Politics issues makes unusual associates' is an axiom that has managed the test of time. Whether its Republicans and Democrats making arrangements in Congress, or Joseph and Pharaoh administering Egypt in the Old Testament, the nature of legislative issues and the needs of the state can frequently require an odd blend of characters. Such was the situation in the eighteenth century, when a few rulers of Central and Western Europe embraced and actualized goals of the Enlightenment, a learned development which overall denied that governments were the premise of political force!
Illuminated oppression and its equivalent, edified absolutism, are terms history specialists utilization to portray the approaches of a few eighteenth century European
…show more content…
These rulers endeavored to enhance their states through the individual usage of Enlightenment thoughts while in the meantime keeping up, or actually upgrading, monarchical-control over the undertakings of the state.
In France, government was impacted by illumination beliefs, however what couple of measures Louis XV (and his grandson, Louis XVI) took, fizzled. Some Enlightenment goals permeated into French government amid their rules, however this was mainly attained to by their capable overseers and consultants. For instance, Louis XV depended the undertakings of the French state to his previous mentor, Hercule de Fleury. It was a result of Fleury's monetary changes that the French economy recouped and the government was further enabled in the wake of being profoundly in the red after the wars of Louis XIV.
Louis XV, while not having much taste for governmental issues, did enliven some Enlightenment standards. Despite these minor accomplishments, Louis XV still denied the first distribution of Diderot's Encyclopédie in the 1750s, and his refusal to control his extravagant tastes and lavish court life left the French government almost destroyed monetarily upon his demise in
The 17th century of European history, colloquially known as the “Age of Crisis”, gave rise to a new form of government: absolutism. Religious wars, economic troubles, inflation, and new agricultural challenges such as the Little Ice Age wracked the nations of Europe and caused tremendous fear and uncertainty among the masses. Thus, as many felt that life itself was endangered, they were willing to accept the rise of a strong, independent ruler who might lead them from the darkness. In this way, absolutism emerged- a new form of monarchy based on a hereditary ruler with complete authority. Perhaps the most well known example of an absolute monarch in European history is Louis XIV, the ruler of France from 1643 to 1715.
The Age of Enlightenment saw many great changes in Western Europe. It was an age of reason and philosophes. During this age, changes the likes of which had not been seen since ancient times took place. Such change affected evert pore of Western European society. Many might argue that the Enlightenment really did not bring any real change, however, there exists and overwhelming amount of facts which prove, without question, that the spirit of the Enlightenment was one of change-specifically change which went against the previous teachings of the Catholic Church. Such change is apparent in the ideas, questions, and philosophies of the time, in the study of science, and throughout the monarchial system.
It is often debated whether or not the reign of King Louis XIV had a positive or negative effect on France. Although there were improvements during his reign in transportation, culture, and national defense, there were far more negative aspects. He depleted the national treasury with his liberal spending on personal luxuries and massive monuments. His extreme fear of the loss of power led to poor decision making, which caused the court to be of lower quality. King Louis XIV’s disastrous rule brought about a series of effects that influenced the French Revolution in the following century.
Louis XIV, the ruler of France from the late seventeenth century to the early eighteenth century, claimed, “I am the state.” He considered this to be absolutism. His goal, also acquainted with absolutism, was, “one king, one law, one faith;” Furthermore, Louis wanted to promote religious unity, royal dignity, and security of the state. In order to achieve this goal, he had to rule with a firm hand, laying down the law for all to see. Louis XIV’s absolutism fostered in four major parts: the building of Versailles to control the nobility, the breeding of a strong military, the improvement of France’s economy, and, while quite harsh, the brutal extinction of religious toleration.
The eighteenth century embraced the beginning of an opinionated movement for new thinking about once unquestioned truths and actions. This movement, known as the enlightenment was more than a period of advanced ideas, as this unfamiliar way of thinking also lead to a change in the way that people began to operate within society. The ambition was lead by the attempt to break free from the past, overturning old ideas and moving forward. Enlightenment thinkers helped in spreading the idea that individuals could find universal truths for themselves while improving society through reasoning and science. Enlightenment thinkers who emulate these spreading of
Before the Enlightenment, every law and every decision was made and accepted, only by the King. There was a traditional social structure consisting of the monarchy on the top, followed by the nobles and clergy, and then all of the lower class on the bottom, which included peasants, merchants, and craftsman. When the people of the Western a Society began to receive ideas from Enlightenment scholars and thinkers, the began to realize how wrong the ways of the King were. They began to revolt against and disagree with these ways of the King. These people, motivated by the ideas of the Enlightenment, challenged the traditional social and political structures of the Western society to eventually lead to human rights for everyone.
After reading this book I understand a lot more about the French Revolution. Most of the problems that occurred dealt with the idea of change. Some people like things the way they are, some are afraid of change, and others would like to see something new. Louis XVI wanted things the way they were and be treated as a king is supposed to be treated, and
Louis XIV 's France was an absolute monarchy, meaning the king had the power, control, finances and the nation in his hands more then ever before. In the 17th century, France was the strongest and wealthiest nation in Europe, and the head of the state, the king, was the most influential person of the time. In the ideas of the scientific revolution and the soon-coming changes of the enlightenment the country was developing. For a few decades France was not involved in any major wars or battles and the peace helped the population grow fast.
Louis XIV made various economic reforms for France, with the help of Jean Baptiste Colbert, Louis’ finance minister, who believed in the idea of a self-sufficient economic system. He increased the taxes on the citizens which increased the power of the intendants, people who collect taxes for the King. Colbert and Louis agreed to give government funds to French companies so the economy could flourish. Higher taxes were placed on goods from other countries, so citizens would begin to buy French goods. Louis also encouraged people to move to the French-Canadian colony, to create for land for trade and wealth (The Reign of Louis XIV). Doing this, Louis was able to control society more than ever and exert his Absolute rule over all of French society. All of these economic reforms made France self-sufficient and a larger power in Europe. The money gained could be used to fight in wars that would expand France 's boundaries, or to spread the arts throughout France. These reforms caused other countries to see France as a higher power in Europe and create a strong reputation for Louis XIV as a ruler.
Although Louis XIV, also known as Louis the Great, brought death and destruction through his wars, there are many positive aspects of his reign, such as the creation of Versailles and the building of France’s national army. He did what had never been done before. He changed the lifestyle and the attitude of France by creating one of the most powerful monarchies ever to be built and at the same time, reassured all the nobility and other wealthy groups of their political and social standings. He made it clear that he was the final decision maker yet he still needed the help of the nobility and other authorities.
Some people think that King Louis XIV did more harm to France than good. They cite his lack of moderation in managing his money. They also point out that Louis denied religious liberties to the Protestants of France and tightened control over his Roman Catholic subjects by revoking the Edict of Nantes. They also claim Louis’ war efforts were very costly and drained the treasury of France. Some say his arrogance, including his emblem of the “Sun King”, turned “his” people away from him. They think that Louis only cared about himself and what he wanted and didn’t think about future France.
Louis XIV was charitable. He did open a veterans’ hospital in 1670 to house ex-soldiers. He opened academies for dance, inscriptions, sciences, architecture and music. These academies set standards for taste. He annexed valuable land such as Flanders and Franche-Comte. Louis’ decision to suppress the Protestant religion can be seen as a political move to join France under one religion and to build national unity.
Many think he left France worse off than it started because of the way he left the treasury. It was thought that he spent the money only on himself, leaving the peasants with no money. It is also said that he spent the money on building his residences (Versailles and Marly) and supporting his luxurious lifestyle. Another argument brought up is how he was so egotistical. One reason for his being egotistical was the fact that he was thought of as “God Given” because the court was hoping that Louis XIII would have a child before he died. People talk about how he compared himself to the sun. As ruler Louis, thought of himself as the sun, which meant he was the center of the kingdom and his subjects rotated around him. Some see this as incredibly egotistical and thought that made him less of a ruler. One aspect of his being the sun was the fact that his bedroom was placed in the middle of the castle; he was always center of attention, as the sun would be. The other reason people think he was a negative influence on France was the fact that as soon as the last Prime minister died, Louis made himself the ruler. He decided to make all the decisions by himself, with no help. Some think this was a bad idea because he had no previous ruling experience by himself. These same people were angered when Louis re-established Catholicism, nullifying the Edict of Nantes. Some of the people of
Politics into if they wanted economic improvement and political changes that were believed to be possible. It was the people 's will, and rulers provisions in enlightening to centralize authority that will improve their land. Their prime target was their nation development above everything else. For example in France, there were wars of Louis XIV that left debts and more of disturbance to the economy that needs for administrative reform was urgent and necessary. There was the development of numerous scholars who began to compose themes that identified with government, legislative issues and composers. Individuals read the compositions and now started pondering the works. They additionally thought of their assessments successive to being enlightened. The political cause had the following effect on enlightenment regime; it usually ended the privileges of the goodness. They also came with another view of slavery as barbaric.
During the eighteenth century there was one central political cause for the French Revolution. King Louis XVI was a weak ruler who endured a lavish lifestyle. He disregarded the people’s needs, leaving much of the French population in discontent. Prior to the revolution the form of government was Absolute monarchy led by Louis XVI. The problem with absolute monarchy was that people were denied basic rights, and a say in government because the divine right theory was abused. The King ruled by the divine right of theory which