preview

Osteoarthritis: Benefits And Limitations

Decent Essays

Discussion In the search for other systematic reviews thought the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, and Proquest Medical, there were many publications on the topic of long distance running and its relationship to osteoarthritis. The articles had to be narrowed down by using keywords along with specific inclusions and exclusions. After doing so, 15 articles that were most relevant to the topic were chosen. The initial finding based off the articles indicated that knee osteoarthritis in former marathon runners is not common. The studies also suggest that long distance running does not cause significant damage to the knee in healthy individuals. Other findings indicated that hip osteoarthritis is rising, especially in former marathon runners and in …show more content…

The ability to conduct the studies was very difficult as the studies depend on extraneous variables such as; the type of running surface, the type of footwear, the foot-strike and gait pattern, age, gender, BMI, and the number of miles ran by an athlete, these factors all influence knee damage differently. It is also difficult to perform studies on OA due to its reliance on time. The growth of OA takes many years and has to be closely monitored. Selection bias is another limitation of the literature, since all participants in the studies were healthy with no history of injury. Athletes who develop osteoarthritic symptoms often stop running and opt to participate in lower impact activities (Hansen, English, & Willick, 2012). Furthermore, the majority of the studies were conducted on experienced runners, which is likely not representative of the larger population. Further studies are needed in order to examine the effects of footwear and gait pattern on performance and injury …show more content…

Using 15 articles increases the reliability and diverseness of the information presented. Another strength of this review is that it includes a good mix of studies which included a 10-year longitudinal study, case controls, and comparisons. Weaknesses of this systematic review include: limiting articles to those that are in English, the inclusion and exclusion criteria selected, and limiting the search within three databases. These limitations could have resulted in the analysts missing key information from other sources, that could have offered stronger support or contradiction. Other weaknesses include the size of the studies conducted, and the selection criteria of healthy experienced athletes for many of the studies, as this may not accurately represent the larger

Get Access