Obama's Foreign Policy on China Essay

was the catchphrase and mentality going into his administration. But that was on the only motto his administration had. During Obama’s presidential campaign, he did an easy job at depicting the Republicans as incapable and stupid people. And so Obama’s remedy to fixing problems was “don’t do stupid stuff”, this would later on be used as a doctrine for his foreign policy and United States involvement in the world up until the last days of his second term. Since the end of the Cold War, a large number

against foreign state and non-state actors. Although, the Liberalist theory permeates the Obama administration’s documented strategy within the NSS, in a realist fashion the document defines the primary American interest as, security of the country, its citizens, and its partners. Liberalism has a negative impact on national security, as the theory does not sufficiently address future threats to a states’ sovereignty. Through the lens of liberalism, the U.S. national strategy and policy is advantageous

primacy from China, the United States government and public began prioritizing domestic issues. However, persisting transnational concerns, especially illicit drug trafficking, nuclear weapons proliferation, and the threat of terrorism, largely depend on U.S. involvement based on our relatively successful past efforts and President Barack Obama’s promising diplomatic approach towards foreign policy. Obama’s diplomatic, multilateral outreach towards foreign governments, most recently China and Russia

and education. In his second inaugural speech four years later, he reiterated these beliefs, adding a special emphasis in social and racial equality. Obama’s actions and opinions do not exist in a vacuum, but are influenced, approved, supported and criticized by several government institutions as well as the public. While reviewing Barack Obama’s period as president, it is important to consider the Senate and Congress’ role in dismissing or vetoing much of his proposed reforms. In spite of this

Third and finally, Bremmer’s preferable approach, the Independent America approach, focuses on America’s errors with an imperialistic style of foreign policy. Bremmer states that the United States should let those boiling points in Europe and the Middle East be handled by their own countries. This idea focuses on the betterment of the United States economy and social problems. Pointing to the recent events in Ukraine the Independent approach makes the point of the fact that the American people do

In President Obama’s speech at the U.S. and China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, he outlines the “essential steps in advancing a positive, constructive, and comprehensive relationship between the two countries.” In the President’s 2011 State of the Union Address, he provides four critical steps to achieve economic recovery in addition to several pressing domestic and international policies. What both these speeches hold in common, is the logic behind the liberalism tradition of international

We’re fast approaching the end of Obama’s tenure as President of the United States meaning inevitable discussions regarding the ‘Obama legacy’ are beginning to emerge. Common amongst such discussions is Mullen’s assertion that Obama has been a ‘good President in bad times’ (Mullen, January 2016) with commentators applauding his legalisation of same sex marriage, reducing of unemployment and the deficit, his normalisation of relations with Iran and Cuba as well as his implementation of ‘Obamacare’:

Bush wanted to restore the security of the United States. Many of the policies he enacted, while controversial, are still used by the current administration. One of these policies was the operation of the Guantanamo Bay detention center. While it has had far reaching domestic effects it is still a foreign policy issue by nature. The prisoners that have been held in Guantanamo come from all over the world, including Algeria, China, and Pakistan. The governments of these countries and many others are

countries around the world, including the U.S. Domestic policies that improved incentives for economic competitiveness were one of the main reasons that China was so successful in increasing its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). “The combination of Chinese land and labor with the capital and expertise of Taiwan and Hong Kong industrialists provided a particularly important boost to exports and employment during the first decade of reform.” China attracted investments from multi-national corporations

free market policies, often justifying his approach with American productivity. For instance in his 2006 State of the Union address Bush asserted that “with open markets and a level playing field, no one can out-produce or out-compete the American worker” (Bush, State of Union, 2006). This unmistakeably shows Bush’s favouring of free trade policies over protectionism. This belief is, to an extent, reflected in his practice as Bush did enact a series of new trade agreements with foreign nations, something