Nuclear Power is the Short Term Solution Essay

Fossil fuels and other power generates are slowly changing the world. Alternative power sources are slowly becoming more popular in everyday life while the technology progresses. Using these power sources that don’t pollute the atmosphere could be the change in the world that completely changes the way the world uses energy. Engineers and technicians have been producing these alternative ways for years and years. A few, but not limited to consist of: Solar panels, Wind turbines, Wave tech and much more.

Nuclear power plants were set up to harness the energy and provide electricity to a large proportion of people and this energy was very efficient and was long lasting. This technology was also put to use into the medical field to treat cancer patient. The result had a positive and negative effect on the environment. It contaminated the oceans and river there by effecting the fishes and the corals, the radiation emitted had an effect on the human body and to animals. But this source of energy paved a way to greener way of generating electricity and to take an account of global warming and climatic change. In an open letter, more than 65 biologists supported the call to build more nuclear power plants as a global plan to protect the wildlife and the environment and the full gamut of the source (the energy) should put into effect to replace the other fossil fuel such as the oil, coal to cut the effect of severe climate change. Of the many technologies to generate electricity, nuclear power and wind have the highest chance to reduce major climatic effect caused by burning coal which is almost half the global carbon dioxide

In our modern world of today, we use increasingly more energy every day. According to the most recent study done by the US Energy Information Administration in 2008, the world uses 493 quadrillion BTUs or energy a year, and 82% of the energy is generated from fossil fuels. This source makes clear, that fossil fuels are a big part of life, and as they run out, it is more and more important to find a solution. In the midst of a polluted world, what we need is a powerful, sustainable, and clean energy source. Solar power, wind power, geothermal heating/cooling, biomass burning, and hydro-electric turbines all seem like good solutions. At first glance, nuclear power does too. Its powerful, sustainable, and will last a long time right? However, if you take a closer look, and you can see that nuclear energy is not the answer.

However, when looking at nuclear energy one need to consider the “two factors that impede the consideration of adoption of nuclear power - fear and expense.” (Easton, 2010, p. 221) If these factors could be overcome, we could gain the benefits of the this resource Reviving nuclear energy technology will help to reduce the need to burn oil, coal, or any other fuel that emit air pollution because nuclear reactor does not emit air pollution. Overall, it does not contribute to harming the environment. Furthermore, the use of nuclear energy as stated earlier will help eliminate the need for foreign oil and giving the country the much-needed national security and a green energy policy that will curve global warming.

Nuclear energy is generally looked at as a terrible thing, but most people do not know everything about it. All they know is the terrible accidents that have happened. There has been three terrible accidents in the history of the world because of nuclear power. The first and, by far the worst, was Chernobyl. Chernobyl was the plant exploded due to the core reactor coolant failure. The next accident was the only one in the United States, which was Three Mile Island, and nobody was killed from this accident. The reactor started to leak radiation onto the surrounding area, but did not affect anything off the island. In the article Honest Debate Needed on the Nuclear Option David Robert

These plants reduced the toxic pollution caused by coal fired plants significantly while these plants also saved 64 gigtonnes of carbon dioxide. Any negative impacts of nuclear power are destroyed by the positive impacts. This paper is not supposed to suggest that the lives lost were insignificant in any way, but just illuminate the incredible impact on lives saved by the use of nuclear power.

The first step to deciding on the use of nuclear power entails looking at its pros. These advantages include its

Just about every part of today’s society involves energy of some sorts. But as our society progresses, the need for better, more efficient power sources must be addressed. Out of all of the choices, the most popular to date is nuclear power. Nuclear power is a growing industry that is getting mixed reviews from various sources. But which side is right? Is nuclear power the future? Or is it just another problem the world will have to deal with? The answer is simple. Nuclear Energy is the future and will power almost the entire world one day. Nuclear power is the best source of power because it produces lots of power, it produces clean energy, it is cheap, and it is sustainable.

Furthermore, the article suggest that reprocessing will lead to the construction of more low-level nuclear facilities (paragraph eight, ucsusa.org, 04/05/2011), which points more facilities are going to be builted unnecessarily, leading to the contamination of more land. The idea of nuclear power facilities to recycle their waste hurts the enviroment.

When the words nuclear energy comes out of an individual’s mouth there are always people associating it with harm. Most of time people think of the nuclear bombs, nuclear waste or other horrible incidents. There is no doubt that these are the wrong ways of using and looking at nuclear energy. However, there are many positives about nuclear energy. Unfortunately, the nuclear energy that could be talked about today is being ignored and shut down. The thought of terrible incidents are clouding the vision for a potential brighter and better future. The present day people, filled with too much sensitivity, are obstructing those who try to better their countries with the addition of more nuclear reactors. Although nuclear waste can be hazardous, in fact, nuclear energy has a very positive impact on the economy and the environment.

Climate change is beginning to become more and more of a serious problem in today’s modern age. It’s because we use too many fossil fuels like gas, coal, and oil. These fossil fuels are polluting our Earth faster than we will be able to fix it. Nuclear energy will be able to fix that problem. With cutting out oils, gases, and coal, it would produce fewer greenhouse gasses and make the world a significantly cleaner place. The World Nuclear Association, said that: “Increased awareness of the dangers and effects of global warming and climate change has led decision makers, media and the public to realize that the use of fossil fuels must be reduced and replaced by low-emission sources of energy, such as nuclear power, the only readily available large-scale alternative to fossil fuels for production of continuous, reliable supply of electricity.” The uses of nuclear energy will have very few, if any at all, effects on the Earth’s climate and will help

Several factors regarding both the environment and economy make nuclear energy a worthwhile investment. Without a doubt, climate change due to the emission of greenhouse gases impacts the environment and poses a threat to ecosystems and the health of humans. The trapping of solar heat from gases such as carbon dioxide and methane is a result of human activities. Specifically, most of the carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere is from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil. However, the alternative usage of nuclear energy does not emit greenhouse gases, reducing the cause of climate change. In addition to being more appropriate than fossil fuel regarding air pollution, nuclear energy is independent. While fossil fuels depend on a supply of decayed organisms, solar and wind energy depend

Energy crisis and climatic strain are two sides of one coin. You can never handle one without affecting the other considerably. The world is in search for more efficient and climatically friendly ways of producing electricity. However, we cannot say that we have achieved it all yet. Nuclear energy is one of the most reliable means of generating electricity. It is efficient with the number of kilowatts a nuclear plant can produce in a day. On the other side, accidents at a nuclear plant are way beyond fatal. Side effects are too lethal as well if safety measures are not taken into account. Health, safety, and environmental concerns are some of the most issues that make nuclear plants delicate. The radiations emitted from these plants can be adverse health wise. With all this summed up, the cons of nuclear energy overweigh the pros. Let's delve into its details and determine the same.

One of the biggest problems we face in the growing world today, not just as a country but also as the whole planet, is the rapidly evolving energy crisis. With the depletion of our fossil fuels on the rise, along with mass pollution emitted from the power plants that produce energy from these sources, we turn to other methods of producing electricity to help provide the vast majority of power for the world. The biggest issue with factoring out fossil fuel is that currently, fossil fuels create such a large percentage of the world’s electricity, and the majority of ways to produce electricity, that closing the gap left by fossil fuels means mass development on a global scale of other methods to produce electricity or creating a new way to produce electricity that is surpassingly effective.

This report presents an alternative energy is any energy source that from fossil fuel. We need to turn to alternative energy in general. Firstly, we were in danger of ruining the planet’s climate through fossil fuel emissions. Furthermore, we cannot keep using fossil fuels forever that will run out someday [1]. In addition, the problem of the current energy that we can focus was energy security and independence viewpoint because our nation has increased its dependence on foreign oil supplies instead of decreasing it especially from nations under the rule of a dictator or unstable countries where human rights violations are common [2].