Is Google Making USupid Analysis Essay

Carr has a more negative opinion about new technology than Cascio. Carr believes the internet and previous technological advancements have caused many changes in society, including reducing people’s ability to focus. Carr says, “What the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation.” This is just one of the many times that he blames the internet for the changes that have occurred in the past decade.

This argument becomes more valid when he references some of his co-workers and reinforces his argument. One of the best examples of cause and effect is when Carr introduces the idea of the clock. Carr states,” the clock disassociated time from human events and helped create the belief in an independent world of mathematically measurable sequences” (612). This concept definitely supports the cause and effect by suggesting that the clock completely affected the way our minds run. Carr’s concerned tone also helps add to the article. His concerned tone shows when analyzing examples, and how he seems nervous about what he future holds, like when Carr says ,” The internet, an immeasurably powerful computing system, is submerging most of our other intellectual technologies” (613). He uses strong language to show that the internet really is a threat to us, and how we should be aware of how the internet is molding us. Carr also suggests that we should be skeptical of his skepticism, but he brings up interesting points of view. There are good and bad effects to the internet, and Carr did a great job of getting his point across to us. He used fact vs fiction, cause and effect and much more leaving us with a lot to think about. He stirs up many thoughts, like maybe we shouldn’t be concerned with Google making us stupid, but how technology is shaping

The author 's tone changes in paragraph 4 when Carr talks about how the Internet has altered his mind by crumbling away at how much he can concrete. When Carr states “For me, as for others, the Net is becoming a universal medium” in paragraph four the author provides his counter argument which is to warn the incoming generations the dangers of the Internet before his main argument. Which is that the Internet is making us stupid and is altering how we think, by doing this it allows Carr to spend the rest of the article refuting his main argument.

Is Google making us stupid? That is a fascinating question with a not so simple answer. Nicholas Carr does a fantastic job of expressing his skepticism about Google; However, he does not bring much in the way of facts, uses broad speculation and relies on a few thoughts of others to bring his skepticism to light. Carr is not very convincing in his manner of trying to reach the rest of the world with his message that Google is hurting us rather than helping us.

Carr starts at his paper in a first point of view. He expresses his feelings that the internet is changing his own personal thinking. This man is an author, he's born to read and even he says that he's having problems because he can no longer read anymore. Carr says that “the web has been a godsend” (Carr), but he also explained it's not only a

At the beginning of his essay, Carr describes his interactions between reading and the internet: “I’m not thinking the way I used to think... Now my concentration starts to drift after two or three pages... For more than a decade now, I’ve been spending a lot of time online” (150). In this passage, Carr depicts how the internet has changed him; he used to be able to concentrate for a long time, but with distractions from the internet he is unable to hold his focus while reading and can only concentrate for “two or three pages.” By including himself in the group of people who are afflicted by the pitfalls of the internet, Carr appears more honest and credible, which makes his argument believable.

In his essay, “Is Google Making us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr discusses societies dependence to easily accessible information. Since the inception of the internet and search engines, information has been accessible to us instantly. Although instant access to information is a desirable advancement in technology, it comes with questionable consequences. From his own personal experience, Carr explains that since this invention, his brain feels as if it has been tinkered with. Carr explains that his brain does not work the way it used to, that it’s very hard for him to become engrossed in books, articles, or essays. As he continued to try to become engrossed in these readings, he found that his thoughts would wander and he would become restless after just a few

In paragraph three, he expresses himself stating: “ And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation. My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it.” (2) While his statement correlates with multiple examples from his close friends and from research programs that he provided throughout his article, can we really hold the internet accountable for our lack of concentration and our reading deficiency? Carr, does not accept the simple fact, that people that can’t concentrate and cannot critically analyze what they are reading from the Net, are those that have lost their self discipline to differentiate what’s important and what is not. People definitively, should hold themselves accountable for their own defectiveness of reading, and most importantly discontinue bashing of the internet. In addition Carr, also disregards that the internet has giving us all the opportunity to expand our minds and to elevate our creativity which will lead us to continue to embrace innovation and endless opportunities for everyone in our

Although it is not as much present in the article, the slightest bit is seen when he depicts his own experience to the readers. He mentions that the net seems to be chipping away his capacity for concentration and contemplation. Then Carr uses reliable sources to support his claims such as Friedman, a pathologist at the University of Michigan, Marynne Wolf, a developmental psychologist at Tufts University, James Olds, a professor of neuroscience, and even the founders of Google. This makes the reader realize that Carr has read widely and thought deeply about this topic. Which also reflects to the dedication he has put in this

He first starts out his article by calling Carr’s article out about all of the statements that he believes are wrong. The first point he makes is that the internet is one of the best uses of technology. Prior to the use of the internet, anyone who wanted to learn something new would have to sit in a library for many hours, but now you can learn the same thing on a smartphone in a fraction of the time. The uses of all different types of technology is also helping humans become better multitaskers. Both Greg and Carr believe that humans are not good at multitasking, but Greg thinks people are still not that bad at it. He thinks that using many forms of technology is helping younger kids learn and become better at multitasking than older people. Lastly he talks about how people are scared to start to embracing technology because it will take people away from having a face to face conversation with someone else, but the printing press got the same comments about it when it first came out too. So he thinks that technology is changing and people need to be onboard with it and they cannot stop

Technology, especially the Internet, makes humans’ life easier and more effective. A quick access to information brings people a huge opportunity to explore the world and develop them. However, Nicolas Carr, in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” argues that technology affects people’s life, it changes their mind and actions, and humans start to lose abilities of “deep thinking and deep reading”, which are essential skills of being humans. In other words, our world becomes more simplified that people are unable to be smart and creative as they were in the past. For him, today’s people think and act in the frame of programmed world of the Net. Moreover, although Carr worries that the Net based corporations, such as Google, are seeking to replace human’s

Google, is becoming the face of research in today’s era. After reading an article called “Experts Say Google Does Not Make Us Stupid” by David Weir, he backs up the point that Google does not make us stupid, but instead it’s making us smarter. Weir, actually did a survey that conducted of 895 experts. According to Weir, “76 percent agreed that by 2020, people’s use of the internet (Google) has enhanced human intelligence; as people are allowed unprecedented access to more information they

Carr discusses the effects that the Internet has on our minds and the way we think, as well as the way media has changed. Our minds no longer focus. When in conversation with people we are constantly distracted by the technological advances our era has brought. Text messages, emails, pop culture drama has all taken

The parts of Google and Memory had arrested my attention. In some points, I agree with Carr that Google is the business of distraction, it takes our concentration as well as the research. But we cannot deny that Google is the best search tool on the Internet where you can get every information within less than 2 seconds. Also, the fact that Google is the business, they give us more, they get even more. Besides, chapter 8 points out the important of efficiency and Google completely conquered it. For chapter 9, Carr states that Internet is the cause of the dismantling of personal

Carr’s entire argument is how the internet is making the population weak minded, which is easily clearly arguable with the resources available to us now. Some examples of resources are online school, library databases, educational games, daily newspapers, and even books are now sold online and school is being provided online to be more accessible to us. The hyperlinks that Carr mentions in his article as we “power browse” (1), in fact the internet/google is more helpful in going further into a subject being studied. For instance if someone is trying to research a sickness, the search starts with google, entering the sickness which leads them to an article, possibly Wikipedia, then a hyperlink is introduced to a subject they aren’t educated on, one would read further to gain more helpful