preview

Most Dangerous Game Vs. High Noon

Decent Essays

High Noon is the story of a man who has a lot of pointless fragile masculinity, named Will Kane. It's also about a man who is being hunted by a sociopath named Frank Miller, who is also Will Kane. The Most Dangerous Game is a story about a game nobody wants to play, and it's similar in the sense that Rainsford is being hunted, except he is being hunted much more literally, by a sociopath named Zaroff. Both men use their wits to survive the situation they are in. They are both narratives full of action and fun themes about the fallacies of human nature. The Most Dangerous Game and High Noon both present plots that could be both similar and very different when they are placed together. Both protagonists are trapped in their way of being hunted …show more content…

The Most Dangerous Game never hesitated to state it up straight, both by the protagonist and the antagonist, which really goes to show how strongly it prevails in the story. "The world is made up of two classes, the hunters and the huntees." Rainsford didn't seem to have any reservations about this statement, however it does appear to be given the chance to change later on in the story. "Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if needs be, taken by the strong." Zaroff rewords Rainsford's sentiments, however Rainsford disagrees on the grounds that he applies it to human lives. The point is you could show this story to your friends and watch as they either question the value of human life or the strength of who we consider the hunters in our world. The values of High Noon could be boiled down to fragile masculinity and pride, but we could give it the benefit of the doubt. Throughout the story Will Kane is constantly left for dead by the people he considered his friends, because they're all flaky bastards. When Kane states that he could get help from the people in town, even the previous deputy says it will not be so. "I think my intuition tells me otherwise." And he is right in the end. Even the church-goers refuse to help. "I think you ought to go while there's still time." And you see how many people Kane asks. If they had all agreed, Kane wouldn't have had so much trouble with Frank Miller. The main moral, if anyone cares to look deeper than need be by an average audience, is that when you really need help, people will tell you to screw yourself. I think all audiences can agree on the positivity of these themes, though they do present themselves very

Get Access