preview

Is Sethe Justified In Sweet Home

Decent Essays

Generally speaking, readers are encouraged to respond to Sethe’s actions like most other characters in the novel and deem her actions as disgusting and unforgivable. This is due to the fact that most characters, such as Stamp Paid and Paul D, feel that, “more important than what Sethe had done was what she claimed” (Morrison 193). This refers to the fact that Sethe justified her actions and did not necessarily feel that she had done anything wrong—in fact, she felt that her plan had worked out, as seen during her conversation with Paul D. However, the fact that she was seemingly oblivious to the inhumane actions she committed encourages readers to judge Sethe harshly in response to her actions. But, despite the overwhelming pressure to feel …show more content…

If Sethe had attempted to kill her children without the arrival of the schoolteacher, sheriff, and slavecatcher, then her actions would most certainly not be justifiable under any circumstance. However, because her children were in immediate danger of being dragged back to the cruel world of slavery, Sethe’s decision is understandable despite not necessarily being the “right” thing to do. As argued by Paul D, “There could have been a way. Some other way” (Morrison 194), which shows that her actions were not the best choice but can be justified based on the fact that she was essentially cornered. However, even if her actions were the “right” thing to do, it does not necessarily mean that Sethe had the right to make that choice for her children. This is due to the fact that no one single person on Earth should play “God”, and all human beings should have the right to make their own choices concerning their …show more content…

As a result of this, the people she needs forgiveness from aren’t her neighbors or the general public, but are rather Howard, Bulgar, and most importantly, Beloved herself. Despite sinning against society and everything motherhood should stand for, the most atrocious sin she committed was against her own children, which is why their forgiveness is the only one that truly matters. Furthermore, while certainly not being noble or courageous, Sethe’s actions are indeed maternalistic—she chose to kill her children because it was the only way she felt she could protect them from the schoolteacher. In her argument with Paul D, Sethe contends that, as a mother, “It’s my job to know what is and to keep them away from what I know is terrible” (Morrison 194), and she did just that. Sethe knew exactly what was in store for her children if they were to fall into the clutches of the schoolteacher, so, as their mother, she protected them from it because it was her duty as their mother to do so. However, in addition to being maternalistic, it can also be argued that Sethe’s actions were instinctual and were not as planned out as they should have been, therefore coming across as rather animalistic and barbaric. As

Get Access