CDA News has reported both on the open letter from Taylor Swift to Apple and the open leter response to the recording artist by photographer Jason Seldon. In Swift’s letter, she says Apple is being unfair to recording artists by giving subscribers free access for three months and not pay recording artists royalties. Seldon’s letter is becoming a voice for photojournalism in the 21st century, saying what so many photographers have faced during what is best described as a rights war with the music industry.
Seldon’s response to Swift’s rant says that it is hypocritical of her to take this stance when photographers at her concerts are forced to sign over the rights to their photos to her and her management company, Firefly Entertainment, Inc.
…show more content…
Three months, not perpetually. The fact is, promotion and publicity both are considered commercial use, and photographers should be paid a licensing fee for photos used in this manor.
In all honesty, Swift is not the mastermind behind this practice. It is something that photographers have battled with for a long time. These contracts, or rights grabs, have been going on for years. Typically it is seen with artists that would have no problem with the financial aspect of paying a normal licensing fee.
While Seldon’s letter to Swift got a lot of press coverage, photographer Jared Polin also stepped up against Live Nation. Live Nation is the owner of Ticketmaster and various concert venues around the United States. Live Nation sent out an email soliciting for a house photographer to work concerts at the Ascend Amphitheater. This was a unpaid position and besides the photographer signing away their rights to the photos without any monetary compensation, they were required to either shoot every single show on the music calendar for the venue, or find a substitute, also for free, to shoot what they could not
…show more content…
He stated he had never seen the release. He said that he has always allowed photographers there for the whole show and to allow them to shoot and use the photos however they wanted. If he or his band wanted to use photos, a mutual agreement was always made. However, he did not approve any new agreement that was a rights grab and he was going fix this error. However, Franti’s response is rare. Normally there is no response from management companies or artists.
Now, photographers, newspapers, and other photojournalism outlets are taking a stand against these artists and their management companies by taking the war to them. The Irish Times not only would not have their photographer sign away the rights to photos he was taking for the newspaper to Swift, they published an article stating that due to this contract for the concert photos, there would be no photographs from the show with the review article. In addition, the Washington City Paper attacked the rights grabbing contract of the Foo Fighters by publishing an article about why they are not shooting their
Even so, when the artist put their time and hard work into making songs that will catch the subscribers attention just for it be free. For instance, Jacob Carter of “The Changing Landscape of the Music Business” quotes “In November of 2014, award-winning musician Taylor Swift pulled her entire music catalog from Spotify, a popular streaming app, claiming that their business model suggests that music does not hold much worth.” This shows that Taylor Swift does not believe with the fact that her music is just out there for free and she not receiving money just for it be out there for the public. Thus, Darrius Johnson of “Selling Out Not Worth the Risk” quotes “In many situations, a record label owns the rights to an artist’s music, and if they license a song to a company or other party the artist has no control over how the song can be used.” To clarify, this information artists would not have their own opinion of doing any commercial because their music doesn’t belong to them but the record labels. This proves, that some artist has their opinion about their music they make and they just want to be free for the world to have because they took their time to create
As an artist, the protection of all intellectual property created for distribution should be a priority. The type of protection this case focuses on is the protection granted by copyright. When a piece of work is copyrighted, the copyright grants the creator the exclusive right to use and distribute the piece for the duration of their life plus 70 years. As a creator, copyrighting completed art before disclosing the art with any other interests is very beneficial when proving ownership in a federal court proceeding. Devin Copeland v. Justin Bieber is a case that is based around the copyrights to a song entitled “Somebody to Love”. The facts will be introduced, followed by the issues that arose in court, then the courts analysis of those issues, closing with the lessons learned to be applied to the future of Planet Florida Artist Managements business ventures.
Phillis Wheatley’s Letter to Samson Occom is an amazing piece of history. She uses many different writing styles and punctuations to get her point across. She is writing this letter to the Reverend Samson Occom, addressing the rights that he has recognized. This letter is different from previous articles we have read by Phillis Wheatley. She did not have much ending punctuation, or sentence breaks. She had run on sentences, and archaic words. Also she had many words with capitalization out of place.
Does Taylor accurately represent the plight of the modern artist who has been swallowed by the digital economy? Or does she miss the point of the new wave of media access completely?
Throughout our Communication Studies, we have examined the capitalist economy through a critical lens and as a result, corporations always appear at the forefront of debate, blame, and power. From a neo-liberalist economic standpoint, the typical “prosumer” is encouraged to create consumer-generated content, but what happens when you put your creative labour to the test? York University consistently advocates, “this is your time”; in other words, students are responsible for their own success and are held liable for any failures or mishaps they may endure. While contemporary technologies have multiplied and democratized opportunities for musical creativity, intellectual property law has been used to repress our right to free speech, which is guaranteed under the first amendment (Demers 2006). Therefore, the industry’s effort at convincing people that file-sharing is equivalent to thievery have turned an increasing number of artists into intellectual property activists.
Taylor Swift really knows how to have hidden messages and secrets throughout her lyrics and music videos. Taylor Swift also likes to trash talk other celebrities including Kim Kardashian and Katy Perry. Which gives a viewer a good chance to critic her lyrics and videos.
While David Lowery’s argument is made strong by his pathos and ethos. His logos or lack thereof pulls his argument down. On June 16th, 2012 Emily White published an article on how she had hardly ever purchased music, then on June 18 David Lowery respond to her article in a response that swept the nation, it lead him to a platform to speak on this topic and he is now one of the leading advocates for musicians’ rights.
Caswell tributes the Revolutionary War leader and the State’s first Governor, Richard Caswell. It serves people with mental retardation and other developmental disabilities. Over the years Caswell’s patients have declined. It is also the states oldest residential facility for people with intellectual disabilities. Dr, Hardy had a lot to do with the development of Caswell. He had a daughter that was mentally retarded, it was then when he realized he needed a school for the “feebleminded.” In 1914, The Stroud House, which is no longer used to my knowledge, was home to 15 young women known as the first admissions.
Reading the first letter from Jourdan Anderson, one of the meanings of freedom one can take away from the tone of Anderson’s diction is the freedom to throw shade. Seriously, Anderson is now a free man and thus free to write smugly to his former master, and eloquently so. His letter essentially tells the Colonel there is no chance in hell that he and his family will return to live with the man who previously enslaved them. Anderson also expressed he knew he was already a free man in response to the Colonel promising his freedom upon his return. Anderson states, “there is nothing to be gained on that score, as I got my free papers in 1864 from the Provost-Marshal-General of the Department of Nashville.” That line asserts to the Colonel that going returning to Big Spring would not be advantageous because he can already live freely with his family. He does not need, nor want to return to the Colonel’s home.
Palmer tells stories about her art of asking. She uses twitter to send out tweets and her fans will respond, giving her band a place to stay, eat, or just hang out. Palmer continues to grab the audience’s attention with perplexity. It’s not often you’ll hear of someone couch surfing and crowd surfing. These personal stories give Palmer strong credibility because she went through these experiences first hand. Testimony is used as a support material when Palmer tells the story of pulling up to a poor neighborhood in Miami and finding out the 18-year-old girl they were supposed to stay with lived with the rest of her family, all undocumented immigrants from Honduras. The mother says, "Your music has helped my daughter so much. Thank you for staying here. We 're all so grateful." This quote proves Palmer’s point that they all give and receive so much from each other. When people genuinely see each other, they want to help each other. This goes back to Palmer’s thesis of artists being directly supported by fans.
So protest they did, in Kansas City, Missouri, on Friday night where the rock band Foo Fighters were playing at Spint Center.
On January 28, 1985 Jermaine Lamarr Cole was born in Frankfurt Germany. Better known as J. Cole, he's become one of the biggest rappers in the game alongside Kendrick Lamar and Drake. As much as it seems like I criticize Cole, over the years he turned into one of my favorite all time rappers. To celebrate the Birthday of J. Cole, I wanted to take the time and look back on the projects he provided for listeners. In my humble opinion, here is the order in which I rank his projects. These are my views only, and doesn't reflect the opinions of the other moboombox members. (Excluding EP's and compilation albums)
Earlier in the year Front Porch Step’s Jake McElfresh was accused of sexual misconduct and harassment by several underage girls. A petition started on Change.org states that “There have been multiple cases of Jake Mcelfresh talking to underage girls and sending them vulgar photos. He has been asked to stop by these girls every time and continues with the sexual statements and harassment.” Due to these allegations, the petition requests that Front Porch Steps not be allowed to play this year’s Vans Warped Tour, citing that he would have unlimited access to underage girls who often attend the shows. Warped Tour producer Kevin Lyman addressed the severity of the issue through Twitter and even cut his vacation short so he could deal with the
There are several ways in which art is commercialized; especially within the music industry. Classic bands such as the Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan were criticized for allowing companies to use their material to sell products and services. However, this is a common avenue for a musician or an artist to profit from their works. Many companies are willing to pay a hefty premium to have their products associated with music that has broad emotional appeal to many potential consumers. However, many people feel that when an artist licenses their material it is a loss of integrity and that something is lost by the commercialization of their songs.
For my Taylor Swift assignment, I took very detailed notes on the music video to try and help me get a good idea of exactly what was going on. I then decided to have my main focus on the dark spots on Taylor Swifts career. I decided to focus on these because most of the music video focused in on her past and how it has changed her to be a new person. In the video, there was also reference to taboos which I explained in my writing. I was very confident on this paper and decided not to revise for that reason.