preview

Is Attrition A Negative Impact On Late Stage Doctoral Attrition?

Decent Essays

Literature Review Willis and Carmichael (2011) presented foundlings stating that attrition is defined by the experiences gathered in the doctoral study rather than the stage at which erosion occurs. The study share relevant similarities to previous research, indicating perverse experiences could lead to pessimistic outcomes regardless of the field or stage of the doctorate program (Willis and Carmichael, 2011). The theoretical foundations of this case study support the synthesis arguments of Hoskins and Goldberg (2005) that stated dissertation committee chair post a problematic negative impact on late-stage doctoral attrition. Other scholars argue the results of the current research. Incomplete doctoral learners all assert how a problematic relationship with their dissertation chair played a significant role in their decision to leave the program (Willis and Carmichael, 2011). However, Willis and Carmichael (2011) identified the gap and addressed problems in the attrition decision. Dropped-out learners were not allowed to achieve their goals, and that resulted in negative emotions (Willis and Carmichael (2011). According to Willis and Carmichael (2011), comparatively, students that willing quit the dissertation process no longer desire the degree, and thus experienced positive emotions related to attrition, but more research is needed. Phenomenon Key Component The event key element in this qualitative study describes dissertation committee chair as the problem in

Get Access