Organization is Crucial When Making a Sound Argument Essay example

In my opinion, Mr. Kristof’s tone is inappropriate for this issue. Although I do agree with the author, in my opinion taking a serious tone would go further in conveying his view. Many individuals take this topic close to heart and would not appreciate the light hatred jokes. I personally already believed that hunting animals to balance out the ecosystem and should be a modern practice. Some specific statements in the article did stick out at me; one example of the statements was when Kristof stated that the human killed the predator but did not take over the role of hunter. One implicit assumption Kristof makes in this article is when he sais it is estimated that one hundred fifty people a year in car crashes. I agree with Kristof if

Hunting is an extremely controversial topic in the U.S. Since the beginning of history, man has hunted animals for food to live and to utilize other parts for clothing and other essential reasons. There are many people who are strongly opposed to hunting and think that it should be banned. There are also many people that support hunting and think that it is an acceptable thing to do. One such writer, Rick Bass, describes a similar emotion in his essay, “Why I hunt”. In the essay, he emphasizes his deep love for hunting and claims that it is an enjoyable activity. He employs such details to his story describing his surrounding beautifully that towards the end of the article, his attempts to appeal to reader’s imagination strengthen his

In his essay, “Why I Hunt” readers have a chance to get a passionate hunter’s perceptive in what hunting is like. Rick Bass shares his story of an unplanned immigration west to the Yaak valley with his wife. He uses strong appeals to ethos to strengthen his credibility and build his argument. He describes in such details as the beauty of the nature that instantly makes him feel the connection as he arrives. Before he shared his hunting experiences he describes the forest with intense emotion by stating “The dense purples of the spruce and fir forests, the ivory crests of the ice-capped peaks, and the slender ribbons of gray thread rising from the chimneys of the few cabins nudged close to the winding river below, and we fell in love with the Yaak Valley and hard logged Kootenai National Forest” (Bass pp). Additionally, he calls the forest a “predator’s showcase” (Bass pp), informing readers that the forest shelters a variety of animals such as wolverines, bobcats, bald eagles, coyotes and so on. This is an emotional and powerful description that helps a reader imagine and paint a picture in their head of what the forest looks like. He is also justifying hunting by making this an ethical argument as well. Hunting has always been a very controversial topic. In fact, many

In America, deer are an animal hunted widely throughout our country. Each winter citizens have mixed emotions about the sport. Some say its barbaric and cruel, while others argue that it’s beneficial and useful. Although people may say hunting is cruel and barbaric, have they ever thought about the upsides to be gained from hunting? While this is a topic that can be argued viciously back and forth, I believe hunters win the argument. Deer hunting keeps the population down, protects farmers’ crops, boosts economic sales, betters a person’s mental health, and teaches lifelong lessons on respect. These are just a few of the amazing benefits that can be gained from hunting.

In his letter titled “Why Recreational Hunting in Western Canada is Morally Justified,” Sven states that he is arguing for “responsible hunting where the primary benefits are the pleasure of hunting animals in the wilderness and eating their meat.” Despite several strengths, his weaknesses in reasoning outweigh the few positives. Thus, the letter’s overall worth is negligible. The letter’s weaknesses in reasoning lie in Sven’s central justifications for recreational hunting, being human pleasure and eating meat, in his supporting argument for animal suffering, and in his failure to define recreational hunting’s necessity.

Hunting is a controversial topic because it involves a two sided argument. Many people believe that hunting benefits both people and the environment and that it should be allowed in America, while others believe that hunting is cruel to animals, does not provide any benefits, and that it should not be allowed. Hunting started when people made the very first tools and weapons 40,000 years ago during the Stone Age (Wilson 6). The weapons usage was a form of technology. Animal skins and fur were used for making clothes. Horns and bones from the animals were used for making tools, weapons, and ornaments (Wilson 7). In the beginning, the primary reason for hunting was for survival. Today, the primary reason for hunting is not for survival but for

For many people when hunting season comes it’s all about getting their favorite hunting rifles or bows ready for the hunting season and going out into nature for some deer hunting, an American tradition that many hunters take enjoyment in and for many it’s way of life for them and their families, but for others deer hunting may seem like nothing but a slaughter that hunters take part in for free meat and somehow find an enjoyment in the process, however these individuals do not realize that hunting is in fact very morally sound and that Deer hunting benefits the environment through population control, the purchasing of hunting licenses which fund environmental and conservation programs, and through the reduction in the spread of disease or illness through the thinning of

The other morning two hunters woke up and got ready to go for a hunt. As they arrived to the grounds, they set up their stands. They had heard a strange noise when they got there, but didn’t worry too much about it. About thirty minutes into their hunt they came across this very peculiar animal. Neither of the men recognized what type of an animal it was. They took a picture of it on their camera and reported it to the animal control. They had talked to the men and told them that people have been reporting them by their houses. These animals can be violent, and they are a harm to our hunting animals.

history of hunting reveals that hunters of today share many of the same motivations and methods as ancient hunters. While technology and accessories may be different that those used for hunting thousands of years ago, the ability to take down an animal is something to be celebrated. When you learn the history of hunting, you’ll gain greater appreciation for this old tradition. Hunting is an essential component of conservation and can be used in everyday life; it has been a part of American history from its earliest beginnings and once provided a necessary source of food. In the early 1900s, when many wildlife species were almost near extinction, hunters stepped forward and asked Congress to impose an excise tax on the sale of firearms and ammunition products to help fund wildlife conservation in the United States. Another act that came into effect was the Conservation Movement. The conservation movement covers the movement to preserve and protect America’s wildlife, the lands, and other natural resources. A lot of hunters hunt for one purpose and that is to feed their families. These hunters usually hunt during the specific seasons where they can harvest the animals that their families will eat. Hunting is also an effective form of management because it will remove a number of individual animals from a population and prevent them from reproducing. Reducing the population will reduce human/animal conflicts, such as car collisions, Lyme disease and landscaping damage.

“Waking up hours before the dawn, and to know the utter silence of a late autumn morning. Hearing the crunch of snow under your boots as you begin the hike into the distant, silent mountains. Smelling the pines along the trail, and see the silent sentinel spruces on the ridge, barely glimpsed in the pre-dawn dark. It’s enough to sit, shivering, at the best spot on the top rim of a remote basin, watching the east grow bright, waiting for the first rays of warm sunshine to break through the trees and drive away the bitter cold of night.” Although some people think that hunting is animal cruelty, I believe that hunting is crucial to maintain the balance of animal population before they become over populated. Hunting in general is a broad topic so, I will be using deer as the main point.

In order to protect vital food sources, past heritages, traditions, and cultural values for future generations, the government should not ban the practice of hunting wild animals. Author Jacqueline Thursby argues, in her article “Hunting and Feasting in Utah and Idaho” that this region is “rugged country; it is no easy task, even today, to make a living there, and wild game continues to serve as a mainstay for some families” (103). Most urban families take for granted the accessibility of the supermarket; a convenience that is hardly used for these communities in Utah and Idaho, mostly thriving off of what the earth provides for them. Banning the right to hunt in this region would be similar to closing down all providers of food in big cities,

Aldo Leopold pioneered “land ethics” in the first half of the 20th century. Inspired by Leopold, his fellow professor at the University of Wisconsin, Van Rensselaer Potter, coined the term “bioethics” in the second half of the 20th century (1970). Both terms have a powerful social and personal component. Both terms connote an integration of values and the environment. So, too, do “hunt ethics,” an integration of values and an action based upon biology and the ‘land.’

Is there a method to the “madness” of hunting? Are all hunters as evil and morally corrupt as most animal rights activists will have you speculate? While most Americans hunt for food down the aisles of a grocery store, the issue of hunting has begun integrating a focus upon the plight of the hunted. With anti hunting rhetoric dominating the social landscape, for the average person, finding a morsel of impartial truth about hunting amongst a field of political agendas may seem daunting. Although many animal welfare rights activists doubt the practicality and purpose of wildlife hunting in general, skeptics should consider the importance and necessity of traditional hunting, the repercussions of a non-hunting society, as well as the cruelty a hunting ban would pose for both man and beast.

In our world today, hunting has been a major debate between hunters and non-hunters. People can’t understand the realization of hunting until they actually choose to put themselves behind the sights. The benefits of hunting somehow continue to be hidden behind the losses and liabilities of the sport. However because of the calming silence, perfectly tasteful meat, and the gorgeous views, I believe hunting is good for us and the environment. Hunters have tried to prove their reasoning in order for hunting to be seen as a help instead of a hinder. This debate will most likely continue to be a problem for many years to come.

There are many issues and topics that americans disagree about. One of these recent topics is hunting. Hunting is the activity of pursuing wild animals or game, for food or sport. This is a recent issue because some believe this activity is wrong and they do not agree with people using guns to harvest wild animals. These people are called “anti-hunters”. These anti-hunters see hunting as people going out in the wilderness and killing helpless and defenseless animals. On the other end of the spectrum we have the hunters. These people think that hunting is okay and that it in fact actually helps both humans and animals. Hunters want to continue this passion of theirs and do not want it to go away. There are two sides to this argument. One being