Meg Greenfield In Defense Of The Animals Analysis

Animal testing is an extremely controversial topic because it deals with delicate matters and matters of humanity. Animal testing is intended to help consumers buy safe and healthy products, but they are torturing innocent animals by doing so. People that are in favor of animal testing usually are also advocates for medical research and progress, though there have been other proven methods of research. But they don’t think of it as tormenting and killing animals. On the other hand, a lot of people are compassionate about animals and think that testing on them is inhumane. These advocates of the animals think that an animal’s safety should be put

The idea of animal rights has been around for centuries. Even decades ago, people were taking action for the welfare of animals. Marc Bekoff and Ned Hettinger share this idea all the way back in 1994 when they said that there is evidence that scientist are concerned with animal welfare by acknowledge that they use the guidelines in place to protect animals during research, in order to have their work published (Bekoff 219). Guidelines are the basis for the moral and ethical treatment of animals. Each person may have his or her own standard, but having a standard among the entire population ensures the welfare of the animals. Unfortunately, these standards are not at a level to where the animals are being protected. Many animals in captivity are treated in ways that would shock the average person. Orcas for example, are starved until they do the desired task (Cowperthwaite). This form of operant condition can lead to success, but often leads to resentment and hostility towards the trainers.

There has also been studies that have proved animal activist are extreme sometimes. The President of (PETA) a known organization once told Vogue that, “If animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS we would be against it”. This is the same disease that affected 36.7 million people globally in the year of 2015. Animal testing is what scientist need to find cures for the human race and their diseases and without it we wouldn't be as evolved as we are now.

Animals are found throughout lives of humans. As companions, entertainment, test subjects and food, animals serve vital roles throughout our lives.The Animal Bill of Rights, through the Animal Legal Defense Fund, attempts to defend the basic legal rights of all animals. However, to weigh the need for such an act, one must compare the suffering of animals to the benefits such suffering gives to humankind. It’s much more important to highlight the crucial medical advances that lab animals have provided over the injustices they may suffer, but this suffering can not and should not be ignored. It is with measure that we do not enact a bill of rights for animals, however we bring new awareness of animal research and the ethical treatment of all

In “The Case for Animal Rights” written by Tom Regan, the author analyzes reasons for why all beings should have rights, but argues in particular why animals should have basic rights, like humans. “I regard myself as an advocate of animal rights- as a part of the animal rights movement”(Regan 337). The goals of the movement include the following: not allowing the use of animals in science, commercial agriculture, and the eradication of commercial and sport hunting or trapping. Regan blantly dismisses people who claim to believe in the rights of animals, but do not put forth these goals. He rejects the thought that using animals for cosmetic research is a violation of their rights and is unacceptable, but if it is cancer research then it is permissible. “You don’t change unjust institutions by tidying them up”(Regan 337) Regan goes on to break down his paper into views which he believes that people hold in regard to animal rights, he then counters these views with thought experiments that explain why suffering and pain are only feelings that add to the fundamentally wrong system that allows animals to be seen as resources. In this paper, I will discuss Regan’s arguments, possible objections to his arguments, and provide answers to those objections using the author's point of view.

The abuse of Animals is increasing around the world, for personal and recreational uses. Animals are used in ancient and modern medicine to cure different types of illnesses and diseases. Animals are also being used for testing different types of hygiene products; which leave many of them are left scarred for life, while others are left to die in a cage. Animal rights groups around the world are working around the clock trying to stop this abuse, groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). Are working around the clock to make sure such practices stop. This paper will demonstrate how modern liberals view animal rights, and how animals are viewed within society.

According to the “Universal Declaration of the Rights of Animals” written by the International League of the Rights of Animals in September of 1977 animals have similar right to those of humans. Animals have a right to live with respect and shall not be killed without reason. They shall not be denied the right to reproduce, or have the freedom of living in their natural habitat (Opposing Viewpoints 20). Activism in animal rights first began in the late 1960s because a documentary from Canada showed baby seals being beat to death with clubs was shown across the world. When people saw the documentary, they were outraged and started a massive animal-rights movement, which is now targeting factory farms (“Key Issue: Animal Rights” 1).

When discussing the issues faced from an ethical standpoint of animal rights it is important to consider the benefits animals bring to people and then question what rights animals are entitled to due to this (Fisher). Taking that into account, one must ask if giving them rights could possibly overstep on human rights and would animals even be able to enjoy rights (Fisher). It is often debated that the benefits and knowledge through experimentation of animals have led to life-saving advancements in the field of science and medicine (Fisher). The other side of the debate argues that even if these past benefits are justified, these type of experiments are no longer necessary and it is deemed unacceptable that wrongful treatment of animals is done for this purpose (Fisher). When it comes to the question of

Foremost, the animal’s rights were dishonored when they are used in experiments. Humans and animals are very similar in a lot of ways, such as both humans and animals think, they behave, experience pain and they have feelings too. Therefore, animals must remain preserved with the same admiration as us humans. Even though, the animal’s rights had been dishonored when they’re being used in examination because they can’t say no. The Animals are endangered because of the tests, the tests often cause permanent damage or even death. The animals never have the option if they want to do the experiment. Animals don’t just freely give up themselves for the development for new technology. The scientist makes the animals decision for them whether they like it or not. Their decisions are made for them because they cannot tell them what they do or don’t want to happen to them. When the scientist chooses the animals destiny in their experimental environments, the animal’s rights are taken away

“Misleading experiments and squandering precious money, time, and resources that could have been spent on humane-relevant research” (“Top 5 Reasons To Stop Animal Testing”). And it’s true we waste so much money on things that are so irrelevant and we kill an animal and the test fail anyway. Scientist should just find another way to test things and leave animals alone. “The world doesn’t need another eyeliner, hand soap, food ingredient, or shampoo” (“Top Five Reasons To Stop Animal Cruelty”). Animals should have rights and they shouldn’t be killed all the time. They shouldn’t have to suffer or live in fear. Animals should be free and live in their natural habitat and be left alone. They don’t have to be afraid of us. Animal testing is a waste of time and money. Animals should have as much rights as us humans. Why should an animal's life be worth less than us? I bet if you we all saw how they are actually tested and treated this animals we would feel different about this situation. We all need to see how they really test these animals and how they suffer just because of

Scientists inhumanely sabotage animal lives and coerce them to live in unbearable conditions in order to conduct “accurate” results that can be used on people. Additionally, corporations are becoming corrupt because they fear that they will lose money once consumers learn about the pernicious procedures that go behind making their products. Despite the necessity for treatments and products, animal rights activists have fought continuously to preserve animal independence by exposing research facilities and advocating protests that have urged many corporations to consider producing animal-cruelty free products. It is important that individuals acknowledge that scientists and researchers are harming and endangering animal species by conducting unjust and inhumane experiments on these innocent creatures. Therefore, limiting the ways scientists test on animals will not only protect animal rights, but it will enhance human companionship. Ending animal abuse in research will create an effective social, political, economic, and cultural advancement that will improve moral significance among humans.

Our treatment of animal can range from extreme pampering to horrible abuse. What we don’t see or don’t care about is that “1.6 million animals are involved around this, 700 cats are shot to model human-injuries to develop surgical techniques on pigs; And testing poison gases on rats and mice. Just in Britain for 2000 there were 2.71 million experimental procedures were carried out on animals. 500,000 of these animals were genetically modified (a 14% increase from 1999). In Australia 3 million animals were used in scientific research in 1998,” (Browning,50), these research programs are still going on today.

Imagine being experimented on daily, only to end up locked up in a cage with nothing and nobody. Envision being deprived, isolated and used over and over again. Animals go through these situations constantly with nothing but themselves. Scientist develop theories and statements, with the aid of animals, for a better understanding of life threatening diseases, when in reality their experiments keep animals secluded and distressed. When confronted with animal cruelty many people have mixed emotions of disgust and rage which eventually leads to combat for justice. Although experiments executed on animals may be useful for understanding life threatening diseases, it is brutal and can proceed to failure of the experiment, as well as deprivation and isolation of the organism.

The rights of animals has been an argumentative topic for centuries. As far back as the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Britain was shaped there has been long running rational discussions on the subject of animal rights. The principal social orders were framed to ensure and look after human treatment of work animals, for example, cattle, donkeys, and house hold pets. Towards the finish of the nineteenth century more associations were made, only this time to challenge the utilization of animals in experimentation. In the present society gatherings for example, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have proceeded with these conventional battles and also including new motivation. Animal testing is one of the many controversial topics that involves the rights of animals and has been disputed for centuries throughout the world. Experimentation on animals is inhumane and cruel and scientist should not be able to test cosmetics, and immunizations on poor, innocent animals. Many argue that substitute assets and strategies are accessible to researchers with the goal that testing on animals can be maintained a strategic distance from, and people and creatures are so extraordinary in their hereditary cosmetics that the outcomes taken from testing on creatures can be totally unique in relation to people. Performing experiments on animals is abusing defenseless animals. Researchers express that animal testing is the best way to watch and research a living

     More and more animals are being taken form their natural habitats and tested on every year. Researchers, scientists, and companies just trying to make new products are using animals to further their experiments. If animal testing continues to happen at this rate then their will be no animals left to use for food, study, or even for simple amusement. When the animals are being taken form their natural environments it harms the natural food chain and other ways of life. When people abusing the animal’s rights they make the animals suffer and decrease their overall population. Many people are trying to find ways to end this hurting of nature. Some people find