The issue of evil in the world raises questions with which everyone wrestles. Pain and suffering come into everyone’s life to some degree or another. Trying to find meaning and purpose in the midst of suffering, whether our own or someone else’s, is difficult regardless of what worldview one holds. How individuals and societies deal with this issue will have important implications for those individuals as well as to the whole of society.
The presence of evil in the world became horrifyingly apparent again on December 14, 2012 in Newtown, Connecticut. Shortly after 9:30 a.m. a lone gunman entered Sandy Hook Elementary School and brutally murdered six adults and 20 students, ages six and seven, then took his own life. There was no apparent reason
…show more content…
The physical world is all that exists. In their book, Making Sense of Your World: A Biblical Worldview, Phillips, Brown, and Stonestreet (2008), state that atheists believe the world is “governed by purely natural causes and processes, without any supernatural intervention or oversight” (p. 151). To the atheist, when something bad happens, it is merely bad luck. The problem atheists are confronted with is defining what qualifies as “good” in order to distinguish what is “evil.” With no objective standard for what is good, there is no objective standard for evil. Good and evil become subjective opinion. What is good for one person may not be for another. In Germany, the Brown Shirts held the belief that ethnic cleansing was a “good” thing, thus justifying the extermination of those the Reich deemed inferior. But can mere belief or group-think constitute what is good or evil, or is there an objective, transcendent definition that stands independent of the individual? The atheist must reply negatively to the transcendent definition, as the implication would be that there is a transcendent power or authority which issues this definition.
Atheists will acknowledge, and rightly so, that what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School was a horrible tragedy, but most will stop short of calling it evil. Instead, the focus is on gun control and psychological health. A statement made
…show more content…
They may even come to the conclusion that if there is a God, he cannot be good.
In contrast to Atheism and Agnosticism, Pantheism does not acknowledge the physical world as reality, but accepts only the spiritual world as real. According to Phillips et al. (2008), there are two approaches that Pantheism can take to resolve the issue of evil in the world. The first is to “suggest that any evil that occurs in the natural world [is] illusory. [The] second… explanation for evil and suffering is karma” (pp. 152-153).
Since Pantheism sees the physical world as an illusion, evil is illusionary as well. We are all connected to the universe, or to the One. We are not physical beings, but spiritual beings who need to detach from the physical world (from selfish living) in order to attain enlightenment. Failure to do so will result in the soul’s reincarnation until its journey is complete. Since evil is illusionary, a Pantheists would probably respond to the tragedy that took place at Sandy Hook Elementary School by detaching from the victims and letting them go. After all, to hang on to them would be clinging to the physical. The victims’ souls are on a spiritual journey back to the One, as is everyone. According to Philips et al. (2008), for the Pantheist, detachment from the illusion of the physical world and looking within to become one with ultimate reality is the
Therefore, the only reason one has to behave ‘morally’ is because god, the bible or Jesus says you should. Moreover, the consequences of behaving in contradiction to Christian values or behaving ‘immorally’ involve punishment by god whether it be in this life or the after-life. This philosophy sheds some light on why atheism is feared, despised and misunderstood as well as why atheists are persecuted in America. If there is no god to answer to or no consequences for ‘bad behavior’, why then, would anyone behave in a good moral fashion? What is to prevent deviant behavior, if there is no god? These questions are the main basis for the Christian argument which maintains that atheists are untrustworthy, immoral or amoral, social deviants and therefore lesser human beings. Some have gone as far to say that atheists are unpatriotic, un-American and do not even have the right to be acknowledged as citizens of the United States.
Sandy Hook was a chaotic town on December 14, 2012 where gunman, Adam Lanza, shot and killed twenty children and six staff members. Many family members of the victims are still mourning the loss of their children and loved ones. Over 500 lives were affected after this tragedy (Gay). The author gives an interview of the superintendent of the school in which he shows what he did after he heard the news of the shooting. “I was in the district office and my secretary told me the bus company reported a
If god was all good, all powerful and all knowing, he would not allow the existence of evil.
Everyone has a Worldview. “A collection of beliefs about life and the universe held by an individual or a group.” (1) Some have a Biblical Worldview. A Biblical Worldview is founded on the word of God. It is how a Christian views the world. Both belief systems are equally important to each individual, but there are differences in the way they view the natural world, human identity, human relationships, and culture.
How does being familiar with a biblical worldview help us understand the big picture of God’s design, and how can you apply that understanding to your calling?
The argument for the existence of God has been a debate for many centuries. God, in terms of philosophy, must be a supernatural being that: is all-knowing, is all-powerful, and is all-good. Theists believe God exists based on these terms; atheists on the other hand don’t believe in God. Atheists believe that if there is evil present in the universe, then there is no possible way God can exist if he is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent. Evil is defined in three different categories: human evil (evil we humans cause), natural evil (not in our control, of the Earth), and sufferings of the heart (not necessarily human/natural evil). The argument for the problem of evil is that God doesn’t exist because evil exists. In
Is there any satisfactory way of reconciling the existence of an omnipotent and all-loving God with the existence of natural evil (i.e. evil not due to the misuse of human free will)? One of the central claims of the Judaeo-Christian tradition is the existence of an omnipotent and all-loving God. Against this is the observation that people and animals suffer evil. By common sense, we would infer from this observation that God, as conceived in this tradition, does not exist - for, if He did, He would prevent the evil. This inference is called the Problem of Evil by those who profess one of the religions in the Judaeo-Christian tradition, and their attempts to 'solve' the problem have given rise to a labyrinth of sophistry.
The children after the traumatic massacre, probably would have to go through a very long healing process. A lot of the kids had the symptoms of PTSD which stands for post-traumatic stress disorder. Some kids never wanted to go back to school and others sometimes heard noises that triggered thoughts of the shooting. “But no one could erase those students’ memories.” A few of the students had siblings that had died, and they did not. “Many struggled to understand why their sisters or brothers had been taken away from them.” This shooting massacre didn't only affect the kids, it also affected America. A ton of the nation was in heartbreak after this event, they were traumatized. Many people were mourning for the 26 people who had lost their lives. Lots of people were scared of a “copycat” or someone that was inspired by Adam Lanza, to go and start another shooting spree. Many of the survivors also started showing symptoms of PTSD just like the kids. The parents had lost their kids, their family. Families have been broken because of what happened that day. They experienced something they never thought would happen to them. A lot of the parents at the school and even around the United States were scared for their school safety. A lot of parents wanted cameras, locks, and the kids to be protected. They wanted to drop their kid off at school and know that they will be able to see them
One of the main arguments used by non-believers against the existence of God is the presence of evil and suffering in the world. The term ‘evil’ is often used to describe something that is morally wrong. Philosophers make a distinction between moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil results from human actions that are morally reproachable, and Natural evil results from the malfunctioning of the natural world, which produces entities such as disease and famine.
The question of whether or not God exists has been asked by billions of people since the concept of religion emerged. Many people try to explain things such as hurricanes and tornadoes as “Acts of God” or even the existence of human beings and the world itself to be “created” by an almighty power. Others claim that the harm they inflict was demanded of them by their God. CS Lewis argues that through the comprehension of standards of good and bad, God’s existence is proven. However, Lewis’s defense for the existence of God is adequate because it fails to acknowledge the possibility for people to be good on their own, without the instruction of a supernatural entity.
Introduction The book of Romans Chapter 1-8 gives a great preliminary understanding of a biblical worldview. In the book of Romans, Paul letter addresses an understanding of what the natural world, human identity, human relationships and cultures are. Paul addresses four key components throughout the book of Romans. In the book of Romans Paul is a servant of Jesus Christ and an apostle that writes a letter to Christians to help them understand Christian’s faith and empirical implications for the lives of Christians.
If I was assigned to a new job in another nation, and that nation does not embrace the Biblical Worldview, there are several steps that I must take to prepare myself for that transition. For one, I would have to learn how to keep my faith in the Gospel, without offending the individuals that I work with. Personally, it would be hard for me to work and travel throughout a nation that does not embrace the Biblical Worldview. Therefore, I would look to spread the words of God in an appeasing manner. “Declare His glory among the nations, His wonders among all peoples” (Psalm 96:3). This scripture proves that God calls His true believers to spread His message to their brothers and sisters. For instance, when I was in the United States Army and I
Throughout the study of many religions, we are taught that individual actions have a great impact on the outcomes throughout your life. If you live an evil life, you will encounter difficultly and strive, while the good are often rewarded in many different ways. This basic belief becomes complicated when bad things happen to good people. Why do we lose good people to violence and terror? Why would the family that takes care of the homeless have their home destroyed by fire? It does not make sense that people doing good things would be led to suffering, yet we know it happens. The term Theodicy was developed by Gottfried Liebniz (Leibniz, 1985) as a way to “reconcile belied in a just, benevolent, and omnipotent God with the grim reality of suffering” (Simko, 2012). While this is a good term, we must look deeper to gain more understanding of the reasons behind bad things happening to good people.
Consider the idea that if God exists then objective moral values exist, we are then assuming that there are certain things that are right or wrong regardless of whether anyone can prove them to be so. Christian theists believe that God is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent and therefore it would make sense that moral values originated from him has he has a perfectly good nature and all actions should be measured against his own to make sure they are good. In general, everyone is held accountable for their actions, whether they are morally right or wrong, and usually evil actions will have consequences. Most people would agree, regardless of having a belief in God or not, that good trumps evil and that it is a better world to live in if people are following their morals.
The problem of evil is as ancient as humanity itself. Since the dawn of man, thinkers, philosophers, religionists and practically every human being who have suffered at the hands of evil have pondered this enigma, either as a logical-intellectual-philosophical or emotional-religious-existential problem. The preponderance of evil as a reality in human existence, and