When we were kings responding to texts
In the film Muhammad Ali and George Foreman are presented to be the pinnacle of boxing. Especially Muhammad Ali you are made to think he is the greatest boxer to ever live. They presented to be the bad guy. This is because the victor decides history they all ways have and always will. They make you think of Ali and George are described to be types of animals at one point of the movie. You are expected to root for Ali and to hate George Foreman. Ali and Foreman are presented to be different from everyone else. I In the way that Ali is said to be touched by the gods. George is presented to be inhuman because of how devastating his punchers were. In the film George has been made to be easily to manipulate.
…show more content…
You are made to wait till the end of the film. This gives the film a suspense that makes you want to search it up to find out who won. The film uses things Ali says to draw in people and to get there attention. The way Ali says things gives the film a sense of understanding that you wouldn’t get if he wasn’t in the documentary. The sound in the film is very well done it fitting for the sense they placed them in. Well it wouldn’t be a good documentary now would it. There wasn’t much music from what I remember apart from the music that fits in with the documentary. The background sound was very well done, it was so well done you wouldn’t know there was any. The music along side the sound gave it a very suspenseful filling. This made it very engaging to watch, I didn’t know how far in I was till I checked and was surprised to see I was nearly done. The documentary is talking about before Ali fights Foreman. The end of the documentary is the fight its self, but it wouldn’t be a good documentary if it didn’t do it like this the setting is well time from pass to present tense. This is done so you understand that its talking about Ali and not Foreman. Also that is what a documentary does so you can understand and learn about what there talking about. The story is very well written this is because it’s a documentary and following a true story so it’s a matter of
Muhammad Ali was a great boxer he was born January 17, 1942. He won the heavy weight champion he also went to jail because he did not want to service for his country so he was put in jail for five years. The reason why Muhammad Ali started to fight was because some stole his bike and Ali went to the police and the police told him that he needs to know how to fight so he started to train Ali and at 12 he knew that he had to fight. Muhammad won his first fight in 1954. In 1956 Ali to go win the golden gloves. Ali fought for the heavy weight a British champion. In 1963 Ali knocked out Sonny Liston and in 1964 became the heavy weight champion.
Muhammad Ali was a man made to box. He had a great career before him since he made his first professional fight under President Eisenhower presidency. His Professional Career was really
Gorn goes to discuss the rules and regulations of boxing, stating; “The two athletes settle on a site for the fight. Strip to their shirts, roll their sleeves up…” (Gorn, pg.37) By adding this information and going to such detail as he does; “At the end of the fight the boxers are bruised, disfigured, and covered with blood, which they spit out, vomit out, or drip from the nose.” allows the reader to get a feel for how violent these fights were but also to allow readers to dive into the fight with their feet first. Gorn goes on to discuss more fights and discusses ‘The Great
Boxing in the 1960’s was one of the biggest sources of entertainment to most American’s. Back in the 60’s one could compare a heavyweight championship fight to our modern day super bowl. If American’s didn’t have a television, they would be standing by their radios listening. Unfortunately during the same time period race relations were at an all-time low. Boxing was integrated, although black boxers were still under pressure to conform to white America’s social limitations. One man stayed true to himself, so that others would find courage to do the same.
They seemed to have gotten as much information as possible and put it together in away that would make the most emotional impact on the audience. There wasn’t really a timeline or plot; it was difficult to find exactly what the director wanted to say. They switched between Tilikum’s story and the different stories of attacks. The documentary had trouble staying consistent.
Using the analogy “take a punch on the chin”, Murphy draws attention to the similarities between Adam Goodes and Muhammad Ali, how they were both fighters and held much respect from their fellows and well as their opponents. To further demonstrate the comparison between the two, Murphy utilizes the alliteration “hardest hits” to emphasize the strength and resilience of both Adam Goodes and Muhammad Ali and their unwavering belief in their heritage and culture and how they would always stand up against the emotional hits they would receive. Through this, Murphy is able to point out the similarities between Adam Goodes and a universally acknowledged fighting legend such as Muhammad Ali and get readers part of the booing crowd to view him as a
On March 8, 1971, Ali got his chance to regain his heavyweight crown against reigning champ Joe Frazier in what was billed as the “Fight of the Century.” (History Staff). Ali’s hiatus proved he still had the skill to be the champion
Later admitting that he adopted the persona from legendary 1940s-‘50s wrestler “Gorgeous” George Wagner, the attitude toward competition often made Ali the man you love to
Immediately after the main character arrives to the boxing ring is when he faces a new challenge that he must overcome. This fight between classmates has him worried that he might not even get a chance to give his speech. The author implies that the setting of the boxing ring can intimidate anybody if there were in the same position. The author states that “I want to get at that ginger-colored nigger. Tear him limb from limb…I stood against the ropes trembling” (Ellison 208). This hostile environment allowed the readers to see what position the main character finds himself in the middle of. This boxing ring allows readers to get a better picture of what the story is about. The use of an environment where he is forced to do something while blindfolded and beaten for entertainment
Bruce Russell booms out of the radio , “Mohammad Ali is dead at 74.”The surrounding beeping noises drown to my sudden realisation,Muhammad Ali is dead. Reaching home every news channel I turn to is recounting his life from Al Jazeera to Fox News. Muhammad Ali a former heavyweight champion boxer and one of the greatest sporting figures of the 20th century. An Olympic gold medalist and the first fighter to capture the heavyweight title three times, Ali won 56 times in his 21-year professional career. This is a long way away from his humble beginning.
“Battle Royal” open’s with the narrator’s grandfather giving a speech on being complacent to the white man – conforming to his world. In the grandfather’s speech he talks about being a trader, living in the enemy’s country, saying “Yes sir” when answering the white man and smiling and grinning in the white man’s face. The grandfather wanted the narrator and the reader to know that in doing so a black man would survive in a white man’s world, on the other hand, the grandfather did not want the narrator to fall into the belief that he was better than others in the black community.
When We Were Kings is primarily made of stock films besides when there are people who come into the film to speak on this behalf. These pieces of stock film including Ali training, speaking highly of himself, George Foreman training, and also many musical clips were inserted giving a more African film. One clip that really stuck out to me was after the narrator talks about how Foreman would be punching a watermelon size whole into his punching bag which then they showed a clip of Foreman at practice and he really has punched a giant dent in the bag. They then showed stock film of Ali also entering the gym where the narrator spoke over the clip saying when Ali would enter the gym he would not give any attention to Foreman and the damage he was doing to his punching bag, instead he would just walk by the man as if he were a nobody.
When We Were Kings emphasises on Muhammad Ali’s arrogance and egotism through the use of voiceover narration. Gast introduces Ali into the film with video clips of his extroverted and charismatic persona. Throughout the film, Ali supporters chant his name "Ali bumbaye, Ali bumbaye" (Ali, kill him), that exaggerate his drive to defeat his opponent. When We Were Kings presents Ali’s opponent George Foreman as an inhuman being, setting him up as a practically unbeatable man who is seen throughout the
In the article The Ring, author Danielle Malico paints a very vivid picture of what it would be like to actually be in the boxing ring as a fighter. In her thesis within the opening paragraph, Malico states “Many know what it is like to be a spectator, but few know the fighter’s experience” (Malico, n.d., p. 135). This thesis is stated clearly, and it is a fact that few actually know what the fighter experiences. The thesis gives the reader an indication of where the rest of the article is headed next. Starting in the next paragraph, the reader is able to visualize the experience in their minds as they read. Almost everyone has seen a boxing match, at least on television or on an internet video, so the description triggers the memories of
The music is appropriated to the visual images. When George is thinking about his daughter is going to leave him, it has background music of ¡§My Girl¡¨, and the lyric fits his feeling. The film uses narration, George tells what is going to be happened and defines the places. It is effective because the story is very realistic and the language is funny.