Nursing Unconditional Simulation

Anything… the word I professed some time ago. I prayed the prayer that I would do anything. The woman who tends to always be in a state of trepidation, prayed that she would do anything for Him. From that one word, many plans surfaced. I had hoped that it was just spontaneous thoughts and that they did not mean anything. Among the list, was the idea of becoming a nurse. It was an outlandish notion. How on earth could I be a nurse? Somehow that random thought has turned into a reality. I am currently striving toward one of my “anythings”. I know that my current situation is definitely not by my own doing and that He has been continually opening doors. It has not been an easy road. Thoughts of doubt, negative

“In our society, aversive control through punishment is perhaps the most widespread means of controlling behavior. Our system of laws is backed up by threats of punishment. The reason punishment is the glue that holds so much of our society’s fabric together is that, for the most part, it seems to work. It is the fastest way to bring behavior under control” (Smith, 2013, p.

The degree to which differential reinforcement occurs is related to the degree, incidence and like hood of its occurrence. That is, reinforcement is most likely to

Punishment given to offenders acts as an example for society and deters others from committing the same crime. Punishment serves as proof and as a model to the rest of society that criminal behavior will have consequences and can be seen as an educational tool. When using punishment as a threat, warning or intimidation tactic for the prevention of evil, it is formally referred to as general deterrence. “General deterrence stems from the perceived threat or fear of the inherent elements of punishment itself, not through some indirect process. Examples of general deterrence from fear of direct sanctions are refraining from speeding for fear of a fine or in my argument, refraining from a felony for fear of incarceration” (Williams & Hawkins, 547). By presenting

For years nurses have gained experience in the medical field through clinical rounds at hospitals and doctors offices. Learning has always taken place first through textbooks and then through personal experience during required clinical time. These methods have proven effective but include limitations to the amount of exposure a student can gain before entering the workforce. A new way of learning is on the rise with the use of High Fidelity Simulations (HFS) or the Sim Man. HFS is a computerized life size manikin that simulates real human responses to treatment. This new technology allows students to practice rare procedures or treat common diagnoses.

Crime and Punishment Deterrence theory expresses that people do not commit crimes because they are afraid of getting caught. According to deterrence theory, people are less likely to committing a crime if the punishment is swift, certain and severe. Therefore, if there is a small likelihood that you 'll get caught or

Everyone can relate to breaking the rules in one form or another. It seems to be human nature to do what one knows is wrong, and this is evident for people of all ages, beginning with children as young as two years old and extending throughout adulthood and into a person’s last days on earth. Whether it is as extreme as violating the law or simply not following instructions, misbehaving is an everyday thing. Usually when somebody is violating certain rules, they are fully aware of their actions. They are also fully aware of the potential consequences that could result from getting caught, yet they do it anyway. One of the main goals of punishment is deterrence. Deterrence is defined as a theory that the fear of punishment will discourage individuals from committing criminal acts. However, as it will be revealed throughout this article, deterrence is somewhat unrealistic because it is impossible to convict and punish everybody who has committed a moral or legal violation.

B.F. Skinner’s theory of behaviorism claims that behavior is directed by environmental reinforcements, some natural and some intentionally applied. Skinner proposed three possible consequences of any behavior: reinforcements which are consequences which increase the likelihood of behavior (such as praise or food), punishments which tend to decrease behavior (such as a frown or a traffic ticket), and the lack of reinforcement or punishment which also tends to decrease behavior (such as no response to the punch line of a joke). He also holds that reinforcers can be learned (money becomes valuable because of it 's

First, to illustrate the excellence and vigilance of nursing care one must apprehend components necessary in an education of individual promoting grow into a professional healthcare provider. Baid and Hargreaves (2015) explain that " Safe and high quality nursing care requires nurses to have a thorough understanding of the rationales for why nursing interventions are carried out in addition to being able to correctly perform the psychomotor aspects of clinical practice " (p.175). Therefore, the introduction of simulation allows students to learn in a safe environment to develop assessment skills and to integrate quality and safety of the practice. Moreover, fidelity, validity, and reliability are the main components of simulation education

A rational person is thought to measure both the gains and losses before committing a crime and would more than likely to be deterred from violating the law they believed the loss was greater than the gain according to the deterrence theory. The deterrence theory is based on the belief that humans control their behavior based on the perceived rewards and punishments that would result from such actions. Which has led many theorists to believe that the proper to punish, a defiant act is by severe, certain, and swift punishment was the key to deterrence. The deterrence theory relies on three individual components: severity, certainty, and celerity. It is thought severe penalties, will desist from criminal acts, which thus prevent crime. However, if the sentence believed to be too harsh would be considered unjust. While, punishments not severe enough will not deter criminals from committing crimes.

The base of consequentialim lies in offering a punishment, which would help in bringing forth the good outcomes. In this theory good effects may be derived from offering the punishment which may compromise

David Premack’s principles of reinforcement and of punishment states that a high- probability behavior can be used to reinforce a low-probability behavior. This theory suggests that if a person wants to perform an activity, the person will perform a less desirable activity to get to the one they want, the activity themselves are the reinforcers. An individual is more motivated to perform an activity if they know they will be able to take part in a more desirable activity therefore. If more desirable behaviors are made contingent upon less desirable behaviors, then the lower probability behaviors are more likely to occur. This principle states that punishment is the opposite of reinforcement: If reinforcement strengthens behavior, then punishment weakens behavior.

There are different levels of penalties in response to unwanted behaviors. Punishment and penalty are ways to decreased behaviors just as ignoring annoying behaviors. A consequence is one type of punishment that is unwanted by the performer. Penalty is when a consequence is values by the performer. These two punishments only stop or decrease the unwanted behavior, this do not meant he issue will not re-occur.

In 1933, Thorndike developed an explanation for his Law of Effect. His experimentations revealed that some events, usually those that one would expect to be pleasant seemed to “stamp in” a response that had just occurred. Noxious events, he continued, seemed to “stamp out” the response, or make it less likely to occur (Pierce and Cheney, 2004). Thus, the principles of reinforcement can be summarized as operants followed by consequences that increase or decrease the probability of response in the same situation (Pierce and Cheney, 2004).

Satisfying consequences are likely to enable repeated behaviors in the future. Meanwhile, when unwanted consequences are produced the behaviors are less prone to replication. This is referred to as the law of effect. As a result, reinforcement is typically more effective than punishment. Choice has a vital role in operant conditioning. These behaviors