My journey from non-belief to trenchant atheism began with The Bible.
My story stands in contrast to Michael Collett’s touching story of sincere faith lost. Bit I take particular issue with Michael Jensen’s seemingly polite reply to Collett’s article. “I hope I’ve put Collet’s case…in such a way as he would recognise it”, he simpers, before paraphrasing Collett’s denial of God’s existence in a way which amounts to a “tacit acknowledgement that God exists”.
Since I did not grow up in a Christian household, attend church, or even have to endure Bible lessons at school, when I first actually read the contents of the Bible in my teens they came as a considerable surprise.
Opening the book at 900 year old patriarchs …Skipping to the
…show more content…
Even after Lincoln invented the lightning rod it took nearly a half century for the western world to shed this belief, and use the lighting rod.
Century after century of Christendom saw superstition supplanted by science. The Earth isn’t flat, nor does the sun revolve around it. Our intuitions about the world have mostly been wrong: one by one collapsing under the weight of scientific discovery.
Michael Collett ‘s faith collapsed due to the lack of evidence. Jensen agrees that “if the evidence is not good, then don’t believe it”.
“Suppose there is a God…”, implores Jensen. Suppose there is a Creator. Suppose God as more than a force, as a personal, relational God who loves humans. “It’s not an outlandish idea, even if you yourself don’t believe it.”
No, taken in such vague, subjective terms, I suppose it is not outlandish. But believing in some sort of creator, or personal God, is not equivalent in believing in fully fledged Christianity. For instance, the Nicene Creed, or profession of the faith, involves adherence to the virgin birth, the divinity of Jesus, the resurrection/salvation narrative, the holy spirit, and the existence of heaven and hell.
My departed father clearly failed to instil in me the idea that we should go around supposing things.
Hailing from the poor Ibrox-tenements of Glasgow, he was a sapper in the British army on D-day 14, and a UN peacekeeper who helped clean up after the King David Hotel
It is said that man, to survive, has always needed something or some belief to hold on; be it science, religion or magic. Man without a belief lacks hope (Walker, 1997). Lack of hope makes a man vulnerable to unforeseen circumstances. To avoid this vulnerability man has been holding onto different belief systems.
In William K. Clifford’s, “The Ethics of Belief (II),” he argues that humans must always question their conceptions and beliefs.
Fowler saw faith as greater than religious faith and viewed it as a “universal aspect of human existence” (Hutchison, 2015). The ultimate environment is an important element of Fowler’s theory. He saw faith as not only an internal image but also how one relates to that image. Faith is not an unchangeable image or idea, but a way of being. The six stages of
Over the course of the years, society has been reformed by new ideas of science. We learn more and more about global warming, outer space, and technology. However, this pattern of gaining knowledge did not pick up significantly until the Scientific Revolution. In the sixteenth and seventeenth century, the Scientific Revolution started, which concerned the fields of astronomy, mechanics, and medicine. These new scientists used math and observations strongly contradicting religious thought at the time, which was dependent on the Aristotelian-Ptolemy theory. However, astronomers like Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and Newton accepted the heliocentric theory. Astronomical findings of the Scientific Revolution disproved the fact that humans were
In Kelly James Clark’s Article “Without Evidence or Argument”, Clark argues that belief in God, does not require the support of evidence or argument in order for it to be rational. Clark’s argument is against W.K. Clifford’s article “The Ethics of Belief”, in which Clifford claims that everything must be believed only on the basis of sufficient evidence (139). Throughout Kelly Clark’s article he states many things that support his conclusion of belief without evidence or argument, however, my paper will only discuss what Clark says on p.139 starting with the paragraph “The first problem with Clifford’s…” and the following paragraph, ending with the words “...to see why.”
In life, there is a constant battle ensuing over faith and reason. Those two things are constantly feeding off of each other in someone’s mind when making a decision. Over time in which some say is a great conversation about history this battle is changing. The Great Conversation of history spans over many eras where the questions of faith and reason are always things battling for a spot in our minds, but they shouldn’t be in battle because they are very much dependent on the other. Among the time periods from Ancient Greece, the Enlightenment, and the 19th century, writers such as Socrates, Kant, and Martin Luther King Jr have looked at the issue of faith and reason.
Brown, Neil. "The New Atheism and The Existence of God.” Compass, 46, no. 3, 2-5. Kensington, Australia: Compass, Spring 2012.
Faith, defined as a strong belief in something which cannot be proven, has been argued over countless generations. Still, even without proof, individuals worldwide hold true to their faith each day. After studying faith and religion in texts written by scholars with varying backgrounds, it is easy to see faith is something which is widely disputed. Comparison of Sigmund Freud’s The Future of an Illusion and Paul Tillich’s Dynamics of Faith, fully displays the discrepancies in points of view on the function of faith, as well as the necessity of faith, in society; while the comparison of Viktor E. Frankl’s Man’s Search for Meaning and Karl Marx’s “on the Future of Religion,” demonstrate both similarities and differences
Without faith, life can feel like an endless, pointless maze with no escape. Faith is what brings human beings to feel complete in a world full of questions and factual sciences. Bradbury’s short story, “The Man,” shows readers how faith plays such a significant role in our lives. In “The Man,” astronauts Captain Hart and Lieutenant Martin came across a complex choice of faith when their rocket ship lands on a planet who had just witnessed Jesus’ second coming. Both characters respond to Jesus, or The Man quite differently. Martin went under the influence of the faithful citizens of the planet who had just experienced seeing their savior. He believed and followed their faith, finding a new, refreshing meaning in life, while Hart set out on an impossible mission to see if The Man was truly Christ. “The Man” tells readers that faith, no matter what kind, is what completes our lives as humans. Science creates a void in life which can only be filled through faith. Faith brings peace and ensures security in our lives by giving us a feeling of courage and a reason to live.
One argues that today we have a crisis of belief, not a crisis of faith. To explain this crisis, I will briefly examine the relationship between faith and belief, explain why cultural shift is important to note when trying to understand religious issues, go into detail on the three hallmarks of each of the two cultures by showing how they compare to each other, show how Tillich’s notion of correlation deals with this idea of culture and a crisis of belief, and explain how Marsh’s notion of a “theology of negotiation” (33) fits with Lonergan’s definition and allows him to argue that film can help us raise theological questions.
Zachary Bell Final Essay on Religion Professor Comer 4/18/16 1. Contained within John Caputo’s book On Religion are a variety of interesting views as it pertains to modern religion, which he labels as Post-secular. The most important of these views, which constitutes a major theme in the novel, is that religion can be present with or without religion. He explains this mostly by using a question “what do I love when I love my God?” He uses this question to state that God may be the embodiment of love, however, he agrees with Augustine that when people love for things deeply, they love God unknowingly.
He explained that with the open box there are things outside that can manipulate things within the box such as God with the real world. However the closed box which was the Russians worldview was closed and had no possibility of anything outside having impact. Norman describes the box that is open as reality for him. Norman argues that there can be two different factors in life not just the material world. He agrees that there is an earthly world but also argues for a spiritual world which was his explanation for the possibility of miracles. The book is filled with many other logical arguments and evidence for God and is formatted as a collection of evidence. Within the books there are also comparisons to atheism and Christianity. One instance this occurs in the book is the comparison in faith for an atheist and the faith to be a Christianity. Norman faith becoming greater when ever you have less evidence for your topic. Many people claim that you need more faith to be a christian than to be atheist however there is also a lot of evidence for Christianity and you might need more faith to be an atheist than to be a
With the mushrooming of god incarnations— offspring of a god and a mortal or a mortal raised to lesser divine rank— in thousands and the phenomenon of believer’s ever increasing ‘father-fixation’ and ‘mother-fixation’, mankind’s quest for god, divine and spirituality has been reduced to a false hope implicit in the modern anthropomorphic gods.
The “scientific mind”, or how people think about the world, has changed multiple times throughout history. Before the 1700s, people had a more religious-based point of view on life; the church was considered to be far more important than it is today. With the church’s iron grip over society and its people, it came with a shock as the 1700s passed by and more and more people started to think for themselves. The acceptance of having more freedom, when it came to religion and change, changed the world forever.During the scientific revolution, Isaac Newton, Rene Descartes, and Francis Bacon all came up with principal scientific
People in our society today who have the atheist point of view on religion, which is the belief that there is no god, are going against the so-called norms of society, and therefor are seen as deviant. Deviance is just an idea. Society determines what is deviant by the ideas they hold of what should be the norm. Atheism is seen as a negative deviance, or below the norm. They have a status that is placed on them in society. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they believe in evil, although that is how it is sometimes viewed from people in society who have a specific religion or faith. Atheism, which is not a new idea, has been evolving in our society, and is the reason for problems leading to debate and court cases, and for