Command Relationships Command relationships delineate authority, responsibility, and accountability for force protection and execution of the collective mission, defining command relations, and understanding the four types of command relationships are essential to effective communications and mission execution. To understand command relationships one must first understand the organizational structure of the Armed Forces Leadership and key terms that communicate authority and the relationships derived from the structured authority. In a post Katrina analysis a breakdown of command relationships revealed the need for centralized decision-making authority, and an understanding of the military role in domestic emergencies. In hind sight it …show more content…
In an analysis of the situation in the aftermath of Katrina, there is a clear delineation of authority, with the National Guard of individual states remaining under state executive control of the Governor when not federalized (Tkacz, 2006). Understanding the progression of the levels of command is paramount to understanding command interactions and how command elements are unified under one Senior Military Officer forming specific operational command relationships.
Command Relationships
Command relationships preserve the preeminence of civil authorities in their domains of obligation while enabling the full utilization of military forces as permitted by the United States Constitution, Congressional law, and Presidential directives (Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2013). All United States military forces within respective branches operate under a single commander establishing a successive authority structure. Army command relationships define superior and subordinate relationships between unit commanders. By stipulating a chain of command, command relationships amalgamates effort and enable commanders to use subordinate forces with extreme flexibility. Army command relationships classify the level of control exerted on subordinate organizations (U.S. Department of the Army, 2014).
The type of command relationship is designated by the estimated duration of
Mission Command is the framework used by the U.S. Army to ensure key leaders receive clear direction from commanders. Clear commander’s guidance allows subordinates to make disciplined and informed decisions to best accomplish assigned tasks. Ideally, application of mission command principles ensures all elements integrate and sync actions, thus creating a shared understanding and purpose. Analysis of Major General (MG) William Garrison’s decision making during the Battle of Mogadishu demonstrates how mission command principles must be applied to gain and maintain a position of advantage during military ground operations. As commander of Task Force Ranger (TFR), MG Garrison demonstrated both successful and failed application of mission command principles. Four principles will be discussed in the
Every single soldier has a role in the Army. Hierarchy is the Army’s capstone. These way lower level commanders like company commanders, platoon commander, platoon sergeants are in charge to develop the Direct Leadership. Direct Leaders use the face-to-face contact with those under their orders. They are responsible for develop the basic skills in
"Leadership is the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish the mission and improve the organization" (Mills, 2013). The Army measures its leaders by their attributes and their core leader competencies. Also, a leader must be able to train, coach and mentor their subordinates. Additionally, the Army has three levels of leadership: Direct, Organizational, and Strategic. An effective leader understands and practices these qualities at an operational level.
IF you have a problem or you want to attempt to get paperwork or have something done. You must first Go to your first line Supervisor, Which is normally your Team leader, but in some cases it may end up being your Squad Leader. But from your First line supervisor, it goes on up to the Squad leader, then Platoon Sergeant or Platoon Leader (again, all depends on your platoons’ structure). From there it works it way up to the Company First Sergeant, then Company Commander, From there it continues up the chain of command, to your Battalion Command Sergeant Major, Battalion Commander. Then to the respective Brigade CSM and Commander, up to Division, and so on. Until it hit the top and the Commander in chief, The President of the United
Transitioning to command from any other leadership challenge in the military requires that an officer experiences a mental shift in his/her approach to exercising the newly granted authority, responsibility and accountability for the unit. Army doctrine suggests that authority, responsibility, and accountability are inherent attributes of command. These attributes of command coupled with the expectations of the commander, demand a new and holistic approach to commandership, which is defined as exercising the art of command through leadership, management, and command.
“Chain of command, also referred to as a scalar principle, is an organization mechanism that establishes formal lines of communication within a police department” (Cordner, 2016, p.116). I am sure that we all have heard the term chain of command, but what does this exactly means. I am not a police officer, however, I am a security officers. One thing in this industry that I’ve learned is that if I have any concerns that needs to be addressed the my first contact will be the Sergeant. “The chain of command is establishes a direct path between every person in the department and the chief”(Cordner, 2016,p. 116). The Sergeant in my department is the first line supervisor to contact. In other cases the Chain of Command is useful for when there are some orders that are given that only a particular supervisor is needed, you will
Operation Verbal Image is an exercise based on command and control. It used many leaders who used command and control to accomplish their assigned mission. This command and control shaped the battlefield and took the fight to the enemy. This paper will discuss, how important command and control is, what is command and control, what does command and control do, and command and control in the information age. This paper will also discuss how command and control was used, how it affected the outcome of the battle, and my personnel opinions on how command and control could have been done differently.
In August 2005, Hurricane Katrina left a path of destruction down the coastline of the Gulf of Mexico. It was the worst natural disaster that the United States had encountered up to that point. Even with warning signs before the storm hit, local and state governments failed to adhere to the warnings. Katrina’s worst devastation came in New Orleans where thousands lost everything due to massive flooding. New Orleans was in desperate need of assistance. Unfortunately, due to difficult circumstances at every level of government, the relief would have to wait. “Breakdowns in communication and confused emergency and law enforcement responses from local, state, and federal officials in the hours and days after Hurricane Katrina led to chaos and panic in the affected areas, endangering citizens’ property and lives.” (Tkacz, 2006, p. 1) Command Relationships were a complete failure in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina due to the absence of Command and Control, training for that type of situation, and the lack of resources.
The Joint Force Commander (JFC) utilizes command and control to exercise authority over assigned and attached forces within his or her command. Command provides direction and motivation to individuals and units, whereas control is the task of managing forces and the associated tasks required to accomplish the mission. Effective command and control successfully balances the art of command with the science of control and strengthens the commander’s ability to make and execute decisions. Mission command advances command and control
Address, in-depth, how one of the crises in the text have influenced the U.S. emergency response programs and/or mutual aid agreements. The April of 2007 Virginia Tech shooting highlighted “the need for many diverse organizations to have a common incident command structure as a framework for an organized response” (Miller & Rivera, pg. 11); more specifically, the situation called for a unified command in order to better manage the incident. A unified command is created when the incident commander from each agency involved in the incident join together to provide one authoritative incident command body. According to the Virginia Tech Review Panel Report: Mass Shootings at Virginia Tech, “a unified command structure could have led to less confusion,
This paper provides an evaluation of the command and control and integration of joint functions associated with the invasion of Sicily, known as Operation HUSKY. The Allies achieved a positive outcome despite the fact that key leaders demonstrated ineffective command and control capabilities and poor integration. The paper will first evaluate the joint function of command and control, using the three attributes of mission command from joint doctrine: commander’s intent, mutual trust, and understanding. An evaluation of the integration of intelligence and fires joint functions at the Operational level will follow.
This thesis will cover the Support of the Commander’s Leadership Philosophy, command climate, strategies, and the role of the gunnery sergeant’s importance in the execution of the Commander’s leadership philosophy for Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 214, Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia. We feel that the command climate at this unit is good. The three strategies that we will use to discuss this will be communication, training and leadership and how important they are in order to establish an effective and productive environment. We will also discuss how the gunnery sergeant’s important role is the key to ensuring that these strategies are
Chain of command can be defined as a line of authority that extends from the top level of the organization to its lowest level. Chain of demand clearly defines that who is accountable to whom and what tasks are to be performed by all the employees. In addition to that, it also clarifies that who should be contacted when any critical situation or problem occurs. Managers usually use the chain of command while assigning jobs to the employees as it helps the employees in understanding who should they report to and who should they contact in case of a problem. There are three basic components of the chain of command (Mahida). The components are listed below:
In retrospect, the case of Katrina embodied both a negative and positive reflection of organizational dynamics. On the negative end, the city lacked a governmental political model to work with. This absence of unity in authority was perhaps due to void communication and the overwhelming scope of Hurricane Katrina for the city to handle. The involvement of several agencies with varying organizational dynamics also contributed to the chaotic environment of New Orleans. On the positive end however, a separate but unified command was established to achieve a common objective; search and rescue and bringing the city back in order.
Command structure is the organizational hierarchy through which administrative leadership or operational authority is exercised (DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, 2017). The United States’ armed forces and other coalition forces encountered an estimated 1,000 enemy troops and killed hundreds during Operation Anaconda. However, defeating these enemy forces required commanders and staff members to scramble to coordinate and rush reinforcements into battle after the shooting begun. The Combined Joint Task Force (CJTF) Mountain headquarters failure to establish and maintain tactical control, operational control, or situational awareness (SA) of special operations forces and other inter-agencies led to unity of command confusion during the execution of Operation Anaconda.