Jack Odell On Relativity

“We have a moral responsibility to disobey any law that conflicts with the law of god.” (Paragraph 16)

Dylan is a tall and lean young man, not even out of high school, life on the streets is hard. He was kicked out by his mother when she found a new man,16-year-old Dylan Wallace has been panhandling on the streets, preparing for winter. Dylan panhandles barely enough money to eat. As the weather gets colder and the going gets harder Dylan wants to know what he did to deserve this life. He doesn’t want to deal drugs or turn tricks like his friends, he does not want to be one of ‘’vulture’’ slaves. Dylan can’t get a job because he has no fixed address, he’s always dirty and hungry his long dark hair often matted his head. He has turned to petty theft. He doesn't trust anyone who wants to help, like Ainsley, a former street kid now working her way through school to become a social worker.

This quote represents what God/Jesus was trying to teach about morality and ethics in this passage. Many people in today’s world are putting more of their focus toward following their own traditions, ideas, and rules instead of following the 10 commandments that God gave us. Although human tradition may play an important role in your life, it should never overpower God’s rules. If you constantly say that you are a devoted follower of God, then you need to represent that in your words and actions every day of your life by following the rules that God has given us to live

The Divine Command Theory is the assertion in ethics that an action is morally right if, and only if, it conforms to God’s will. This premise ties together morality and religion in a manner that seems expected, since it provides a solution to arguments about moral relativism and the objectivity of ethics. On the other hand, in Plato’s Euthyphro, Socrates questions whether something is right because God commands it, or whether God commands it because it is right. The ethical implications of the Euthyphro problem suggest that the relationship between morality and religion might not be as straightforward as suggested by the Divine Command Theory.

Theories of Relativity Opinion Essay: Why We Should Read This Novel in the ENG3C Course

Throughout history, people have been trying to create an improved, fair, and equal system of justice, not only to better society in which one lives, but to also find a sense of meaning in what responsibilities people should hold within their civilizations in order to create this just way of living. As early as the Old Testament within the Bible, we see examples of how the Hebrews formed their own justice. This can be seen in the in text of the Ten Commandments which were written in a form of law. Laws were significant even in this basic form of context, such as the Ten Commandments, which offered the ideas of right and wrongdoings and the sin for violating others for one’s own benefit. This not only

of that, we are better off living in a world of moral rules. Without there rules

Humans need to be told what to do, without command people just do as they please. For example, even as children, parents have to tell their children what to do otherwise they will seriously harm themselves or others. The ways children learn is from their parents and so on. As a result, we could not be able to create our own morals, and without these commands not be able to evolve. No matter what religion or non-religion people are there are moral absolutes that everyone pretty much follows.

A better example of something to keep humans in line is the Ten Commandments in Exodus. They outline what humans should and should not do in their everyday life; things like not killing others and praising only God. I also believe, whether it is to be admitted or not, some cultures used this as an excuse/reason for natural disasters. For example, if a hurricane struck an island and destroyed homes and lots of land, then it would be common belief that the blame was on someone in the village that angered the gods since, at the time, hurricanes weren’t something that were exactly

These virtuous standards directs our actions in order that nonviolent societies might be. Many individuals acquire ethical standards from their family, their peers at institutes, in religious settings, or in other public locations. While a record amount of societies obtain their logic of that which is

In the article Unspeakable Ethics, Unnatural Laws, Arthur A. Leff took an agnostic approach when determining what morality should be comprised of. He suggested that humans struggle with desiring to follow a predetermined and unchallengeable set of moral rules, while at the same time wanting the autonomy to create those rules.

These were handed down by God to govern the ways that people behave. But other religions that are not similar to Christianity have ethical codes as well. For example, many religions have elaborate sets of bans that govern their adherents behaviors. Although religion means something different to those of faith, it carries a immeasurable and persuasive movement of moral and ethical standards that guide the way for humans. While there may be such a wide range of belief systems, religion has a complex set of spiritual and cultural rules and rituals. There are several types of religions in the world today, most of which worships and practices differently. Most of the traditions, beliefs, and rituals these religions are consisted of our

Furthermore, if you cannot have ethics without God, which one of God’s teachings should be following. Should the teachings in the old testament championing an “eye for an eye” be tossed aside in favour of the new testament teaching of us to “turn the other cheek”. If God’s will is good, then it is both morally right to exact revenge, as well as demonstrate forgiveness to an injustice. I argue that this argument challenges the premise that God is omniscient as in the old testament, God commands and permits one act, and in the new testament contradicts and supports an entirely different act. If we follow the DCT and assume that as God’s will is good then both commands are correct, then it is up to the individual to decide which moral action to take. If such freedom is possible in making moral decisions, then divine command may not always be needed to satisfy our moral duties.

Obeying by the natural law theory is the only true and moral way to live life; especially a life lived in God’s image. God’s presence is a guiding factor to obtaining a moral and virtuous life, which can only be obtained by following the natural law theory. God created a set of laws as a supreme guide for humans to live life, like any law these laws were created to ensure wellbeing for everyone. The laws he created are the civil law, the natural law and the divine law God created them from a law much superior than the rest, one which only God himself has the knowledge of, the eternal law. Humans actively participate in the eternal law of God by using reason in conformity with the Natural Law to discern what is good and evil(Magee 1). Of

These should be the only rules that may overrule a person's actions, for the more restricted a person's action becomes, the less likely it is that they'll submit to those restrictions. The reason morals may overrule a person's actions because these rules are justified. Without justification, there is no reason at all for people to obey the rules, for in their eyes, the rules would be arbitrary, and thus would lack any sort of authority over people.