to stabilize war-torn Iraq in 2007, a visionary leader was required to enact a revolutionary plan to ease the mind of the American public.
The idea of a person’s integrity is rather abstract but can in part be evaluated based upon an individual’s thoughts and actions. The aforementioned evaluation is subject to the personal opinions of the evaluators’ which can lead to differences in conclusions. This obviously lends itself to mixed reactions and undoubtedly complicates the definition. Fortunately, or perhaps unfortunately, society seems to have converged on a few consistent ideals to better “judge” one’s integrity.
Integrity is an essential character quality that defines an effective leader. Integrity is a unifying element; it means more than telling the truth. Integrity is concerned with right and wrong, and adherence to a set of values (Satterlee, 2013, p. 7). In that, integrity speaks on the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles – moral uprightness. A resilient leader should hold steady to their morals when faced with an ethical dilemma. “Leader integrity matters because it plays a significant role in the decision process used by followers when determining who they will follow, who they will trust, to whom they will be loyal and committed, and ultimately for whom they will perform” (Moorman & Grover, 2009, p.107). A leader’s integrity goes beyond their personal character make-up, subordinates will feel a sense of connection to a leader who acts with
C.S. Lewis defined integrity as doing the right thing when no one is looking. That has been one of my greatest lessons as a professional and as a small business owner.
From my point of view loyalty is owe to the employer. The employee shows the greater duty of loyalty because an employee should act for his employer’s benefit when engaging in any conduct that relates to the employment.
Without dedication, it is impossible to drive oneself to success. Personal and professional integrity help gain staff confidence and business loyalty, while a simple ability to empathize with virtually anyone, and understand their needs, will inspire people to follow you.
“Now I was the one under the microscope, the one who had to prove my worthiness” (Hosseini 184). This quote demonstrates the role switch that encourages Amir to change the disloyal person he was previously into the person he is at the novel's end. Hassan is constantlyys tormented by Amir's meaningless “tests” to prove Hassan's loyalty. Now, it is Amir who has to prove to the world, and also to himself that he is worthy of Hassan's endless sincerity and devotion. Khaled Hosseini does an excellent job of portraying this transformation in his writing. Hosseini's novel, The Kite Runner, illustrates the value of loyalty in the relationships between Hassan and Amir, Sanaubar and Sohrab, and Amir and Baba.
Employee views of integrity at work have changed little in two years. It should be of great concern that only about half of all American working adults (49 percent – statistically just a notch higher than 47 percent in 1999) believe their senior executives are people of high integrity. Only slightly more
Several studies have been done to understand the relationship of trust and loyalty. This section discusses the previous work that has been done to establish the relationship.
Loyalty can be defines as faithfulness or a devotion to a person, group, or a country. Along with loyalty, integrity can be defines as a concept of consistency of actions, values, methods and principles, shortly, being loyalty to the personal principles. From this point of view, integrity and loyalty have a connection. Most of the situation we face include not only integrity but also loyalty. For example, I was in the Turkish Naval High School, and it was a counselling course. The Superintendent gave an order to counselling instructors to explain sexual relationship for that week. Superintendent wanted students to learn what is right or wrong about sexual relationship from an expert, which is the counselling instructors, he did not want students to learn wrong things from their friends or anyone else. Superintendent’s intention wasn’t bad, however the instructor believed that students should learn about sexual relationship when they are about 18 years old, because the instructor did not want the students to start thinking about sexual relationship at lower ages. For this reason, we talked about the problems we faced in the high school to find solutions to them. While we were talking about the problems, the superintendent entered the class. He asked what we were talking and the instructor answered that we were talking about the problems with the school. We noticed that the superintendent got angry at the instructor, and told him to see him after class. We knew that something
Integrity has always been the most important quality to me throughout my life. I believe that if people are able to trust my judgment and trust my decisions, I will go a lot farther in every aspect of my life. For example, if my coworkers are able to trust my work actions I will be given more independence at work and more freedom to make decisions which will ultimately lead to a higher potential for promotion. Think about it, would you ever consider promoting a worker who you knew lied, cheated, or performed illegal acts such as fraud? I know I wouldn’t. This brings me to my next point; what would I do if I knew one of my clients was performing an illegal fraudulent act? Would I have the courage and be willing to risk my job in order to bring the truth to the foreground? Would I blow the whistle? I would like to think that I would answer a definite yes to that question but the truth is when one is in the position to either blow the whistle or not blow the whistle there are many outside forces that play into the decision. It is necessary to be reminded that in order to preserve integrity, blowing the whistle is a necessary act when deemed appropriate. In this essay I will explain what types of situations require the whistle to be blown and how to determine those situations, as well as any trends found through research between whistleblowers such as age, gender, loyalty to job, etc.