preview

Norman Cousins Who Killed Benny Paret

Decent Essays

The sport of boxing is a conflict sport that causes thousands of injuries and even deaths every year. As with any conflict sport harm to a participant is expected, but when the injury stretches to the extreme of a death it is a shocking outcome that involves many investigations. These investigations point fingers at both plausible and implausible causes this deaths. Norman Cousins points out the potential causes during the Griffith v. Paret Match that resulted in the death of Benny Paret in his essay Who Killed Benny Paret? Cousins in Who Killed Benny Paret? Uses cause and effect to state what most likely lead to Paret’s boxing death. Cousins first brings up the multiple reasons that most investigators point to being the cause of the fatality. He states that in the …show more content…

Cousins provides that the nature of prize boxing itself is the main factor. He first bring up the style of the fighting that prizefighting consist of. Cousin makes the point that the proponents of the boxing “searched for killers and sluggers and maulers” as opposed to boxers skilled with the technical aspects of pugilism. He links this with fatalities by stating that although a man can take a punch repeated impacts will cause damage and has a risk of killing the man being stuck. Next he also loops the fans into the nature of boxing. He states that “crowd comes alive” when violent acts occur such as “when the blood squirts out of his nose or eyes”. This shows that the crowd not only permits the injuries, but encourages them. The crowded rather than celebrating the sport for its martial arts treated it the boxers like animals trying to kill another. This encouragement and draw to gore acts a contributor to boxing having a violent and ugly and gore filled nature. These examples point to the main cause of Paret’s death being the nature of boxing and how it at time was simply a

Get Access