A 65-year-old Chinese woman, who is currently being treated for a suspected urinary tract infection (UTI), has enquired to whether cranberry juice is effective for preventing and treating UTIs. After querying the RN, they too are unsure how effective the therapeutic intervention is. Thus, there must be an investigation utilising evidence-based practice (EBP) to determine the effectiveness of the therapeutic intervention and provide accurate information to the patient. Furthermore, when delivering the information to the patient, culturally appropriate care must be considered, to ensure clear and coherent communication to the patient. EBP provides health professionals a method to use critically appraised and scientifically proven evidence …show more content…
The question was rephrased as a specific, answerable question using PICO, which refined the case study to its core components; postmenopausal women, cranberry juice and UTIs. The advanced search limits were enabled to craft rather precise research strategies, with Boolean operators and wildcards were utilised in the phrase search; postmenopausal wom*n AND cranberr$ juice AND UTIs (Wolf et al., 2013). The search limits of the Cochrane Library were restricted to Cochrane review and trials, and the publication dates from January 2010 to May 2014. From this refined search of the selected databases, eight papers returned from over 8000 results. Evaluating the eight papers for quality evidence was critical when selecting the two papers to utilise. The evidence hierarchy was considered, aiming to use the highest evidence possible, such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and randomized, controlled, double-blind studies, to ensure the most accurate evidence informed the clinical decision for the patient (Bloom, Olinzock, Radjenoic & Trice, 2013). When sorting the results, other various factors were also taken into consideration; credibility, reputability, reasonability and support. With these factors taken into account, the two papers selected are highly esteemed in regards to evidence, and are most relevant to the patient (Stichler, 2010). The first paper, selected from the CINAHL database, was the
Evidence based practice can be defined as the process of, using the recent evidence base practice to make decision about patients individual care and to make sure that patient is getting most appropriate care by utilising the best practice, judgement clinically, preference for individual patient and systematic review (Nay & Fetherstonhaugh, 2007). Hence, when health professional work, they need to consider the characteristics of the context of the practice and the patient’s values and their situation. So, combination of these elements helps to make an assessment in patients care as EBP is involved (Hoffmann, Bennett & Del Mar, 2013). Hypothetically, the proper practice of EBP can help to increase consistency in caring patient, supporting the experimental research, which can benefit clinicians to provide quality of care, assessing and justifying patient (Nay & Fetherstonhaugh, 2007). For e.g, the act of washing hand prevents from infection. It is consider being the main root of transmission of disease from one person to other. According to the systematic review by So (2011), organism is eradicated from immediate hand washing with liquid soap and water when changing the wound dressing of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). According to Hoffmann, Bennett & Del Mar, (2013), the rational of the clinical evaluation becomes more obvious when clinical information is integrated on best evidence practice, which is available with knowledge. It also helps to increase confidence in
Evidence based practice is when recent research is integrated into the clinical setting for maximum delivery of health care. A lot of evidence based practice was developed from research studies conducted by nurses such as decubitis ulcer prevention. Knowing and demonstrating the scientific methods and processes will help to advance nursing care by providing better interventions for patient care. Patient care plans should be developed based on evidence (Dycus, 2009). With monitoring outcomes from evidence based practice it can be determined if the care caused improvement in the healthcare setting. Using quality measures such as charts and diagrams to understand performance.
An annotated bibliography is a catalogue of citations to books, documents and articles with the purpose of the annotation being to inform the reader of the precision, relevance and quality of the sources cited (Davis, 2009). Evidence based practice enables health care professionals to effectively use current verification during the decision-making procedure (Sacket et al 2000). Healthcare professionals use a hierarchy of evidence as a guide to define the reliability and importance of the evidence based research; with the evidence that is founded further upon
In the first article, the author’s goal is too reduce urinary tract infections by implementing an evidence-based approach. By doing so it focuses on the importance of the nurses, physicians and staff working together as a team to reduce the urinary tract infections. The nurse driven protocol is what was tested, observing how the nursing staff communicated and how they followed evidence based practice approach. Also, focusing on an academic practice partnership to enhance patient outcomes (Johnson, Gilman, Linter, & Buckner, 2016).
Finally, one article was found by conducting a search of the identified article’s reference section. This article was searched by title on the Cochrane database and was found useful to the clinical
The purpose of this paper is to present an analysis of a quantitative article using Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt’s (2015) rapid critical appraisal (RCA) for a randomized clinical trial. Topics included are the validity of the research, results of the research and how the information can be applied to the clinical care of my own patient population.
While this structure provides a starting point for the critique of evidence strength, the prudent evaluation and, subsequent, translation into practice guidelines requires further consideration (Greenhalgh, 2010). Research can be scrutinized into measures of quality. John Hopkins Hospital grades evidence on a high to low scale, A through C, based on criteria including consistency of results, reproducibility of findings, sample size of study, level of study control, organizational design, and expert opinion (Newhouse, Dearholt, Poe, Pugh, & White, 2005). Using this evaluation tool, an A score would result in a recommendation for clinical practice while a score of C should alert the clinician to a low quality of research and should not be incorporated into practice guidelines (Newhouse et al., 2005).
Please list the references and clinical resources that you use in your review of this document. These references should support any clinical or extensive revisions or additions that you make. Aside from known common best practices, references are required. We reserve the right to request additional references. References and resources used:
The author considers the simplest way of finding out best practice is by using guidelines. According to Field & Lohr (1992) guidelines are “systematic developed statements to assist practitioners and patients decisions for specific clinical circumstances.” Evidence is always current and a generous collection of many different systematic research reviews with multiple random control trials are available (AGREE, 2000). These types of trials are graded at the top level of hierarchy (Guyatt et al 2002).Nevertheless in contrast Devereaux and Yusuf (2005) argue that top level hierarchy is not a guaranteed deviation from the truth in randomized trials. The clinical guidance used is the National Institute of Clinical Guidance (NICE 2009) is based in the author’s homeland and is an independent organisation responsible for providing guidelines. The ethos behind NICE (2009) is to promote and prevent poor health nationally involving the public, health professionals and patients in the process (NICE 2009).
Evidence based practice is the incorporation of individual clinical expertise with best research evidence and patient values and expectations. Health care decision of individual patients should be based on best available research evidence. A health decision made from a sound research evidence has the potential to ensure best practice and reduce variations in health care delivery. In health science, an ever increasing plethora of studies being published and is challenging for clinicians to keep up with the literature. Integrating research into practice is time consuming and need methods for easy access to such evidences for busy clinicians. Indeed, clinical decision should be based on the latest research evidence. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses summarize the research evidence, which is generally the best form of evidence, thereby making the available evidence more accessible to decision makers and are positioned
Summaries – Evidence is taken from practice guidelines that were established by healthcare organizations and entered into the National Guidelines Clearinghouse databases. Summaries can be appraised rapidly because they are given a
The study was a systematic review of scientific papers selected by a search of the SciELO, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and LILACS-BIREME databases. Among the 2169 articles found, 12 studies proved relevant to the issue and presented an evidence strength rating of B. No publications rated evidence strength A. Seven of the studies analyzed were prospective cohorts and 5 were cross-sectional studies.
You are absolutely right that the evidence has to match the reality, to be useful in clinical setting. Since health care professionals want to ensure an effective and compassionate care which meets their patients’ needs, the validity of the evidence is important, therefore a sound research evidence which tells us what does and does not work, and with whom and where it works best, is very important while incorporating the evidence from research, clinical expertise, and patient preferences into decisions about the health care of individual patients (Mulhall, 1998). Health care professionals can make use of Cochrane Reviews for the authoritative, relevant, and reliable evidence of researches (Cochrane, 2016)
Evidence based practice has a great impact on health care system, nursing practice, teaching, and science. The necessity for evidence based quality enhancement and healthcare alteration underscores the requirement for redesigning and implementing care that is effectual, secure and competent (Stevens, K., Ma., 2013). The movement of evidence based practice commenced with the identification of the problems faced in healthcare system. The unacceptable gap between what we know and what we do in the patients care(Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. 2001). The main intend of evidence based practice in health care is to provide the resources by which the most latest relevant evidence from research and studies can be judiciously
Both clinicians who are enquiring clinical questions and researchers who are conducting in-depth searches for systematic reviews come across a few