Narrative Loss And The Melancholic Reader Of Johnny Tremain

Trauma and tragedy are inevitably regular and pervasive outcomes in romantic literature. Our literary heritage is filled with heartbreak, failed relationships and broken individuals. Wuthering Heights and Khaled Hosseini’s A Thousand Splendid Suns both exhibit broken relationships, through a backdrop of conflict in swar torn Afghanistan and the restrictions of Victorian social hierarchy played out on the wild and windswept North York Moors- destroying these implied impervious bonds.

Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet – popularly considered by many to be the quintessential love story of all time – is a play that we are all familiar with in one way or another. Whether it be through the plethora of portrayals, adaptations and performances that exist or through your own reading of the play, chances are you have been acquainted with this tale of “tragic love” at some point in your life. Through this universal familiarity an odd occurrence can be noted, one of almost canonical reverence for the themes commonly believed to be central to the plot. The most widely believed theme of Romeo and Juliet is that of the ideal love unable to exist under the harsh social and political strains of this world. Out of this idea emerge two

George Gascoigne’s The Adventures of Master FJ primarily focuses on the affair between FJ and Dame Ellinor. During his time with Dame Ellinor, FJ establishes himself as a man “bounden to love”; however, this declaration is untrue and proven so when Frances tells that story of Bess, her lover, and her husband. The tale about Bess is meant to bring FJ to full realization that the affair he is having with Ellinor is temporary and built solely on lustful feelings. The circumstantial equivalency between FJ and the lover, as well as Ellinor and Bess, is obvious; however, their emotions towards their respective lovers differ greatly. When Bess is discovered by her husband, she repents and ends her affair and her lover to follow her wishes.

The importance of cherishing the invaluable individuals in one’s life is apparent in Matthew Teague’s personal journey of his wife’s battle against cancer and a genuine friendship. “The Friend” depicts emotional appeal, comparisons, and vivid imagery to portray the significance of valuing loved ones. There is no single definition for a loved one. A spouse, children, family, friends, the reciprocated love can build everlasting bonds, but why is it so important to treasure the relationships we have? Just because they are family, it may not signify that we love them; just because they are acquaintances, it does not necessarily indicate that we have a type of love for them either. The pure love we possess for someone is rare and never chosen or obliged, so this valuable love should be nurtured, for people are bound within unpredictable time limits. Nichole’s, Teague’s wife’s, diagnosis of cancer was a realization for him that his days with her were numbered. Along the way, Dane Faucheux, the couple’s friend, was devoted to aiding the Teague family during their struggling time. Faucheux’s undisputed support for Teague and his family surprised him numerous times throughout their experience. This love in the sublime story is seeped with appreciation for those Teague values in his life. The realization and worth of his deep endearment for his family and friend is transferred to the reader, and he or she begins to realize the reality of the given time to value those who are most important.

The Lapham family betrayed Johnny, just because of Johnny’s hand that was burned while making a teapot for John Hancock. Before the incident, Mrs. Lapham use to treat Johnny very well, proper and as a gifted person in her family. After the incident Mrs. Lapham called Johnny a useless person that is only good for picking up rags and virtually told Johnny to get out of the house. Johnny was even betrayed by his own family and the proof was a silver cup that the entire family knew about. After leaving the Lapham family, being jobless, and starving Johnny decided to use his last resort, which was the silver cup that was given to him by his mother. The entire family rejected Johnny when they were in private, and in court without any sympathy, even though the Lyte family knew Johnny’s case about his dead mother. Jonathan Lyte, a very wealthy, successful, and popular merchant in Boston, accused Johnny of stealing one of the cups that belong to Jonathan Lyte. Luckily during the case, Cilla was there to support Johnny. According to Jonathan Lyte, someone stole one of his silver cups in August, however Johnny Tremain had showed the silver cup to Cilla on July. That proves that Johnny did not steal Jonathan Lytes silver cup and the silver cup belonged to Johnny Tremain. Johnny was betrayed by his own family, which pretended that they never knew him. Close to the end when the Lyte family were leaving Boston, going back London, Lavinia Lyte, Jonathan Lyte’s daughter, admitted that Johnny Tremain was part of their

Through the precise use of diction between the woman (“jig”) and the man, Hemingway reveals how a lack of knowing someone can lead to emotional dismay. Concise diction in a relationship means, conversation only scratches the surface and the two “lovers” don’t truly know about the other person’s emotions. The story is full of short, one-line phrases of conversation between the couple about trivial things. They converse about the “lovely hills” and the “simple operation,” yet they never ask each other about their feelings. The lack of in depth communication of opinions creates a tension filled atmosphere that just keeps building up and up as the story continues. The “simple operation,” an abortion, is seen by the couple as the issue they need to resolve, however, the man, who can’t handle the responsibility, instead of talking it through with his “lover” chooses to manipulate her. He tries to convince jig, who is easily pushed-over as she is stuck by lust and will do anything to keep the relationship together. She doesn’t care to sacrifice her happiness for his, rather she fears that if she doesn’t go through with the operation, he will leave her, she is indecisive and relies on the man to make many decisions. The man deceives

Johnny turns into vegetable and cannot earn anymore money, his status is lowered. Johnny doesn’t want people to feel pity for him, or else it will hurt his astronomically ginormous ego. So he leaves the Laphams and sets off a journey to find a join, unfortunately he gets rejected by various artisan jobs. The butcher offers him a job, but his pride does not allow him to take the job. While Johnny tries to find a job, Mr. Laphams moves on and tries to find another heir for the shop. One day at the Laphams house Mr Tweedie (future heir) and Johnny Tremain run into each other, Johnny verbally assaults Mr. Tweedie, adding another enemy to his collection. Johnny Tremain continues his sad life and runs into the Boston Observer, a newspaper printer. He meets Rab, they get along well and Ran offers Johnny a job as a delivery boy, but Johnny declines. Johnny

William Shakespeare once wrote, “the course of true love never did run smooth.” Shakespeare’s philosophy, extracted from A Midsummer Night’s Dream, appropriately pertains to the storylines of Edgar Allen Poe’s “Annabel Lee” and Alfred Noyes “The Highwayman”. Within Poe’s “Annabel Lee”, the narrator depicts of the true love that he and his “Annabel Lee” harbored but it evokes resentful angels to pursue and murder his lover. As within Noyes’ “The Highwayman”, the narrator portrays of a love so pure between the highwayman and Bess, the landlord’s daughter, in which Bess willingly sacrifices her life in hopes of saving the highwayman from being killed but

Hanna Mann 27 October, 2015 Period Three Timorous Hero Heroes are often thought of a person who is idolized for courage and noble deeds. This characterization is not always the case however, heroes are not habitually dauntless. In S. E. Hinton’s book The Outsiders Johnny Cade is recognized for these traits. Johnny Cade has a tanned face with jet black eyes and hair and is known for being small yet having a slight build.

Johnny Tremain went to Paul Revere in chapter two because he had questions for Mr. Revere. I think this event was important to Johnny Tremain because it gave him advice. Johnny had been confused with his own work, therefore he went to Mr. Revere. When Johnny went there he had asked Mr. Revere how he felt about his work. Johnny had felt that his work was amiss, even though his master, Mr. Lapham always said it had been right. On page thirty the book, Johnny Tremain states, “Although my master thinks it’s all right, I’m not sure.” From this readers can infer that Johnny was vague about his work. This quote relates to my answer because it tells that Johnny did not feel quite right about his work. This talk was also important to Johnny because

When the narrator first encounters the girl, his friend's older sister, he can only see her silhouette in the “light from the half-opened door”. This is the beginning of his infatuation with the girl. After his discovery, he is plagued by thoughts of the girl which make his daily obligations seem like “ugly, monotonous, child's play”. He has become blinded by the light. The narrator not only fails to learn the name of his “girl”, he does not realize that his infatuation with a woman considerably older than himself is not appropriate. He relishes in his infatuation, feeling “thankful [he] could see so little” while he thinks of the distant “lamp or lighted window” that represents his girl. The narrator is engulfed by the false light that is his futile love.

James' manipulation of appearances in Daisy Miller as well as other character's notions of these appearances provides us with a novella of enigmatic and fascinating characters. Daisy, the most complicated of these ambiguities, is as mysterious as she is flirtatious. James gives her a carefully constructed enigmatic quality that leaves the reader wondering what her motivations were and who she truly was. He structures the novella in such a way as to stress the insights that the supporting characters provide into Daisy's character, weather accurate or erroneous. Despite their questionable reliability, they allow James to make commentary on both European and American cultures and social class.

The author carefully crafts the story so that every detail contributes to a certain unique or single effect, whether it is as complex as irony or as simple as depiction of feelings. The Husband describes his absolute love for Ann as he reminisces about the years he spent with her and how deeply he "knows"

       As the tale begins we immediately can sympathize with the repressive plight of the protagonist.  Her romantic imagination is obvious as she describes the "hereditary estate" (Gilman, Wallpaper 170) or the "haunted house" (170) as she would like it to be.  She tells us of her husband, John, who "scoffs" (170) at her romantic sentiments and is "practical to the extreme" (170).  However, in a time

“The course of true love never did run smooth,” comments Lysander of love’s complications in an exchange with Hermia (Shakespeare I.i.136). Although the play A Midsummer Night’s Dream certainly deals with the difficulty of romance, it is not considered a true love story like Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeare, as he unfolds the story, intentionally distances the audience from the emotions of the characters so he can caricature the anguish and burdens endured by the lovers. Through his masterful use of figurative language, Shakespeare examines the theme of the capricious and irrational nature of love.