Talking about live exports of Australian animals
Slide 3: Here are cattle and sheep enjoying life in Australia
Slide 4: This is how our animals can be treated after they are exported.
How on earth can we let this happen?!? We have come such a long way in the last 200 years as a country and we should be proud of how we have evolved into a humane and caring society.
We now have legislated rights for animals, with each State strictly enforcing Animal Welfare laws.
However, Slide 5: there is a big gap in the way we let other people treat our animals once they leave our shores
Slide 6: The examples of barbaric treatment of the Australian animals in other countries have lead to a public outcry and demands, by animal welfare groups, to ban
…show more content…
SECONDLY: A large Australian industry would be devastated.
Figures show that in 2011, 700,000 cattle and 2.5 million sheep worth nearly a billion dollars were exported
THE THIRD serious consequence would be that thousands of jobs would be lost. The live export sector employs around 10,000 people in rural and regional
…show more content…
- Secondly: A ban will not convert importers to package meat as some people would suggest.
Countries that import live animals often do so for religious or cultural reasons, which require that the animals be killed locally. They also have a lack of refrigeration facilities. For these people importing packaged meat is not an option.
Slide 14: Yes, I do agree that something has to change, but there is a better solution than a total ban!
An Australian Government Senate Report on the Live Trade, recommended all the importers and their abattoirs, feedlots and other handling facilities be registered by the Australian government to meet minimum standards.
It proposes that live animal exporters be forced to track every beast to the point of slaughter in every export market to ensure humane treatment.
This would be enforced with surveillance cameras and inspections without notice.
The great thing about the proposal is that it will avoid banning live animal exports thereby protecting a vibrant Australian industry and at the same time protecting the welfare of Australian
Over time, there have been several exposés by animal rights activists published revealing the maltreatment of Australian exported cattle, goats and sheep. This is the harsh reality that Australian animals face practically daily.
Rangeland and pastures occupy about 55 percent of the total land area; on this are raised the world's largest number of sheep, producing more wool than any other country. Other livestock include cattle, about one-twelfth for dairying, and pigs. Beef and cattle hides are important products.
Today in the US, people do not consume horse meat on a whole sale basis. But because many other counties do, the exporting of horse meat is a huge industry. When the ban was in place, US horses were being transported to Canada and Mexico to be slaughtered instead. From 2006 to 2010 the increase in horses being exported to Canada and Mexico was 148 and 660 percent. They are loaded up on trailers and shipped across the boarders, often times going days without food or water until they reach their destination. The regulations, or lack thereof, are different than in the US. (Shesgreen)
rise Australia's efficiency and add to higher GDP growth by sanctioning domestic businesses admittance to inexpensive inputs, leading innovative technologies, and nurturing competition and advancement
Animal welfare conditions overseas would decline if Australian stopped exporting livestock. Australia is the only country in the world that actively works in overseas markets to improve animal welfare conditions. Approximately 95% of Australian cattle in Indonesia are now stunned pre-slaughter, up from less than 10% in 2011.
The Meat Inspection Act of 1906 was an attempt to regulate the meatpacking industry and to assure consumers that the meat they were eating was safe. In brief, this act made compulsory the careful inspection of meat before its consummation, established sanitary standards for slaughterhouses and processing plants, and required continuous U.S. Department of Agriculture inspection of meat processing and packaging. Yet, the most important objectives set by the law are the prevention of adulterated or misbranded livestock and products from being commercialized and sold as food, and the making sure that meat and all its products are processed and prepared in the adequate sanitary and hygienic conditions (Reeves 35). Imported meat and its various
By using this research methodology as the first source, enabled me to access opinion data, scientific information, and historic examples. This method provided the most effective and valuable information for determining who set the animal right laws, how they are enforced in Australia, and community opinions regarding the subject. Additionally, the validity of the internet sources was due to the in-depth explanation that was obtained from each source which developed the groundwork for the key findings. For example, in both the South Australian Animal Welfare Regulations document and Inspectorate Services of the RSPCA site, information was obtained elucidating that the RSPCA is the major animal right law enforcer and they possess the power to enter private property and seize animals. By analysing opinion data from a variety of sources I developed my ethical understanding by accepting the motivations of others and eliminating any opinion of my
Eating less meat would benefit the the impact on global warming and increase food security (Sealing).
The idea of animal rights has been around for centuries. Even decades ago, people were taking action for the welfare of animals. Marc Bekoff and Ned Hettinger share this idea all the way back in 1994 when they said that there is evidence that scientist are concerned with animal welfare by acknowledge that they use the guidelines in place to protect animals during research, in order to have their work published (Bekoff 219). Guidelines are the basis for the moral and ethical treatment of animals. Each person may have his or her own standard, but having a standard among the entire population ensures the welfare of the animals. Unfortunately, these standards are not at a level to where the animals are being protected. Many animals in captivity are treated in ways that would shock the average person. Orcas for example, are starved until they do the desired task (Cowperthwaite). This form of operant condition can lead to success, but often leads to resentment and hostility towards the trainers.
Many people may not know that animal cruelty has been around for hundreds of years. . In the article "Animal Cruelty Prosecution" published by American Prosecution Research Institute found that, The Puritans of the Massachusetts Bay Colony established “The Body of Liberties” found by the Animal Cruelty Prosecution, in 1641. The Body of Liberties was a document written for the protection of animals from unnecessary pain and suffering. Animal cruelty happens every day whether it is from starving, beating, lack of medical care or proper housing for animals. We are in need of stricter laws to help fight the rights of animals. Animal laws should be more strict on people
In 1989, it is said that countries placed a ban on the import of ruminants and ruminant products, which meant that any plant based food mammal was not to cross countries to keep from other contamination. Later than in 1997, there was to a ban based on the feeding of ruminants to other ruminants. Since January 2044, the USDA has also excluded all cows that are unable to ambulate (“downer” cows) are at high risk for BSE disease and shall not be sold for animal meet or consumed by any nature. The best way to avoid the consumption of ingesting this meat is to;
Thesis Statement: The U.S. government should ban factory farms and require the meat industry to raise animals in their natural environments.
Australia’s primary exports lie in natural resources and agricultural commodities (Siriwardana, 2015). The Australian beef industry is the sixth largest exporter in the world where average beef exports from Australia are approximately 1.3 million tonnes, amounting to approximately 65% of total beef production (Tozer and Marsh, 2012). In a global context, Australia is the sixth largest beef producer and the second largest beef exporter, therefore it would be most efficient for Australia to trade with other nations who produce and export beef less effectively (Meat & Livestock Australia, 2016).
In February of this year, Russia issued a ban on US meat imports, warning it would remain in place until the US agrees to certify that the meat is Ractopamine-free. As reported by Pravda, Russia is the fourth largest importer of US meats, purchasing about
They forbid the use of “routine antibiotics” as well as insure that the animals bought from their farmers are allowed to mature naturally “so they do not suffer the health problems associated with accelerated growth”