preview

Jacksonian Democracy

Decent Essays

The inauguration of Andrew Jackson marked a key transition in American politics. His election was viewed as the coming to power of the “common man.” The contentious Jacksonian Era was merely the ascendancy of Jackson along with the Democratic Party beginning in 1830. Jacksonianism politics appeared subjugate to Indians and increased racial division, while expanding white male power. Critics emerged in opposition believing the power and influence extended to Jackson was excessive. Although the Whig Party considered Jackson a tyrant, Jacksonian Democracy is a political impulse dedicated to powerful egalitarian ideals of expanded suffrage and the nation’s borders, though racial at times, mostly benefiting the white male population.
A new generation …show more content…

Jackson believed that the common (white) man should be involved in the democratic movement. Democracy defined American nationality and its ideas of freedom. Jacksonian leaders grew the democratic ideology that America could not survive without a citizenry of economically independent men. The motivation of the people was equal rights unbiased of property ownership, proclaiming that ownership did not empower intellectual superiority. To further expound on this, Eric Foner writes, “Owning Property, declared a petition by ‘Non-Freeholder’[landless men] of Richmond to the Virginia constitutional convention of 1829, did not necessary mean the possession of ‘moral or intellectual endowments’ superior to this of the poor.”(357) By the 1860’s all but one state had removed the entitlement of property ownership in order to vote. The right to vote now rested on the person rather than property giving fuel the ideology of Individualism. As the white male population increased racism …show more content…

The Whig party viewed the market revolution as the embodiment of civilized progress that would provide more opportunities with carefully guided economic growth. To accomplish this growth, Foner states, “So the Whigs thought that you would actually expand freedom by having the government promote economic development, by having a tariff on industry, by promoting internal improvements.” (video) Democracts seemed to be alarmed by the separation of social classes, having a “hands off” approach to the market revolution. They adopted the idea that ordinary citizens should have the right to test the market without government interference. These differences cultivated yet another two party system that would debate the American

Get Access