During the past couple months a controversial case was brought to the grand jury in Ferguson. The jury decided to not indict Officer Darren Wilson, who shot Michael Brown. This major decision caused uprising, riots, protests, and lootings in the town of Ferguson. Many protesters feel this is a race issue, when clearly it is not. The grand jury did the right thing to not indict Officer Darren Wilson in the killing of Michael Brown. Michael Brown was guilty because he assaulted a police officer, the actions Michael Brown took apart in, and The officer, Darren Wilson who shot Michael Brown proved that he was acting in the matter of self-defense. Michael Brown assaulted Officer Darren Wilson who never used his gun before this incident. Officer Darren Wilson, to protect his own life had to go to last resort and shoot Michael Brown. According to the article, “Michael Brown …show more content…
According to the article, “Views You Can Use: Was Justice Served in Ferguson?” Rachel Brody proclaims, “The jury, composed of nine whites and three blacks, found no probable cause to charge Wilson, who is white, and returned a “no true bill” on all five indictments against him for killing an unarmed black teen.” But one important fact that is consistently left out is that the grand jury that decided to not indict the officer has been sitting there for a while. They were given this case and were not chosen to handle this case but were just sitting on the stand when the case arrived. According to the article, “Views You Can Use: Was Justice Served in Ferguson?” Rachel Brody proclaims, “Were 12 shots necessary? Was there some other, non-lethal way to subdue the suspect?” When a man approaches you with his hands near his waist, looking like he may have a concealed weapon, wouldn’t you be afraid too? You would be forced to take any actions to protect yourself, no matter how lethal they may
In the Ferguson, Missouri case involving a white police officer (Darren Wilson) shooting an unarmed African American teenager (Michael Brown), the worldwide media immediately claimed that the officer shot Michael Brown for no reason besides the color of his skin. Many rumors and assumptions spread like wildfire after white police officer Darren Wilson was found innocent by a judge of having purpose to shoot Brown.
Racial injustice against people of colour is an immense, ongoing issue that has not only targeted lives but has also taken many innocent lives. In America, these racial divisions date back to the days of slavery, where black people were denied of their basic human rights because of discrimination. In present day, some individuals view America as a post-racial environment, due to such victories as electing a black president; but the brutal, fatal and unjust events in Ferguson, Missouri prove that these divisions are still present. On August 9th, 2014, an unarmed, 18 year old black teen was shot and killed by Darren Wilson, a white police officer. The events that led to the death of Michael Brown occurred on an early morning where Mr. Wilson stopped Michael Brown and a friend after leaving a convenience store. An altercation occurred which prompted Mr. Brown to flee and officer Wilson to begin shooting. The death of Mr. Brown caused the city to stand up against police brutality through peaceful protest, looting, and even violence, to gain justice for Mr. Brown and his family. As the protests grew, the police used military tactics such as, tear gas, to “maintain order” during the unrest of the city. In recent, news the grand jury decided that Officer Darren Wilson was not responsible for the death of Michael Brown, which led to a larger public outrage not only in America, but also across the
After Michael Brown was killed by Darren Wilson the tension blew up into a riot. The events received considerable attention in the U.S. and elsewhere, attracted protesters from outside the region, and generated a vigorous debate about the relationship between law enforcement and African Americans as well as created a national dialogue about police use of force doctrine in Missouri and nationwide. The court case that followed the shooting was led by Robert McCulloch in a highly unusual process. Instead of conducting an investigation and gathering information the prosecutor, Robert McCulloch left jurors to wade through mass amounts of information to determine the outcome. (Placeholder cite) His office left no recommendation as to whether or not Darren Wilson should be indicted or not. The unfair treatment discussed just is not in this one area there are hundreds of these communities being treated just as unfair as the Ferguson community. Those communities should band together and protest for a change so everybody in the United States can be treated equally. All of these issues matter and are very important. People in our country no matter what race, religion, or sexuality should be treated as equals. Everybody should protest together for a change, a change for everybody to have the same rights as the common white man. This is an issue everybody in our
The grand jury's decision not to prosecute syndicated police officers in the Michael Brown and Eric Garner cases has placed the process under intense public scrutiny. However, according to the United States system, both grand juries had
Michael brown died 150 feet away from the car even though it was said he died only 35 feet away from the car. There was signs that there was a fight between Michael Brown and officer Wilson. Now given those facts I still would have to agree with officer Wilson because it was reported that Michael Brown was suspected of robbing a store not far from that apartment complex. The police have a video of a man that matches the description of Michael Brown reaching over the counter and grabbing cigarettes then when he tries to leave the store manager that was 2 feet smaller than him try to stop the theft but was easily pushed around and unable to do anything to stop
The shooting of African American teenager Michael Brown by white officer Darren Wilson has been a hot topic of debate. Those in support of Michael Brown believe that Darren Wilson racially profiled Brown and that the shooting would have never occurred had Brown been white. Those in support of Darren Wilson state that he acted in self-defense. This argument has more evidence supporting it than the argument that Brown was racially profiled.
On August 9, 2014 Michael Brown, an 18 year old black man was shot and killed by Darren Wilson, a 28 year old white man on the Ferguson Missouri Police Force. Before the altercation Brown robbed a convenience store where he stole several packages of cigarillos and shoved the store clerk to the ground when the clerk tried stopping him from leaving. The police were called and nearby Officer Darren Wilson caught up with Brown which led into an altercation between the two which began for the control of Wilson’s gun. During the altercation the gun was fired and Brown ran, with Wilson in hot pursuit behind him. When Brown stopped running he turned and faced Wilson and started moving closer to Wilson. Wilson then pulled the trigger and shot Brown
Here 're my main views and points on the Michael Brown shooting. I would like to start off by saying, As could be predicted, the demonization of Mike Brown has begun. You see, he stole some cigars. Therefore he deserved to be shot in the back. The fact that the Ferguson cop Darren Wilson was the shooter was almost an afterthought in this press conference. The main was to say that Brown stole cigars before the shooting and that Wilson was apparently on the lookout for him. What also should have communicated to police from the 911 dispatches, however, was that the cigar store robbery was not an armed robbery, Wilson, who ultimately found and killed Brown, should have known even if he was apprehending Brown he was unarmed when he shot Brown, according to the witnesses accounts. Brown’s empty hands were in the air when he was fatally shot.
In 2014, the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson Missouri sparked an outbreak of protests and negative attention against the nation 's law enforcement. Michael Brown was shot and killed and the whereabouts of what actually happened were very unclear. Was it an accident? Was it intentional? Did Michael Brown give a big enough reason to be shot at or was the cop abusing of his power? So many questions were asked and many of them were left unanswered. There was not enough evidence to figure out what happened. Many witnesses thought that it was a race issue and that the officer, Officer Darren Wilson, had no reason to kill Michael. The grand jury declared Darren Wilson not guilty for the murder of Michael Brown (Buchanan 2015). After the tragedy occurred and the news of the officers’ liberty spread, the “war” against officers had begun (Kaste 2015). 51 officers were killed nationwide all in 2014, a huge increase from the 27 killed in 2013 (Kaste 2015). People from all over the country were becoming terrified of the nation’s patrolmen. The fight between police officers and the community is becoming a serious issue. Cops are being blamed for unjust behavior against innocent people and nothing can be done to prove that what the officer did, was for a good reason. It is a “he said/she said” controversy when trying to figure out who 's right. Incidents involving police force and citizen misconduct were
On August 9, of last year, an unarmed black man named Michael Brown was shot down by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. Later that year a grand jury declared the officer “not guilty.” The decision outrage the Ferguson community so much that people turn to riots and looting for they amusement. The findings of the grand jury suggested that Brown was the aggressor in his encounter with Wilson and that the officer acted in self-defense. Yet, if you ask what Michael Brown may have done wrong in this situation, many will say that you are blaming the victim (Loury). This is unacceptable. We are showing a terrible example for our black youth from taking advantage of this man death by
A subject that recently has caught the attention of many around the world is Policing and all that comes with it. There are countless people with opinions for either side of the argument. One case in particular that has drawn a lot of controversy is the case of 18 year old Michael Brown. He was killed August 9, 2014, in Ferguson, Missouri, a northern Suburb of St. Louis. Brown, an 18-year-old black man, was fatally shot by Darren Wilson, 28, a white Ferguson police officer. Before the incident with Darren Wilson Michael Brown was seen with Dorian Johnson at a convenience store taking multiple packages of cigarillos. Wilson had been notified by police dispatch of the robbery and descriptions of the two suspects. He encountered Brown and Johnson as they were walking down
Michael Browns case has provoked peaceful protests in Ferguson, Missouri where the incident happened. Which have resulted in even more police brutality.
I agree with your post in how Officer Wilson exceed in using the amount of force against Brown. But how I explain what I believed on situation that it is a very complex and controversies on this case, referring to the many statements from the witnesses in how they say that brown did not try to harm the officer and that he just was holding his hands up, but the Supreme Court justified that Wilson did not break the law, so the question is what really happen?
Michael Brown and Dorian Johnson leave Ferguson Market and Liquor. Surveillance videoshows Mr. Brown stealing some cigarillos. They walk along West Florissant Avenue and then inthe middle of the street on Canfield Drive. Officer Darren Wilson arrives, alone in his policevehicle. Speaking through his window, he tells the two men to move to the sidewalk. He seesthat Mr. Brown fits the description of a suspect in a convenience store theft. Officer Wilsonmakes a call to the dispatcher about the two men. He positions his S.U.V. to block the two menas well as traffic. There is an altercation between Officer Wilson and Mr. Brown, who isstanding at the window of the vehicle. Officer Wilson fires two shots from inside the vehicle, onelikely grazing Mr. Brown’s thumb, and the other missing him. Mr. Brown runs east. OfficerWilson pursues him on foot. Mr. Brown stops and turns toward Officer Wilson, who also stops.Mr. Brown moves toward Officer Wilson, who fires several more shots. Mr. Brown is fatallywounded. Several witnesses reported seeing an altercation in the S.U.V. between Officer Wilsonand Mr. Brown. Some said Mr. Brown punched Officer Wilson while Mr. Brown was partlyinside the vehicle. At least one witness said no part of Mr. Brown was ever inside the vehicle. Inhis own testimony, Officer Wilson said that Mr. Brown reached into the vehicle and fought forhis gun. Examiners found Mr. Brown’s blood or other DNA outside the driver’s door, outside theleft rear passenger door,
Even the chief couldn’t explain this. Why would Brown attack the police officer for no reason and then run away, why would the officer shoot up to 11 times if it was only self-defense, a simple wound would have worked just fine yet the officer felt the need to recklessly shoot numerous times. Crenshaw, who was watching from a nearby balcony, says “The officer actually shot kind of carelessly. They shot my neighbors building that was on the opposite side of the police car. They then later came and removed the bullet… anybody could have been standing right there.” His actions were careless and inconsiderate to the consequences. All of the witnesses’ stories add up, Crenshaw, Johnson, and Mitchell all say that the young man was surrendering and the officer was not being careful or thinking about where the bullets could end up. So if Brown was attacking the anonymous police officer why was Brown so far away, why did he get shot so many times, and why was every single casing that was found at the scene from the officers weapon. Brown was unarmed, and had no reason to be motivated to harm the armed officer. The entire story is