Nuclear Power is the Short Term Solution
The world's natural resources are being consumed at an alarming rate. As these resources diminish, people will be seeking alternative sources by which to generate electricity for heat and light. The only practical short-term solution for the energy/pollution crisis should be nuclear power because it is available, cleaner and safer.
The needs for alternative energy are present today with China and India growing in population and increasing their oil consumption. In addition, the demand and competition for oil in a near future will eventually be too great for the supply; indeed, our lifestyles are currently based on inefficient energy devices. This includes automobiles and electric appliances that
…show more content…
The amount of land, materials and fuel are very much smaller to. In addition, improvements in the nuclear productivity have contributed significantly to the reduction of the greenhouse effect. Ensuring the right balance is struck between the needs of the economy and those of the environment. Also environmental monitoring programs are been set up before bringing nuclear fuel on site. This may include monitoring of the nearby lakes, milk from cows, broad leafy vegetables, and fish. In this way we know exactly what effect the operation of the plant is having on the environment.
With any large energy producing facility there are risks. The truth is that accidents do happen at nuclear power plants and at other facilities all the time. An example of this was the accident at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania where there was a partial meltdown in March 1979. More recently was the worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl. Statistical data for 1995, released by the International Atomic Energy Agency early in 1996, indicated that there were a total of 437 operational nuclear power stations in 31 countries with years of experience. Chernobyl was the only plant that injured the public. Thus, judging by the data, that is a good record for a source of energy. The International Energy Agency estimates that by the year 2003 forty percent of the world's energy production will be from sources other than fossil fuels or nuclear power. Nevertheless, the need for
As a result of the current global warming issues and the ever growing scarcity of our current energy resources we may be forced to resort to nuclear energy. The Department of Energy has already given its support to energy companies who have decided to construct nuclear power plants. It appears that nuclear power is the right course to take, but before this decision is finalised it is important to weigh the multiple advantages and disadvantages of nuclear power. There are many pros and cons, but they weigh up almost equally which makes it a hard decision to choose the right course of action, nuclear power or non-nuclear power.
Nuclear power plants were set up to harness the energy and provide electricity to a large proportion of people and this energy was very efficient and was long lasting. This technology was also put to use into the medical field to treat cancer patient. The result had a positive and negative effect on the environment. It contaminated the oceans and river there by effecting the fishes and the corals, the radiation emitted had an effect on the human body and to animals. But this source of energy paved a way to greener way of generating electricity and to take an account of global warming and climatic change. In an open letter, more than 65 biologists supported the call to build more nuclear power plants as a global plan to protect the wildlife and the environment and the full gamut of the source (the energy) should put into effect to replace the other fossil fuel such as the oil, coal to cut the effect of severe climate change. Of the many technologies to generate electricity, nuclear power and wind have the highest chance to reduce major climatic effect caused by burning coal which is almost half the global carbon dioxide
As the global population grows, economies expand, and standards of living increase, energy will continue to be an essential enabler of opportunity. We are executing a wide-ranging strategy to ensure that we are at the forefront of providing the needed energy — today and tomorrow.
Provided that countries can acquire uranium, they can create clean and safe energy. Generally nuclear power stations are safe. The various barriers and numerous safety measures make it very unlikely for catastrophes to transpire. The most up-to-date plants have a reactor core failure 1 in 1 million years. The proposal of building a plant has to be scrutinized intensely so that the barriers and structure ensure a redundant job in
Climate change is beginning to become more and more of a serious problem in today’s modern age. It’s because we use too many fossil fuels like gas, coal, and oil. These fossil fuels are polluting our Earth faster than we will be able to fix it. Nuclear energy will be able to fix that problem. With cutting out oils, gases, and coal, it would produce fewer greenhouse gasses and make the world a significantly cleaner place. The World Nuclear Association, said that: “Increased awareness of the dangers and effects of global warming and climate change has led decision makers, media and the public to realize that the use of fossil fuels must be reduced and replaced by low-emission sources of energy, such as nuclear power, the only readily available large-scale alternative to fossil fuels for production of continuous, reliable supply of electricity.” The uses of nuclear energy will have very few, if any at all, effects on the Earth’s climate and will help
Nuclear power has always been marked as a dangerous source of energy. It is not. Nuclear power accounts for 20% of our electricity production, yet only 5 deaths can be attributed to it, none actually nuclear related, with 4 deaths due to electrocution and 1 death from a falling object (World Nuclear Association). We have had only three nuclear power accidents that resulted in nuclear contamination in the 65 years we have been producing energy; Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and Fukushima Daiichi. Chernobyl was the result of a fairly primitive, unsafe design and untrained operators (Chernobyl). The disaster happened during a special test that should have been safe, but the operators did not follow the safe procedures. Even so, after the problems had already arisen, the operators could had turned back on the automatic controls, that is, just let the plant control itself, the disaster would not have happened. Three Mile Island also was mainly a result
In our modern world of today, we use increasingly more energy every day. According to the most recent study done by the US Energy Information Administration in 2008, the world uses 493 quadrillion BTUs or energy a year, and 82% of the energy is generated from fossil fuels. This source makes clear, that fossil fuels are a big part of life, and as they run out, it is more and more important to find a solution. In the midst of a polluted world, what we need is a powerful, sustainable, and clean energy source. Solar power, wind power, geothermal heating/cooling, biomass burning, and hydro-electric turbines all seem like good solutions. At first glance, nuclear power does too. Its powerful, sustainable, and will last a long time right? However, if you take a closer look, and you can see that nuclear energy is not the answer.
The world is caught between diminishing energy resources and increasing climate change. Countries around the world (like Russia, China, India, South Korea, France, UK, USA) with their growing population highlight how important the demand for energy is fueling the global economy. If this demand is met by the massive carbon emissions from fossil fuels, then we are headed to a climate Armageddon. The most realistic solution for this exponential demand is nuclear energy. The use of nuclear energy will provide sufficient energy to power economies without the need to cause global warming.
Humans have depended on fossil fuel energy for a long time, however, with climate change and national security becoming a major focal point we need to pursuit other energy sources besides fossils fuel. Therefore, many nations are looking for greener and safe alternatives energy. Furthermore, with the threat of terrorism, countries are now motivated to looking for energy sources, which do not come from oil rich countries that sponsors terrorism. This is the reason the nuclear power alternatives has made a significant come back in the energy discussion. When one speaks of nuclear most people only can think of the negative aspect of nuclear energy, such as safety issue. I will discuss are the pros
Furthermore, the article suggest that reprocessing will lead to the construction of more low-level nuclear facilities (paragraph eight, ucsusa.org, 04/05/2011), which points more facilities are going to be builted unnecessarily, leading to the contamination of more land. The idea of nuclear power facilities to recycle their waste hurts the enviroment.
When the words nuclear energy comes out of an individual’s mouth there are always people associating it with harm. Most of time people think of the nuclear bombs, nuclear waste or other horrible incidents. There is no doubt that these are the wrong ways of using and looking at nuclear energy. However, there are many positives about nuclear energy. Unfortunately, the nuclear energy that could be talked about today is being ignored and shut down. The thought of terrible incidents are clouding the vision for a potential brighter and better future. The present day people, filled with too much sensitivity, are obstructing those who try to better their countries with the addition of more nuclear reactors. Although nuclear waste can be hazardous, in fact, nuclear energy has a very positive impact on the economy and the environment.
This report presents an alternative energy is any energy source that from fossil fuel. We need to turn to alternative energy in general. Firstly, we were in danger of ruining the planet’s climate through fossil fuel emissions. Furthermore, we cannot keep using fossil fuels forever that will run out someday [1]. In addition, the problem of the current energy that we can focus was energy security and independence viewpoint because our nation has increased its dependence on foreign oil supplies instead of decreasing it especially from nations under the rule of a dictator or unstable countries where human rights violations are common [2].
Nuclear energy is generally looked at as a terrible thing, but most people do not know everything about it. All they know is the terrible accidents that have happened. There has been three terrible accidents in the history of the world because of nuclear power. The first and, by far the worst, was Chernobyl. Chernobyl was the plant exploded due to the core reactor coolant failure. The next accident was the only one in the United States, which was Three Mile Island, and nobody was killed from this accident. The reactor started to leak radiation onto the surrounding area, but did not affect anything off the island. In the article Honest Debate Needed on the Nuclear Option David Robert
Several factors regarding both the environment and economy make nuclear energy a worthwhile investment. Without a doubt, climate change due to the emission of greenhouse gases impacts the environment and poses a threat to ecosystems and the health of humans. The trapping of solar heat from gases such as carbon dioxide and methane is a result of human activities. Specifically, most of the carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere is from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil. However, the alternative usage of nuclear energy does not emit greenhouse gases, reducing the cause of climate change. In addition to being more appropriate than fossil fuel regarding air pollution, nuclear energy is independent. While fossil fuels depend on a supply of decayed organisms, solar and wind energy depend
One of the biggest problems we face in the growing world today, not just as a country but also as the whole planet, is the rapidly evolving energy crisis. With the depletion of our fossil fuels on the rise, along with mass pollution emitted from the power plants that produce energy from these sources, we turn to other methods of producing electricity to help provide the vast majority of power for the world. The biggest issue with factoring out fossil fuel is that currently, fossil fuels create such a large percentage of the world’s electricity, and the majority of ways to produce electricity, that closing the gap left by fossil fuels means mass development on a global scale of other methods to produce electricity or creating a new way to produce electricity that is surpassingly effective.