It is the situation of moral dilemma and it covers the issue of the primacy of public interest, honesty, competence and professionalism (which are a part of ACS code of ethics) Nirmal clearly sees that the offer made by company A is better for his organization. To his surprise he realizes that 2ndcompany in the competition is run by his friend Devraj. Adding fuel to the situation he also receives a phone call from Devraj urging him to favor his offer. Nirmal is totally pressed between his profession and his friendship with Devraj. Who are the interested parties? What are their relationships? The government department of which Nirmal is a senior employee and Company B (which is run by Devraj) are the interested parties in this case. The government department has decided to acquire an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. Nirmal is in charge of the selection process. He has …show more content…
I believe Nirmal should ask the exact same question to himself. If he thinks by going against the will of his friend is better for him, the organization he is working and the people around him than he should stick to his decision. Nobody should be given the unfair advantage (this is the policy of free market) and everyone should be treated equally. If I were in the similar circumstances, I would follow the similar path as Nirmal did to solve this situation of conflict of interest by giving the preference to the Company A in selection process as it is the deserving one. References: Anon (2014). "ACS Code of Professional Conduct", Australian Computer Society. Accessed 24th of October 2014, http://www.acs.org.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/4901/Code-of-Professional-Conduct_v2.1.pdf Consumer Law. 2014. The Australian Consumer Law. Accessed 25th of October2014, http://www.consumerlaw.gov.au/content/content.aspx?doc=the_acl/legislation.htm. MacDonald, C. (2010). "A Guide to Moral Decision Making". Accessed on 22nd October 2014,
I feel it is a person’s choice and it is different than suicide. It has to be well thought out and talked about with a team of people involved including physicians, psychologists, and family. I also think it is based more on
People from all walks of life face many ethical dilemmas. These dilemmas have consequences. Our worldview determines how we deal with these dilemmas, and guides us to the right decisions. In this essay, I will examine an ethical issues through my Christian worldview. I will also present other viewpoints, and compare them to mine.
Ethical dilemmas occur when there is a disagreement about a situation and all parties involved question how they should behave based on their individual ethical morals. (Newman & Pollnitz, 2005). The dilemma that I will be addressing in this essay involves Michael, recently employed male educator working in the nursery, and parents of a baby enrolled at the centre. The parents have raised concerns about male educators changing their child’s nappy as they have cultural practices that do not allow this practice to take place. This situation is classed as an ethical dilemma as there is a dispute between cultural beliefs and legal requirements within the workplace. There are four parties involved (parents, child, educator and director), all
Q.1 – Briefly describe the dilemma presented in this case study. Who are the key players and what are some of the antecedents that have led to the present problem? Ans. When the best manager, takes certain actions which go against the core values of the company, it becomes really difficult for the management to make a fair judgement. They are stuck in a dilemma of what would be a better judgement. As a leader, it is very important to be fair and impartial to your team members. And so is the dilemma presented in the case, Bob’s Meltdown, Nicholas G. Carr. The key players in this case are1. Annette Innella 2. Robert Dunn 3. Jay Nguyen Annette Innella is the Vice President, Knowledge Management at Concord Machines. She was recently hired by
The case gives an overview of NH operations in Bangalore, India. Why is the original NH model relevant and successful in India?
Nurses are faced with ethical dilemmas every day. There are a lot of different beliefs surrounding ethics and the code of ethics. Ethics and ethical issues have always existed, that is why they have put in place the code of ethics. The American Nursing Association (ANA) Code of Ethics isa guideline to help nurses determine which course of action to pursue. Every minute many ethical decisions are made, some may not comply with guidelines and others the patient’s will never understand. In this case study the nurse is put in an uncomfortable position and has two find a way to comply with the family, the patient, and the doctor’s orders.How can she report to the doctor the information the daughter has told her? How she approached
In journalism, an ethical dilemma is a complex issue or situation that often involves an emotional and psychological conflict between moral obligations and duties, in which to obey one would transgress the other. Within the media there are many stories that can be deemed an ethical dilemma; some more so than others. One of the most recent and prominent ethical dilemmas was the worldwide coverage surrounding the shooting of two American WBDJ journalists, Alison Parker and Adam Ward. Despite the fact that the shooter filmed the ordeal clearly showing the two slain journalists being shot, news outlets had picked it up and ran with the story, which ultimately went viral in minutes. This essay will analyse and thoroughly examine the reporting
Also I have confidence whether Nirmal acknowledges the individuals for as much homeland, he should think about competency most importantly what more a chance to be impartial is.
Milton Manufacturing Company is a closely-held company has been in business since 1999 when its President Irv Milton first opened the business with its primary operations in Long Island City, New York and factory branches and warehouses in surrounding areas. The business had increased revenue over its first ten years of business from $500,000 in its first year to $5 million in 2008.
As the result of this issue, Mebel, Doran & Company gains nothing but lose their reputation. Not only current client like Know corporation is losing confident on company, but other firms that using their service on M&A deal are also losing trust as well. However, Company should take action on people involve in this issue.
An ethical dilemma is an incident that causes us to question how we should react based on our beliefs. A decision needs to be made between right and wrong. I have experienced many ethical dilemmas in my lifetime, so I know that there is no such thing as an ethical dilemma that only affects one person. I also know that some ethical dilemmas are easier to resolve than others are. The easy ones are the ones in which we can make decisions on the spot. For example, if a cashier gives me too much change, I can immediately make a decision to either return the money or keep it. Based on Kant’s, categorical imperative there are two criteria for determining moral right and wrong. First, there is universalizability, which states, “the person’s
Last but not least, Vicky must consider the duty to the future employees of the company. If the key personnel of the other firms accept the generous but wicked offer from K.I., then it is clear they are absolutely unaware of the potential consequences of their decision. Vicky has to make sure that the new employees know what the future might hold for
The ethical dilemma is a situation by which it’s difficult to determine whether a situation is can be handled without disappointing both sides. Therefore, an ethical dilemma exists when the right thing to do is clear or when members of the healthcare team cannot agree on the right thing to do. Ethical dilemmas require negotiation of different points of view (potter, Perry, Stockert, & Hall 2011pg 78).
RCom and Ericsson legal advisors differ on the quantum of contribution the previous owed to the last mentioned. Chennai Network, spoke to by senior advice R Kadam, said a meeting of the considerable number of loan bosses was not called and "they have to know the effect of the merger before accepting the call".
Everyday we are tested as individuals to make the right choice. How we view ourselves as individuals and how others view us are directly correlated to our moral decision-making. But morals are somewhat misleading. What might be a wrong decision for one person might be a solution to another. So how do we define morals? Do we follow Gods’ moral rules because to do so would increase out likelihood of obtaining salvation in the afterlife? Or is it simpler than that. Is God going to deny our entrance into heaven because we have run a stop sign here and there? No. I believe our moral values are much simpler than that. I believe that our moral decision-making comes from our upbringing of what is right or wrong. Our parents and