Opening Statement for State V. John Hudson and Dale Buckner Essay

First degree murder is one committed with the specific intent to kill, plus premeditation and deliberation.

MILLERSBURG — A former Loudonville man on Monday admitted being in possession of a loaded gun during a May traffic stop.

One Supreme Court member that stands out from the rest would have to be John Marshall. There is no doubt about this because he made the Supreme Court a co-equal branch of government. This means that it was an equal branch to the legislative and the executive. He became a Supreme Court Justice in 1801 and was appointed by John Adams. While holding his position he set three major goals that set precedents and made him the most significant Supreme Court Justice ever. Marshall strengthened the national government, weakened the state government, and strengthened the conditions for business and stabilized the economy. Before John Marshall was the Supreme Court Justice, there were attempts to balance the Court which had failed. His decisions

The Wayne County commissioners approved a request from Prosecutor Dan Lutz to appoint the Holmes County Prosecutor’s Office to take over a case involving a former Wooster Police officer who allegedly broke into a current officer’s home.

In the case of State v. Heitman, Gary Heitman was sentenced to 8-12 years in prison for charges of “criminal conspiracy to commit first degree sexual assault on a child” (Heitman 1). Gary Heitman, 53, sent lude and perverse emails and letters to a 14-year-old girl, referred to as A.S. His first physical encounter with the girl was handing her an envelope containing “a $100 bill, three condoms, and a letter” (Heitman 1). After the girl had informed authorities, they took matters into their own hands and began to email Heitman under the guise of A.S. In this case of entrapment, there was sufficient evidence before the happening of the guise, and only warranted authorities to be sure that his intentions were clear. I believe that drawing on neither

“The lawful defense of such person or of another, when the person using force reasonably believes such force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another."

There are several people whose names you will hear throughout the trial. There is the victim, Vicky. There are the accomplices that committed the crime, Richie Red and Bobby Blue. Finally, there is the respondent, Pat Purple, who you will learn aided in the assault of the victim in order to steal her cell phone.

“The intentional killing of another person by someone who has acted willfully, deliberately, or with planning” (Cornell Law School). That’s the definition of first-degree murder - an intentional killing committed by someone who’s premeditated on the decision. Keeping this in mind, in the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, we are introduced to two characters, Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff. Sanger Rainsford is guilty of murder in the first-degree because he intentionally killed General Zaroff, planned his intervention, and showed no remorse for his actions.

At trial, Abel sought to rebut Ehle's testimony by introducing the testimony of Mills who stated that after the robbery, Ehle admitted to Mills that Ehle intended to testify falsely against Abel to get a reduced sentence.Abel (defendant) was charged with a bank robbery. One of his cohorts in the robbery, Ehle, pled guilty to the robbery and agreed to testify against Abel. At trial, Abel sought to rebut Ehle’s testimony by introducing the testimony of Mills who stated that after the robbery, Ehle admitted to Mills that Ehle intended to testify falsely against Abel to get a reduced sentence. In response to this, the prosecution sought to call Ehle back to the stand to testify that he, Able, and Mills were all part of a secret prison gang that required its members to deny its existence and commit perjury for each other.

At the end of the day although the prosecutor and dick hickock make valid point about the appropriate punishment for the crime, the prosecutor comment that dick death sentence should not be contingent on who actually pulled the trigger is a more valid statement while we may never know who pulled the trigger on the clutters, whether it be Perry side of the story or dick’s side of the story. We do know that dick is just as guilty as perry if not more, due to his involvement to the crime. He came up with the plan to rob and kill the clutters from his prison cell, he didn’t try to not kill the clutters when Perry asked him to leave after they didn’t find the money he stayed, he was always the brains in the group so the decision to get rid of the witnesses was

Smith and Hickock are on trial for four slayings which were the outgrowth of a robbery that failed to produce anticipated large sums of money. Al Dewey investigated the head of the case.The KBI agent said Smith told officers that Hickock threatened to rape the Clutter girl but that he (Smith) told Hickock "there wasn't going to be anything like that." Dewey said Smith first began telling officers about the crime after Hickock had already made a statement. The KBI agent quoted Smith as saying "just look at that Hickock. Isn't he tough? He always said if we got picked up we wouldn't say anything. Now just look at him talk.

Section II The document presents a scenario regarding two ostensible perpetrators named Slick Martin and Jim Lawbreaker. It appears that Marin entered a local grocery store, demanded cash from the clerk, and then fled in a car driven by Lawbreaker. Employees gave descriptions, fingerprints were taken, and photos of the tread print of the tire were taken by officers. Four hours after the robbery, police matched the automobile description of the car and arrested Lawbreaker due to an outstanding warrant. Police Mirandize Lawbreaker after finding a gun in the car. Lawbreaker admits he and Martin committed the robbery. A few weeks later, Martin is arrested, tells police he knows nothing and requests a lawyer. Police swab his inner cheek to obtain a DNA sample and show his photo to one of the witnesses. Joe Justice is the County Prosecutor, reviews the evidence, and receives a call from Lawbreaker's attorney, noting that Lawbreaker will plead guilty to a reduced charge of one count of robbery and agree to testify against Martin.

There are five subjects closely involved in the case. Suspect 1) James Smith; Suspect 2) Daniel Piling (James Smith 's room mate); Victim 1) Sarah Prescott (James Smith 's girlfriend); Witness 1) Bill Henry – neighbor at 111 Plummer St, Daytona Beach; and Witness 2) Jill Smith (James Smith 's estranged wife). The actual charge was murder. The victim died as a result

The state’s case rested upon the shoulders of two eyewitnesses, Alfred Bello and Arthur Dexter Bradley, both of whom had their own rap sheets and credibility problems, and the police had little evidence linking Carter and Artis to the murders. There were no fingerprints taken at the bar, conflicting testimonies about Carter’s car, and bullet forensics that conflicted with shells and weapons found in Carter’s. Ballistics experts testified that the shooter had used .32 Smith and Wesson copper coated bullets and Remington Express plastic shells, while the firearms found in Carter’s car included .32-caliber Smith and Wesson lead bullets and a Super X Wesson 12-gauge shotgun shell. The

Echoing my forum statement of week 2, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) was created by, and receives its authority from Article III of the United States (U.S.) Constitution in 1787 and ratified in 1789 [1]. As head of the U.S. Governments judicial branch, the role of SCOTUS is to enforce the Rule of Law of the U.S. Constitution, seeing that the lower courts do not undermine the Constitution and the freedoms and liberties it provides to the citizenry; they are the ultimate arbiters in judicial cases. SCOTUS is comprised of a Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices, who are all appointed by the President of the United States, but must be confirmed by Congress, and serve a life term until they choose to retire, resign or are removed due to gross neglect or legal misconduct. The SCOTUS also acts a check and balance to the President and Congress, ensuring they do not abuse their authority by exercising their