Milper Message 12-309

In 2013, the Army’s promotion process for Warrant Officers selected for Chief Warrant Officer Three were very easy. There was a basic list of accomplishments that needed to be met and the promotion was all but guaranteed. Now that the Army is in a drawdown stage, the promotion requirements have changed with regards of promoting Chief Warrant Officer Two’s to the rank of Chief Warrant Officer Three. Now in 2015, there has been additional requirements such as diverse positions, Professional Military Education (PME), Civilian Educational Degree’s required, duty performance to include soldier task and requirements and even strict evaluation requirements. With these changes, it is allowing a lot less to be promoted as well as putting some into the category of two time pass over’s and having to retire from the military. This process is helpful for those who entered the military during the surge and have less than stellar records, however makes it challenging for those who are in duty positions where they cannot complete the necessary requirements for the advancement of this new promotion

Contents—Continued Section II Principles and Standards, page 3 The principle of support • 1–8, page 3 Wartime standards of service • 1–9, page 3 Standards of service • 1–10, page 3 Section III Policy, page 3 Categories of flags • 1–11, page 3 Circumstances requiring a non-transferable flag • 1–12, page 4 Circumstances requiring a transferable flag • 1–13, page 4 Actions prohibited by a flag • 1–14, page 5 Processing exceptions • 1–15, page 5 Retaining soldiers past their ETS/ESA/MRD • 1–16, page 5 Chapter 2 Operating Tasks, page 6 Section I Task: Initiate the Flag, page 6 Rules for initiating the flag • 2–1, page 6 Steps

Selected out of 6 personnel to serve a special Active Duty Special Works (ADSW) tour with Personnel Administration office at MG (Major General) level command to United States Army Reserve (USAR). SPC Santa assisted with expediting the mobilization of 1400+ personnel and assisted with personnel actions in Orlando, Florida, as most of her unit was deployed to Kuwait. She also worked as a military technician by providing administrative support for programs of the unit in training, mobilization, personnel, retention, and served as the coordinator for the administration of unit and individual

1. The enclosed recommendation for award (DA Form 638) for Lieutenant Colonel Hector Cuellar, Jr. is being submitted less than the required timeframe for the proposed presentation date. LTC Cuellar was an AGR officer who incurred serious medical concerns which qualified his assignment to the Warrior Transition Command. However, during the process the medical board found unfit to continue his service and processed him out of the Army Reserves.

9. all soldiers in the unit will receive annual dental examinations. the unit (or its supporting personnel activity) will-establish procedures to deal with soldiers who are classified as which of the following ?

The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to honorable. The applicant seeks, relief contending, in effect, he is requesting an upgrade of his discharge in order to have an opportunity to reenlist and properly satisfy his duties as a citizen. The applicant contends that his discharge was based on an incident which occurred within a two months span without consideration of the hardships and neglects within his platoon. The applicant further contends that it is evidence that his wrongdoings were due to a lack of maturity and moral character as a young man and he did not fully grasp consequences of his actions. The applicant contends that he was not engaged in criminal activity but notwithstanding

a. Staff sergeant or above must possess the grade equal to or one grade below the grade

The purpose of this memorandum is to recommend SGT Horton, John for promotion from SGT to SSG.

1. I am requesting a STAB on my behalf based on an annual or change of rater NCOER that was processed by the custodian of records in time to be filed before the date the board convened was not reviewed .NCOER, s received on time but returned for administrative reasons may warrant standby considerations according CH 7 Para 7-49 (h)-(8). I believe that this current board would have favored me in the board results for FY 15. The packet enclosed was reviewed by the S-1 and meets all requirements

2. The previous NCOER NCOIC departed unexpectedly two months ago due to a compassionate reassignement, and he was out the majority of the previous sixty days prior to his departure due to medical and personal issues. As such, the corrections the battalion CSM required on the NCOERs were not done and the NCOERs were not processed in a timely fashion.

The applicant requests an upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for his discharge. The applicant states, in effect, he has submitted two requests to have his discharge upgraded. The applicant contends, unfortunately, his requests were denied on both occasions. The applicant further contends, he has been receiving disability compensation for multiple disabilities. The applicant states, he has an anxiety disorder that is associated with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The applicant further states that on September 3, 2014, the Secretary of Defense issued a memorandum to the Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Record (BCM/NR). To carefully consider each and

SPC White's corrected APFT score has been updated to her ERB. On the 25 APR her incorrect APFT card posted on her PPW in result her promotion status dropped . Every month Soldier's points are pulled on the 8th from HRC, which gives the system enough time to receive her correct APFT score. I will reintegrate SPC White when her correct APFT score posts to her PPW (24-48 hours). Keep in mind as we have looked into APFT cards we have noticed some Soldiers that are doing alternate events they're APFT cards are incorrectly added, please review and resend to S-1 to correct this issue.

The Army Career Tracker Program SSG Matthew D. Ellis Fort Rucker NCOA SLC class 18-003 Abstract This paper discusses the need for creating the Army Career Tracker (ACT). The ACT revamps the way the old Noncommissioned Officer Development system worked on career progression of Soldiers all the way up the rank structure. From the establishment of the program through the feedback from testing, it then moved to the implementation phase.

Imagine you are a detailer and you receive notification that a critical mission will go gapped because a Sailor did not submit their Operational Screening. Senior Enlisted Leaders are should know the importance of completing and reporting the results of Operational Screening in a timely matter. This essay will cover a brief background of the Overseas Contingency Operation Support Assignment (OSA), discuss a problem within the program and give recommendations for decreasing delays in Operation Screening reporting and unexpected mission drops.

c. Once Soldiers are recommended for promotion by the unit commander each will have to go before the board. The board will use a question