Most Essential Idea About Closeness

In the article “Close Relationships Sometimes Mask Poor Communication” reachers discuess how often times being close with someone, can have a negative impact on our communications skills with those we care for the most. According to the atricical often times we expect the person we are close to understand what we want or need without actually explaining it to them. The aritical supplied several examples in which I am personally guilty of. One example was when a wife made a statement about it getting hot in the room, she was impling that she wanted the air condiniter tempture adjusted, while her husband mistook the statement in a more sexual way.

Thesis: The relationship made with people in life helps one stay in reality and keeps one grounded in morals. If one completely blocks out society and get lost in their imagination it can progress into an unhealthy alternate reality. Without the support of friends and family one can dwell in an irrational state of mind.

In A. L. Evangelista & D. Perlman, Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ISBN 0-521-82617-9

Throughout our lives, everyone that we share bonds with and interact with on a regular basis, either forms or has some sort of influence on our identity. Consequently, the majority of us naturally find ourselves striving to fit in with these people, especially during the tough transition from childhood to adulthood. It is this part of the human condition that makes us feel as though we must forge ties with something outside of ourselves in order to establish a strong sense of existence and a clear understanding of who we are. Although most individuals are able to make these connections with others naturally, others who stray from the social norm might not be so fortunate, but rather than

The three prototypes explored are avoidant, anxious-ambivalent, and secure attachments which describes how partners will behave in close relationships and how caring and supportive each individual is within their relationship. Avoidant attached individuals are withdrawn from relationships and untrustworthy of others. Anxious-Ambivalent individuals worry often about their partner’s needs being fulfilled as well as theirs and analyze if they’re moving too fast in the relationship when compared to their partner. Secured individuals are completely trustworthy of their partner and confident in their feelings and

Baxter and Rawlins (1988) say that there are three dialectical forces that must be in balance for the relationship to be successful (Trenholm, 2014). The dialectical forces are called expressive-protective, autonomy-togetherness, and the novelty-predictability dialectics (Trenholm, 2014). Expressive-protective dialectic involves a balance to share personal information and the need to have a little privacy (Trenholm, 2014). Autonomy-togetherness dialectic describes how interdependent they want to be with each other (Trenholm, 2014). There needs to have a balance of togetherness and being apart from each other (Trenholm, 2014). Novelty-predictability dialectic is how individuals interact with each other and how they fall into patterns of behavior (Trenholm, 2014). After a time these behaviors become predictable and they spend most of their time repeating old routines (Trenholm, 2014). This behavior can positive or it can be negative (Trenholm, 2014).

Relationship is often considered private matter limited to the individuals directly involved in the development, but the contextual dialectical view concerns the "tensions between public and private and between the ideal and real". (Morgan & Olsen, 2012, p. 138) Olsen and Morgan identified this tension as external matter according to the modern day American culture. Modern day social norm considers the expression and the exposer of private matter of the relationship, largely through social media, as the proof of the relational

Intimate distance (0-18 inches) is the nearest space around our body, it is reserved for an intimate person like family members, kids, partner in a relationship, etc. This space often come with tender feelings between two people, because it referred to the feels like love or completely conversely – to fight with someone and be aggressive. In some cases, people accept the presence of another person in his/her intimate distance, but on the other hand they can feel uncomfortable and overwhelmed. The first example is meeting with friends. This relationship is close, we are feeling comfortable and relaxed, accompanied by well know person. Eye contact is always keeping, we are still looking at the eyes of our partner and that means there are sympathy and intimacy. The topics of the conversation between this person are private like our emotions, situations from daily routine, problems, weakness, etc. They trust each other so the dialogue are outspoken. We must not lack the touch, which is one of the determinant of the intimate distance. People who keep close can hug, caress or kiss, this is the signal they strongly like

My primarily focus would be the invasion of personal space. Personal space is commonly valued within each person and is an often practice in American society. It can be defined as that uneasy feeling you get when someone inches a little too close for your liking. With some further observations, I was able to conclude that there is a correlation between personal space and the degree of a person’s relationship. For example, if a close friend were to surpass your personal space, it is deemed acceptable because of the strong bond you two

For this article I choose to read the Nadioo.pdf. which deals with the proxemics and intimacy of personal space. Personally I was very interested in this article. A student at Penn State University constructed an experiment on the social relations of society on individuals responsive behavior of invasion to their personal space. The student used himself as the experimenter and observer in order to assure that the relationships were between proximity, gender, race, and intimacy. The recipients of the experiment included friends, acquaintances, and strangers and asking each one questions as mean of communication. With each question he would decrease the space between him and the other person; and see if each recipient would respond in the following

“Connectedness” has number of definitions as it is a common term used in both psychology and mathematically. But this project specifically will be discussed not only about social and professional relationships but also the relationships among various group of people or things within the society and the way people can measure or evaluate the connections or the relationships among those people or groups.

People often do not have good communication with people they are close to although they believe that they do. Even married couples can communicate like strangers. Boaz Keysar reveals that people over-estimate their relationships with other people and they take the communication for granted. They are biased and can’t make a good judgment of the level of closeness of their communication.

Do anxious people need more personal space than a regular person? Personal space is a distance boundary you feel comfortable being next to a person face to face. According to the popular article by Douglas Main, an average person has a boundary of 20 to 40 centimeters and an anxious person have a boundary of 30 to 50 centimeter, according to the original article by Chiara F. Sambo and Gian D. Iannetti. Two tests were conducted to verify if anxiety really causes a person to need a larger personal space. On the first test, participants will get stimulated and on the second test, participants will get questionnaires to answer.

Human relationships are the foundation of human life, they strongly influence other individual’s behaviour (Bercheid et al., 2000). There are different types of relationships such as co workers, friendship, marriage which all involve a connection and therefore is an important characteristic of the formation of human relationships (Salisch 1996). The purpose of this essay is to explore research within human relationships and the relevant social psychological theories that have been linked with this conflicting topic. The theories that will be discussed throughout this essay will be the attribution theory, social learning theory, social exchange, attachment theory, evolutionary theory and the breakdown of relationships. This would initially

Its scope is very broad relationship; So often offset by the amount, always increasing, of mere acquaintances low quality of an intimate circle of real friends and confidants, which is impoverished because of this expansion. They are always eager to open the door and get to the next.