Would you buy a car with bad brakes and drive it until they failed? Who would buy a home and ignore serious flaws by skipping an inspection? So why would you partner with a technology services vendor that agrees to work with your technology “as is”?
It never ceases to amaze while in discussions with a prospective client when it comes up that the competition is willing to take over management of the network practically sight unseen. These other vendors must be somewhat aware of the obsolete servers and unpatched firewalls in place. Yet, they forge ahead with support without disclosing the security vulnerabilities, the data backup shortcomings, or the fact that the server operating system has not been patched for months!
Then what happens, soon after, when network issues arise that require significant attention and investment? You may find yourself facing a complete outage or suboptimal performance due to components failing. You may face large, unanticipated bills to replace equipment at the most inopportune times of your
…show more content…
Think of it like an ongoing wellness program. A healthy network creates value with happier, more productive staff; fewer customer frustrations and increased returns on investment. Instead of making knee-jerk technology investments, a true Technology Management approach starts with an in-depth inspection. It follows with discussions about long term business objectives and includes details about the investments needed to achieve business goals. Like a gym membership and a healthy diet, once the upgrades are completed, monitoring and management continues the work of maintaining consistent health. Regular review meetings ensure that technology keeps pace with growth and changing objectives. The most competent vendors will include in these reviews detailed budgeting to remove surprises and assist in decision making well in advance of critical
The consequences of having a large footprint of unreliable / misconfigured hardware is pretty significant in that through one single action of hardware failure, the system can be brought to a standstill pending diagnosis and
event of a catastrophic disruption (fire) or disaster (hurricane) and a major IT or data center outage occurs
* Lack of Redundancy - The networks currently only have one path out. For instance, if the gateway/switch at the Hangzhou, China plant goes down, the various departments running off that switch will be isolated from the rest of the network.
When businesses provide computers for public use, several challenges are presented. In addition to allowing the general public this service, and ultimately growing their market share, a business must define the line between appropriate use and securing the network.
No matter the business to goal is to profit with little cost of attaining the profit. Technology has the most dramatic effect on business. A newer faster operating system can improve the efficiency to the company. New technology almost always offers way to make things run smoother with less chance or error and stay ahead of the competition. Not being caught up the newest technology can lead the competitor to have the upper hand. Employees will feel more confident and less likely to question the progress of the company if technology is something that isn’t lacking. The first step of the four function of management is planning. Planning cannot be done if there is not technology, much less up to date technology. Planning is a never ending step in the process, it is necessary for a company to sustain. Organizing the next step. Management must organize the structure of the business and evenly distribute the resources. Technology helps setting up and distributing the right information to the right departments. Directing, step number three requires never ending communication. This allows managers to allocate tasks to fix areas of weakness to improve and strengthen a company. Controlling is the last of the four functions. Technology helps companies establish standards, and help show ones job performance. Having this as a tool helps with areas of improvement for lower level members of a company as well as on up to the big dogs. Controlling is
When technology fails we will need to consider that going back to the old ways maybe our only choice. Sending men and women into battle was our only option in the past. We should not be complacent and stop training men and women to fight for our great nation. If and when technology fails, and we are not properly prepared, then we will lose this country that our fore-fathers have fought with their blood and sweat.
When a customer is trying to conduct business in which their revenue depends on the reliability of providing stable internet and voice services, but the company that is providing them these services continually experiences outages in this customer's area, this type of chain reaction causes a dissatisfied customer. WRC's clients who experience continuous, All Service Down (ASD) outages for several hours a day run the risk of losing a significant amount of money. Often due to the geographical area, some of the cables becomes corroded or submerged in water which results in repeat service interruption for consumers in a zone. Due to the area, it becomes extremely costly to replace these cables. Therefore the organization takes the risk of
Given that the development of new systems can be fraught with problems and delays, there are many factors that drive organisations to develop new systems. The most important drives come directly from the companies needs and are often not related to technology, but however to technological solutions, these include:
Auspiciously, during the marketing of Brightways, it became clear that the ROADM unification solution had themes in common with a larger movement unfolding in networking that of network virtualization. Furthermore, taking a step up to an original equipment manufacturer –OEM of networking is a much bigger opportunity than the lower realm of ODM. The networking universe is composed of many more targets, however there are mega-networking companies satisfying that multibillion-dollar market like Cisco, Juniper, Brocade, and Avaya. Although, successful startups in networking can gain a billion dollar capitalization with the right technology. That is foreseeable factoring in that the cost of information technology rivals NFL stadiums for just a single
What is the business rationale for making the technology investment? This is one of the most important questions to ask. Almost all companies depend on some technology solution to deliver goods and services. Investing in new technologies for the sake of having the latest up-to-date systems, just does not seem to cut it in the minds of most industry executives, nor does trying to rationalize a major technology investment solely on the basis of reducing ongoing maintenance costs of the old systems. Information technology usually does not have a direct impact on the bottom line. “IT is applied to business processes, and it is those business processes that increase revenue or reduce expenses” [Berman,Knight]. This implies
Many organizations often choose an enabling technology before identifying any legitimate business need. Sometimes this "cart before the horse" approach is due to rigid business processes, lack of technical knowledge, or pure product hype, which commands many a tech guru’s attention. Decision makers are very often awed by product suite success stories, dynamite product demonstrations, and industry analysts ' evaluation of technology, even when they haven’t formally identified a need for the technology. To compete successfully, managers need to focus on validating that a business need exists
Automated processes and network links for sharing data will change from time to time and hardware components will fail. This means there is an ongoing need to monitor and manage physical sharing arrangements and resolve failures as they arise. Once sharing arrangements are established if it may be assumed that everything will continue to operate without failure – and often they will for years, but when there is a failure it then can take some time to identify the issue and resolve it. This takes us into the need to manage data sharing.
Organizations and its employees have to make decisions and solve problems on a daily basis. URS (An AECOM Company) Federal Services provides program management and technical services to the US Government, and engineering design, planning, and construction services for public and private businesses. URS also provides technology test and evaluation (T&E) support, with the US Military as one of its largest customers (URS, 2015). The T&E group serves as an independent evaluator for new and emerging technologies. As part of the T&E services, URS conducts technology assessments and provides the government with an unbiased report on the technology’s functional capabilities at the conclusion of the assessment period. The report is used to assist the government with its decision on whether or not to purchase the technology. The purpose of this paper is to discuss an organizational challenge that was encountered by URS while supporting its government customer and the company’s approach to solving the problem, and the outcome.
More or less most of security technologies are available from different vendor, with some marginal difference in terms of features and process; buyers are in more bargaining power stage. The market transparency and the involvement of third party advisors (Nick Wilkinson accessed January/15 2013) provide more space for customer to bargain with suppliers. Leading service providers, who have IT security as a part of their